Possibility to ignore scanned files by suffix or regex, similar to GUARDDOG_YARA_EXT_EXCLUDE ?

[Akalanka47000]

A feature like this would be greatly helpful in discarding off false positives. One example is that in Golang, certain libraries such as the AWS SDKs have tests which get flagged by the existing rules. If we could just tell guarddog to ignore test files this would not be a problem. Library tests are things which we never run so I'm assuming it is okay to ignore them

[christophetd]

Hi @Akalanka47000

With the release of GuardDog v3, hopefully the overall score (v.s. individual findings) help. Can you share some example of problematic packages? We would consider adding support for a "suppression rules" feature, but we feel like we should start by tackling the root cause of any problematic / too noisy rules