Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
|
@davidebazzi David are you using this file format? |
1 reply
|
Is there a chance to provide a smooth transition? Perhaps a custom converter could help to transform from one type to the other? |
0 replies
|
This is not about |
0 replies
|
@Steinblock Jürgen are you using this file format internally to store your drawings? |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Moving forward we will probably change almost all usage of the .Net 1.1 and WinPower collections to their optimized System.Collections.Generic counterparts. CADability serializes type names into the .cdb.json json'ish file format. Therefore, if we do so:
the
.cdb.jsonfile format would breakWe are currently looking into a newer System.Text.Json file format that only saves type information where necessary, allowing for more under-the-hood refactorings in the future.
Q: Is any contributing party using the current CADability file format to store data? Do we need a fully working migration path for existing data?
All reactions