Repository navigation
gns3 architecture design failure vis a vis gns3_gui.ini #2139
josephmhiggins
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
|
The gns3 developers need to reevaluate what, and what not, belongs in gns3_server.ini and gns3_gui.ini (obviously the extensions are different for each operating system). But I see no leg to stand on for the gns3 developers with respect to the architectural design of those "config" files are < gns3 version 3.0 |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Per Ean Towne, we will have to wait for gns3 3.0
But...
Per gns3 developers should never implement a change that puts timestamps in gns3 config files #2118
and gns3_gui.ini:
state:
recent_projects:
recent_files:
geometry
I will have to create a wrapper around gns3 so I can backup configuration changes.
recent_projects is not a configuration change
recent_files is not a configuration change
geometry, I do not consider a configuration change
state, I do not consider a configuration change
the datetime the gns3_gui file was save is not a configuration change
This is not a programming design.
I should not have to create a wrapper around the gns3 developers architecture.
My new Start-Gns3.ps1 works great.
My new Start-Gns3.ps1 calls my fixed Backup-Gns3AppData.ps1
My fixed Backup-Gns3AppData.ps1 works great.
I will have to let my Backup-Gns3AppData.ps1 slide a bit while I look over the
properties recent_projects and recent_files.
I do not know what State and Geometry are, but I am not backing up how big my gns3 gui is.
Again, per Ean, I wait for gns3 3.0
I should not be forced to create a wrapper around the gns3 developers -which I am now.
The gns3 developers create wrappers around qemu, npcap, et. al.
I should not be doing this.
I will publish my start-gns3.ps1 and fixed up backup-gns3appdata.ps1 in the gns3 community - soon.
All reactions