Thank you for helping make this resource better for the entire community. This repo is maintained by the OWASP GenAI Data Security Initiative and welcomes contributions from security engineers, framework experts, researchers, and practitioners at any experience level.
- New framework mappings — a framework not yet covered
- Control updates — a framework has released a new version
- Incident references — a real-world incident that illustrates a vulnerability
- Tool additions — an open-source tool relevant to a mapping entry
- OT/ICS specifics — industrial context for any mapping entry
- Translations — see
/i18n/for language stubs - Bug fixes — broken links, incorrect control IDs, typos
- Framework submissions — use the Submit-a-Standard page to submit a new framework for automated mapping
The fastest way to add a new framework:
- Go to Submit-a-Standard in the web app
- Paste your framework controls as JSON (see
data/framework-schema.jsonfor the schema) - The classifier pipeline automatically proposes mappings to all 41 OWASP entries
- A PR is opened for review — use the Review page to accept/reject
You can also submit via the GitHub Issue template .
- Check open issues — your contribution may already be in progress
- For new framework files, open an issue first to confirm scope
- Read
shared/SEVERITY.mdbefore assigning severity ratings - Read
shared/GLOSSARY.mdfor consistent terminology
Every mapping file must follow this structure:
1. Header comment block (source list, framework, version, license)
2. H1 title: "[Source list] × [Framework]"
3. One-paragraph description of the framework
4. Framework domain/control summary table
5. Quick-reference summary table (ID, Name, Severity, Controls, Tier, Scope)
6. Audience tags
7. Detailed mappings — one H3 section per vulnerability:
- Severity
- Description (2 sentences max)
- Real-world reference (if known)
- Framework control table (Control, ID, Description, Tier, Scope)
- Mitigations by tier (Foundational / Hardening / Advanced)
- Tools table (Name, Type, Link)
- Cross-references (other source lists + other frameworks)
8. Implementation priority table
9. References
10. Changelog table
11. Footer link
Copy agentic-top10/Agentic_AIUC1.md
as your starting template — it is the reference implementation.
- Fork the repo
- Create a branch:
git checkout -b feat/framework-nameorfix/broken-link - Make your changes following the file template
- Verify all links work
- Add a changelog entry at the bottom of any file you modify
- Update
data/JSON if you are modifying a mapping entry - Open a PR using the PR template — fill in every checklist item
PRs without a source/evidence link will be held for review until one is provided.
Do not change severity ratings without citing one of:
- An AIVSS score from aivss.owasp.org
- A CVSS score from an associated CVE
- The OWASP source list definition with a direct link
See shared/SEVERITY.md for full guidance.
If your contribution adds or changes a mapping entry, please also update
the corresponding JSON file in /data/. The schema is in
data/schema.json. This keeps the machine-readable
layer in sync with the markdown.
data/entries/*.json, data/backlinks.json and the webapp bundles
(docs/data.js, docs/backlinks.js, docs/frameworks-registry.js,
docs/incidents.js) are written by scripts/generate.js, never by hand.
data/stats.json and the README badges come from npm run stats.
The build is deterministic: running npm run build twice on the same
sources produces byte-identical output, and the generated files carry no
run date, machine name or other build-time value. CI regenerates everything
and fails on any diff, so after changing a mapping file run:
npm run build # generate → validate → stats:check
npm test # includes the determinism and bundle checks
git diff --exit-code # must be clean apart from your intended changeGitHub Pages serves docs/ straight from main, which is why the bundles
are committed rather than built on deploy. Keep it that way unless the
Pages source is deliberately switched to a workflow-based deploy.
This project follows the OWASP Code of Conduct. All contributors are expected to engage respectfully and constructively.
All contributors are credited in the repo contributors graph and in release notes. Significant contributions will be highlighted in the OWASP GenAI Data Security Initiative acknowledgements.
Open a GitHub Discussion or reach out via the OWASP GenAI Security Project.
Thank you for contributing to open-source AI security.