Repository navigation
馃摙 Potential removal of dataframe field in Haystack Document - We need your feedback!
#8688
Replies: 10 comments
|
It doesn't affect me, I think it works. |
|
I've never used it in my projects actually so it won't affect any of my workflows. |
|
Never understood the point of Dataframe and blob field to be honest |
|
I think it鈥榮 nice to remove it. content and blob is enough |
|
Not used though knew it existed. |
|
Never used it! I think removal is a go 馃槑 |
|
I don't use it and it actually prevented me for using hayhooks in a deployment |
|
Haven't used it in any of my 3 previous projects and wasn't planning to |
|
Thank you everyone for your feedback! Based on this, we have decided to deprecate and remove the |
|
Althoug I am late to the discussion, I would like to point out a problem with this: |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello everyone,
We are considering removing the
dataframefield from the HaystackDocumentdataclass and would appreciate your feedback to understand its impact.Here's why we're exploring this:
DataFramecreates serialization challenges (e.g., with Hayhooks).dataframeconsistently across different Document Stores requires complex workarounds.馃挰 To make an informed decision, we'd like to hear from you:
dataframefield? If so, how?Please share your thoughts and experiences in the comments. 馃檹
All reactions