Hi, I am testing a small public-safe demo called Fieldheld Recorder:
https://github.com/camirian/fieldheld-recorder
It creates a synthetic evidence bundle for an autonomous coding-style run:
run record, artifact manifest, command log, verifier report, evidence packet,
review packet, diff, and bounded rollback notes.
I am not asking for integration work, and this is not a live agent adapter.
Because traceAI is focused on OpenTelemetry-native AI traces, I would value a
quick architecture critique on the boundary between traces and review artifacts:
- Does an evidence packet/review packet add anything useful beyond span data?
- Is the synthetic-only boundary clear enough?
- What artifact would be missing if this later wrapped a real agent run?
Site: https://fieldheld.com/
Demo: https://youtu.be/3yb8Qvf3J68
If this is not a good fit for the issue tracker, please feel free to close it.
Hi, I am testing a small public-safe demo called Fieldheld Recorder:
https://github.com/camirian/fieldheld-recorder
It creates a synthetic evidence bundle for an autonomous coding-style run:
run record, artifact manifest, command log, verifier report, evidence packet,
review packet, diff, and bounded rollback notes.
I am not asking for integration work, and this is not a live agent adapter.
Because traceAI is focused on OpenTelemetry-native AI traces, I would value a
quick architecture critique on the boundary between traces and review artifacts:
Site: https://fieldheld.com/
Demo: https://youtu.be/3yb8Qvf3J68
If this is not a good fit for the issue tracker, please feel free to close it.