Skip to content

extra indirection in BSON.array(_:)? #87

Description

@tayloraswift

not sure why the BSON.array(_:) enum case is marked indirect, because [BSON] is already indirectly stored?

(not a bug, the label was added automatically and i cannot remove it)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions