add maintainers.md - #144
Conversation
WalkthroughAdds ChangesMaintainer Documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Suggested labels: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@MAINTAINER.md`:
- Around line 15-17: Update the Discussion link in the maintainer table to point
to the actual project proposal or discussion URL for “Context-First AI
Infrastructure,” or mark the link as pending if no valid URL exists; do not
retain the AOSSIE organization homepage.
- Around line 7-9: Update the role-definition entries in the MAINTAINER.md list:
replace the broken Ideator Role Definition and Maintainer Role Definition URLs
with valid canonical pages, or remove those links if no canonical definitions
exist. Keep the valid Mentor Role Definition entry unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 8d7222b1-c661-468d-976a-e78125019344
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
MAINTAINER.md
| @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ | |||
| # Maintainers and Repository Roles | |||
|
|
|||
| This document lists the individuals occupying key roles for this repository. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"occupying" => "fulfilling"
| # Maintainers and Repository Roles | ||
|
|
||
| This document lists the individuals occupying key roles for this repository. | ||
|
|
| @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ | |||
| # Maintainers and Repository Roles | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't the name of the file be "MAINTAINERS.md" instead of "MAINTAINER.md"? What is the most common practice?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"# Maintainers, Mentors and Ideators"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good point, changes to MAINTAINERS.md .
|
|
||
| This document lists the individuals occupying key roles for this repository. | ||
|
|
||
| Role definitions, eligibility criteria, and responsibilities are defined organization-wide in the [AOSSIE Info Repository](https://github.com/AOSSIE-Org/Info): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This document lists the individuals fulfilling the key roles of Maintainer, Mentor and Ideator for this repository, in accordance with AOSSIE's Role Definitions.
|
|
||
| Role definitions, eligibility criteria, and responsibilities are defined organization-wide in the [AOSSIE Info Repository](https://github.com/AOSSIE-Org/Info): | ||
|
|
||
| * [Ideator Role Definition](https://github.com/AOSSIE-Org/Info/blob/main/Roles/Ideator.md) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove these 3 items.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@MAINTAINERS.md`:
- Line 11: Replace the placeholder TODO, `@username`, and `@discord_user` values in
the maintainer roster with verified ownership details, or explicitly relabel the
document as a template instead of an active maintainer directory.
- Line 11: Replace the placeholder identities and contact fields in the role
tables with actionable information: update MAINTAINERS.md lines 11-11 for the
ideator, 17-17 for the mentor, and 23-23 for the maintainer, or clearly label
these entries as a template.
- Line 3: Update the role links in MAINTAINERS.md to reference the canonical
existing documents or filenames, specifically replacing the broken Maintainer.md
and Ideator.md targets while preserving the valid Mentors.md and Roles links.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: f7c65c97-9c1d-4c1f-8d4e-80eb690856d0
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
MAINTAINERS.md
| @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | |||
| # Maintainers, Mentors and Ideators | |||
|
|
|||
| This document lists the individuals fulfilling the key roles of [Maintainer](https://github.com/AOSSIE-Org/Info/blob/main/Roles/Maintainer.md), [Mentor](https://github.com/AOSSIE-Org/Info/blob/main/Roles/Mentors.md) and [Ideator](https://github.com/AOSSIE-Org/Info/blob/main/Roles/Ideator.md) for this repository, in accordance with [AOSSIE's Role Definitions](https://github.com/AOSSIE-Org/Info/tree/main/Roles). | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Fix the broken role-definition links.
The Maintainer.md and Ideator.md references currently resolve to 404 pages, while the linked Roles directory exposes Mentors.md but not those files. Replace them with the canonical documents or correct filenames before publishing. ()
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@MAINTAINERS.md` at line 3, Update the role links in MAINTAINERS.md to
reference the canonical existing documents or filenames, specifically replacing
the broken Maintainer.md and Ideator.md targets while preserving the valid
Mentors.md and Roles links.
Source: MCP tools
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kpj2006, understood. The links remain broken until that role-definition PR is merged, so this finding should stay open for now. Once the canonical files land, MAINTAINERS.md can be updated to point to them.
Addressed Issues:
Fixes #(issue number)
Screenshots/Recordings:
Additional Notes:
Checklist
We encourage contributors to use AI tools responsibly when creating Pull Requests. While AI can be a valuable aid, it is essential to ensure that your contributions meet the task requirements, build successfully, include relevant tests, and pass all linters. Submissions that do not meet these standards may be closed without warning to maintain the quality and integrity of the project. Please take the time to understand the changes you are proposing and their impact.
Summary by CodeRabbit