Skip to content

[PWGDQ] Fill q-vector tables for all PbPb process functions in tableMaker_withAssoc#15741

Open
Ankyyadav wants to merge 6 commits intoAliceO2Group:masterfrom
Ankyyadav:QvectorANDFT0CcumulantsInMakerAssoc
Open

[PWGDQ] Fill q-vector tables for all PbPb process functions in tableMaker_withAssoc#15741
Ankyyadav wants to merge 6 commits intoAliceO2Group:masterfrom
Ankyyadav:QvectorANDFT0CcumulantsInMakerAssoc

Conversation

@Ankyyadav
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Ankyyadav Ankyyadav commented Apr 13, 2026

Q-vector tables are to be filled in tableMaker_withAssoc now rather than using dqFlow to save memory. For all PbPb barrel processes, q-vector tables are filled now except for processPbPbWithFilterBarrelOnly. Added a cofigurable to check if q-vector calibrations exist.
For flow analysis using 2 particle correlations at midrapidity, one needs the RefFlow table filled with sum of squares of amplitude from FT0C. These are now filled in dqFlow. Switched to using a Produces group for all q-vector related tables

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the pwgdq label Apr 13, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 13, 2026

O2 linter results: ❌ 109 errors, ⚠️ 76 warnings, 🔕 0 disabled

@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the title Added a process function to fill q-vector tables and FT0C cumulants for di-electrons in tableMaker_withAssoc . [PWGDQ] Added a process function to fill q-vector tables and FT0C cumulants for di-electrons in tableMaker_withAssoc . Apr 13, 2026
Ankyyadav added a commit to Ankyyadav/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2026
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#15741
@github-actions github-actions Bot added pwghf PWG-HF pwglf pwgje pwgcf pwgem datamodel photon Photon and neutral meson PAG label labels Apr 13, 2026
@Ankyyadav Ankyyadav changed the title [PWGDQ] Added a process function to fill q-vector tables and FT0C cumulants for di-electrons in tableMaker_withAssoc . [PWGDQ] Fill q-vector tables for all PbPb process functions in tableMaker_withAssoc Apr 13, 2026
Ankyyadav added a commit to Ankyyadav/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2026
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#15741
@Ankyyadav Ankyyadav force-pushed the QvectorANDFT0CcumulantsInMakerAssoc branch from 3d99fa1 to 1ca705c Compare April 13, 2026 16:04
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed pwghf PWG-HF pwglf pwgje pwgcf pwgem datamodel photon Photon and neutral meson PAG label labels Apr 13, 2026
Ankyyadav added a commit to Ankyyadav/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2026
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#15741
@Ankyyadav Ankyyadav force-pushed the QvectorANDFT0CcumulantsInMakerAssoc branch from 7342e54 to 4ee4ed2 Compare April 14, 2026 08:51
@Ankyyadav Ankyyadav marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2026 12:14
Comment thread PWGDQ/TableProducer/tableMaker_withAssoc.cxx
@lucamicheletti93
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Dear @Ankyyadav , thanks for the PR! I think that for the moment you can remove the part for the cumulants. We need more test on the memory and on the consistency of the results. My suggestion is to just add the process function to include the filling of the q-vecotor tables when you use central barre j/psi.

Ankur Yadav and others added 6 commits April 19, 2026 20:51
…on to fill Qvector tables for Dielectrons. Fill RefFlow and QvectorExtra table with FT0C cumulants if the cfgFT0CCumulant is true.
…cessPbPbWithFilterBarrelOnly). Added a configurable for Qvector calibration path. The tables shall only be filled if the calibrations are available
…hAssoc. Just use a bool configurable to check if they exist
… and implemented it in dqFlow which still has the cumulant calculation for froward rapidity using GFW to keep all cumulant calculations in one place. New process function in dqFlow for FT0C cumulant
@Ankyyadav Ankyyadav force-pushed the QvectorANDFT0CcumulantsInMakerAssoc branch from c08efdd to de94171 Compare April 19, 2026 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants