Show PyPI Inspector link for remote PyPI findings#797
Conversation
|
If anyone has a chance to take a look, I'd really appreciate a review. Happy to make any changes if needed. Thanks |
|
Hi @0xTaoZ, thanks for the PR! We'll have a look shortly |
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 98cf5868cc
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
a5d4402 to
924bcfc
Compare
|
I rebased your branch, keeping your authorship on the initial commit, to ensure that all commits were signed so this PR can be merged once you confirm you're happy with the changes! |
|
Hi @christophetd ,thanks, this looks great to me. The per-finding deep links are a nice improvement, and I’m happy with the changes,please feel free to merge |
Summary
Fixes #67
Tests
.venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/reporters/test_human_readable.py tests/core/test_cli.py.venv/bin/python -m black --check guarddog/cli.py guarddog/reporters/human_readable.py guarddog/scanners/scanner.py guarddog/scanners/pypi_package_scanner.py tests/reporters/test_human_readable.py tests/core/test_cli.pygit diff --check