You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want to merge compliant metadata into DCAT-US3.0, but we're not sure how to do that.
Given above unknowns, reviewing Lynda Wayne's initial ISO->DCAT-US3.0 schema mapping is needed to provide factual knowledge on future steps.
1 day of effort has been allocated and once compete, findings will be demonstrated and specific future actions will be decided.
Acceptance Criteria
[ACs should be clearly demo-able/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]
WHEN 1 day expires
THEN spreadsheet is discussed with the geoplatform team
AND architecture/design decisions are discussed with the team
AND stories covering future action are created if needed
Background
DCAT-US3.0 and ISO mapping is much more detailed. ISO was always considered way more exact and detailed than 1.1, and 3.0 is much more detailed than 1.1 as well. This may result in a "basic and iterative" approach, whereby we define core examples/fields and then define improvements as future iterations.
Sketch
Review spreadsheet, making notes/comments.
Consider integration with MDTranslator vs custom process
Consider NARA definitions and possible integration
Activity