Skip to content

Review ISO and DCAT-US3.0 initial mapping #6257

Open

Description

@jbrown-xentity

Purpose

We want to merge compliant metadata into DCAT-US3.0, but we're not sure how to do that.

Given above unknowns, reviewing Lynda Wayne's initial ISO->DCAT-US3.0 schema mapping is needed to provide factual knowledge on future steps.

1 day of effort has been allocated and once compete, findings will be demonstrated and specific future actions will be decided.

Acceptance Criteria

[ACs should be clearly demo-able/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]

  • WHEN 1 day expires
    THEN spreadsheet is discussed with the geoplatform team
    AND architecture/design decisions are discussed with the team
    AND stories covering future action are created if needed

Background

DCAT-US3.0 and ISO mapping is much more detailed. ISO was always considered way more exact and detailed than 1.1, and 3.0 is much more detailed than 1.1 as well. This may result in a "basic and iterative" approach, whereby we define core examples/fields and then define improvements as future iterations.

Sketch

  • Review spreadsheet, making notes/comments.
  • Consider integration with MDTranslator vs custom process
  • Consider NARA definitions and possible integration

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

DCAT-US3Tickets related to DCAT-US3 release and support.MD Translator

Type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions