"The Sator Square does not reverse physical entropy; it creates a symbolic subspace where directional entropy is minimized by geometric redundancy."
This repository documents the Sator Research Program, a formal investigation of the Sator Square as a mathematical information structure, integrated into the TAMESIS / TRI / TDTR theoretical framework developed by Douglas H. M. Fulber.
The central objective is to transform the Sator Square from a linguistic curiosity into a rigorous mathematical object. Every claim is classified as either a proved theorem, a computational result, or a modelling choice — following the epistemological standards of the Clay Mathematician and Senior Theoretical Physicist personas.
What this research establishes (defensible without qualification):
A class of linguistic structures with maximal symmetry that induces information redundancy sufficient for partial error recovery behaviour.
| Result | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Symmetry group | Theorem (proved, EXP-06) | |
| Degrees of freedom |
|
Proved (orbit counting) |
| Compression factor | Derived analytically | |
|
|
|
Proved (EXP-07) |
|
|
Computational (not exactly 0) | |
| Monte Carlo rarity | 0 hits / 500,000 trials | Empirical confirmation |
|
|
2 (orbit of size 2) | Computed (EXP-07) |
| Upper bound |
Proved (EXP-07) | |
| Portuguese density | 40 / 385 = 0.104 | Empirical (curated lexicon) |
| Recovery rate ( |
Empirical (EXP-05) |
| Persona | Role | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Foundational Architect | Evaluates coherence of new mathematical objects | ajuste_fino/ajustefino-fund.md |
| Clay Mathematician | Absolute axiomatic rigor — no heuristic as proof | ajuste_fino/ajustefino-clay.md |
| Senior Theoretical Physicist | Physical consistency and regime boundaries | ajuste_fino/ajustefino-fisic.md |
All symmetry constraints verified computationally (0 errors across 25 positions). The matrix
Directional entropy
Monte Carlo (
Portuguese curated lexicon (
The symmetry constraints act as implicit redundancy. Under single-position corruption, the orbit-based majority vote achieves
The group
CSP backtracking over
Pillar 1 — Minimum Orbit Distance
Pillar 2 — Formal Upper Bound (proved):
Proof: any Sator-like square relies geometrically on selections for rows 1, 2, and 3. Bounding the possible options conservatively, the selection relies on forming
Pillar 3 — Full Conditional Entropy:
This is a proved identity, not a measurement: it follows directly from the orbit structure, independent of any specific matrix values.
sator_research/
├── index.html (paper HTML — Tamesis standard)
├── readme.md
├── checklist.md
├── roadmap.md
├── EXECUTION_REPORT.md
│
├── simulations/
│ ├── 01_sator_validator.py
│ ├── 02_entropy_analysis.py
│ ├── 03_rarity_proof.py
│ ├── 04_sator_generator.py
│ ├── 05_tamesis_bridge.py
│ ├── 06_formal_proofs.py
│ └── 07_paper_completion.py
│
├── figures/
│ ├── animations/
│ ├── entropy_maps/
│ ├── formal/
│ ├── rarity/
│ ├── symmetry_viz/
│ └── tamesis_bridge/
│
├── results/
│ ├── entropy/
│ ├── formal/
│ ├── rarity/
│ └── squares/
│
└── ajuste_fino/













