Skip to content

memory: record the PR #2 promotion (rebased onto merged main) - #4

Merged
compusophy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/promotion-memory-rebase
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

memory: record the PR #2 promotion (rebased onto merged main)#4
compusophy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/promotion-memory-rebase

Conversation

@compusophy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

memory-only changeset (TASKBOARD.md + status.md), rebased onto the merged main e48e4ee.

records on the permanent record:

  • PR land the CI gate, diagnostics self-repair loop, restored loop-survival control, worker self-config, and CHARTER #2 merged (squash e48e4ee): CI gate, diagnostics self-repair loop,
    restored loop-survival control, worker self-config, CHARTER now live
    on main.
  • complete fine-grained token scope list (Contents rw, Workflows rw,
    Pull requests rw, Metadata read; Checks/Actions read) — Workflows
    alone was never sufficient.
  • corrected a false TASKBOARD claim that 0582489 had already been
    promoted: it went red and was never merged; found because main still
    lacked ci/run_tests.sh entirely.
  • operational notes: open_pr refuses from main; page reload resets the
    session branch; D10 refusal fired once during this run and the
    reconcile-retry path worked.

note: PR #3 was the same record opened from a pre-merge base — it
conflicted by construction since PR #2 rewrote the very files being
recorded. this branch supersedes it; #3 can be closed unmerged.

… after conflict)

TASKBOARD: token-scope item closed with the complete fine-grained scope
list; the false "promoted through a green pr" claim about 0582489
corrected (it went red and never merged; the superseding branch landed
as PR #2, squash e48e4ee).

status.md: full run record — the 403 → scope fix → PR #2 green merge
chain, the strictly-ahead compare check before opening, open_pr's
refusal from main, D10 firing correctly on my own second commit, and
the created_at staleness wrinkle in git_create_branch.

first attempt at this changeset (PR #3 from a pre-merge base) conflicted
by construction — memory files were rewritten by the very merge being
recorded. rebased onto e48e4ee instead of force-resolving.

memory-only changeset: no source touched, no build impact possible.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
vanish Ready Ready Preview Aug 25, 2026 12:31am

Request Review

@compusophy
compusophy merged commit 1e94dcd into main Aug 25, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant