Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [Optimize Pandas DataFrame Iteration in verify script]#92

Open
alinelena wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
perf-pandas-iterrows-15992796889034871065
Open

⚡ Bolt: [Optimize Pandas DataFrame Iteration in verify script]#92
alinelena wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
perf-pandas-iterrows-15992796889034871065

Conversation

@alinelena

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Replaced df.iterrows() with df.to_dict('records') in verify_processed_omol25.py. Removed redundant .to_dict() methods on row items since they are native python dictionaries rather than pandas Series.
🎯 Why: Iterating over large pandas DataFrames via df.iterrows() is an established anti-pattern known to be extremely slow due to the overhead of creating Series objects for every single row.
📊 Impact: Massively reduces runtime overhead for the verification script, especially when validating large datasets where iteration becomes the bottleneck.
🔬 Measurement: Verify by running the verification scripts over a large .parquet dataset and observing a stark reduction in iteration time compared to the unpatched script. Also verified via existing automated tests in tests/test_verify_processed_omol25.py that core matching logics are unbroken.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 15992796889034871065 started by @alinelena

Replaced df.iterrows() with df.to_dict('records') to drastically
improve iteration performance over pandas DataFrames in
verify_processed_omol25.py. Downstream .to_dict() calls on rows
were appropriately removed.

Co-authored-by: alinelena <3306823+alinelena@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant