Repository navigation
Conversation
|
@BugBuster18 is attempting to deploy a commit to the deepset Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Hi @BugBuster18, thanks a lot for your contribution! 🙏 We noticed that the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) check ( To get your PR reviewed, please sign the CLA via the link in the |
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
|
Hi @BugBuster18, just a friendly reminder: this PR is still in draft because the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) hasn't been signed yet. We'd love to review your contribution! Please sign the CLA via the link in the |
|
Thanks for signing the CLA, @BugBuster18! 🎉 This PR is now ready for review again and the reviewer has been re-assigned. |
|
Thanks for signing the CLA, @BugBuster18! 🎉 This PR is now ready for review again and the reviewer has been re-assigned. |
anakin87
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you!
I pushed a few refinements
Coverage reportClick to see where and how coverage changed
This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary
Fixes input validation in
LLMEvaluatorso malformed tuples are rejected withValueErrorinstead of causing an indexing error. It also checks that input types are declared as parameterized list types. Added regression tests for invalid tuple shapes and type declarations, along with a release note.Tests
test/components/evaluators/test_llm_evaluator.py— 28 passed.git diff --checkpassed.Fixes #13307