Skip to content

chore: exclude .github from static analysis - #74

Merged
saudzahirr merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/exclude-github-from-analysis
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

chore: exclude .github from static analysis#74
saudzahirr merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/exclude-github-from-analysis

Conversation

@saudzahirr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Codacy, SonarQube Cloud and ruff all reach into .github, so CI workflow definitions and the helper scripts they run get graded as if they were library code. Nothing under .github ships in the published package, so findings there fail a quality gate without describing any risk to users of this project.

  • Adds .codacy.yml excluding .github/**, matching the scope already set for SonarQube Cloud in .sonarcloud.properties and following the pattern already used in permit.
  • Points ruff away from the same directory via extend-exclude.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Codacy, SonarQube Cloud and ruff all reach into .github, so CI workflow
definitions and the helper scripts they run are graded as if they were
library code. Nothing under .github ships in the published package, so
findings there fail a quality gate without describing any risk to users.

Adds .codacy.yml excluding .github/** -- matching the scope already set
for SonarQube Cloud in .sonarcloud.properties -- and points ruff away
from the same directory.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@saudzahirr
saudzahirr merged commit 4dde132 into master Aug 18, 2026
4 checks passed
@saudzahirr
saudzahirr deleted the chore/exclude-github-from-analysis branch August 18, 2026 11:48
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants