Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #531 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 74.2% 74.2%
=====================================
Files 320 320
Lines 25655 25655
=====================================
Hits 19047 19047
Misses 6608 6608 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
volker-krey
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, @ywpratama. My main suggestion is to move the section one level up, so that it appears directly under the "Emissions" section.
| @@ -95,6 +95,28 @@ CO2 mitigation options in the energy system include technology and fuel shifts; | |||
| - steam methane reforming with CCS | |||
| - 90% | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would suggest to add the "CO2 Removal Technologies" section, one level higher, i.e. directly below the "Emissions" heading in doc/global/emissions. This would be consistent with the structure of the IAMC Wiki.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, Volker. As suggested, I just moved the section up one level. So, the CDR section is directly under emissions, together with Emission from energy (MESSAGE) and Emissions from land (GLOBIOM) sections.
| Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW) | ||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
|
|
||
| Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adding conventional CDR, so afforestation and reforestation, would be important so that the list is comprehensive.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just added the placeholder for conventional CDR on land on the CDR methods section for now. Will need to coordinate with GLOBIOM team (Yazhen?) and Oliver for the documentation
This draft PR includes a proposal for the documentation of CO2 removal technologies in MESSAGE
How to review
When reviewing this draft PR, please provide feedback on the following but not limited to:
Energysection might be an option too.Emissionspage. Please suggest whether this is appropriate or should it be moved underCO EmissionssectionPR checklist