docs(repo): epic 1 retrospective and story rows to done - #5
Merged
jundymek merged 2 commits intoAug 11, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Supervisor deliverables for epic/1-workspace-scaffold, written at closure after all four story PRs (#1-#4) merged. - Epic 1 retrospective: delivery metrics, six post-run observations with cause and fix, technical debt carried forward, next-epic readiness and eight action items. First retrospective in this repository, so it also establishes the location for the next one. - sprint-status.yaml: the four Epic 1 rows flipped review -> done. Written once, by the supervisor, at closure rather than per story. Refs: epic-1-contract-foundations Agent: superman (terminal-agents, claude-opus-5)
Codex review of the closure commit raised a P1 against it, and it was right: flipping `1.4-perf-spike` to `done` while that story's owner gate is still open makes the lifecycle source of truth signal that Epic 2/3 work may proceed before the decision that releases it. The row goes back to `review` with the reason in-file, on the maintainer's call. The other three Epic 1 rows stay `done`. The retrospective records the finding. Refs: epic-1-contract-foundations Agent: superman (terminal-agents, claude-opus-5)
This was referenced Aug 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this is
Supervisor deliverables for Epic 1, opened from
supervisor/epic-1-workspace-scaffoldbecause they are the supervisor's own work rather than any story's: routing them through a finished story agent would fake their provenance. Two files, no code.1.
docs/implementation-artifacts/epic-1-contract-foundations/epic-1-retrospective.md— the epic retrospective. Delivery metrics, six post-run observations each with symptom / cause / why no story caught it / fix, technical debt carried forward, next-epic readiness, and eight action items with owners. This is the repository's first retrospective, so it also establishes where the next one goes; move it if you want a different location.2.
docs/implementation-artifacts/sprint-status.yaml— the Epic 1 rows written once at closure rather than per story. Three go todone(1.1, 1.2, 1.3). 1.4 deliberately staysreview: its PR is merged, but the story's owner gate — your acceptance of the perf verdict — is still open, and that acceptance is what releases 2.5 / 3.3 / 3.5. I first wrote it asdone; the codex review of that commit raised a P1 saying the lifecycle source of truth would then read "go" before the decision, which was correct. Corrected on your call, with the reason in-file. Flip it yourself when you accept the verdict. Doing it now costs nothing: every story PR is already merged, so theepic-updatednudge this commit fires reaches no agent who is still working. Mid-wave it would have bought every remaining agent a rebase and a re-review.Note this project ships no
sprint-statusscript (no Makefile, noscripts/), so the rows were edited by hand against the four merged PRs (#1–#4) rather than measured by tooling. The four keys are the task ids verbatim, as this file's own header specifies.What I did NOT touch
The
milestones:block — including M1's "CI green", which the maintainer's CI-skip decision deviates. Reconciling a milestone definition is the owner's call and it is action item 6 in the retro.Pending owner, carried from the closure review
VERDICT: canvas-2d viable (>= 55 fps sustained in phases b and c). Story 1.4's task 7 requires it to stay unticked by the agent; it is unticked. Accepting it freezes 2.5, 3.3 and 3.5 against this mechanism, so it is a decision rather than a formality.docs/dev/epic-1/1.4-perf-spike/MANUAL_TESTING.md— the owner's eyeball pass over the spike.None of these is marked passed anywhere.
Verification
docs/only; no code, no test surface. The epic head this branch fast-forwards from (41fb746) was verified in full by me at closure:pnpm lintclean,pnpm typecheckclean across six packages,pnpm test— contract 103, viz 50, scanner 2, deps 2, githist 2, cli 2 = 161 tests, 0 failures — andpnpm buildproducing both the tsup binary and the 131.25 kB browser bundle. This commit changes none of it.Refs: epic-1-contract-foundations
Agent: superman (terminal-agents, claude-opus-5)