Skip to content

docs(repo): epic 1 retrospective and story rows to done - #5

Merged
jundymek merged 2 commits into
epic/1-workspace-scaffoldfrom
supervisor/epic-1-workspace-scaffold
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

docs(repo): epic 1 retrospective and story rows to done#5
jundymek merged 2 commits into
epic/1-workspace-scaffoldfrom
supervisor/epic-1-workspace-scaffold

Conversation

@jundymek

@jundymek jundymek commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What this is

Supervisor deliverables for Epic 1, opened from supervisor/epic-1-workspace-scaffold because they are the supervisor's own work rather than any story's: routing them through a finished story agent would fake their provenance. Two files, no code.

1. docs/implementation-artifacts/epic-1-contract-foundations/epic-1-retrospective.md — the epic retrospective. Delivery metrics, six post-run observations each with symptom / cause / why no story caught it / fix, technical debt carried forward, next-epic readiness, and eight action items with owners. This is the repository's first retrospective, so it also establishes where the next one goes; move it if you want a different location.

2. docs/implementation-artifacts/sprint-status.yaml — the Epic 1 rows written once at closure rather than per story. Three go to done (1.1, 1.2, 1.3). 1.4 deliberately stays review: its PR is merged, but the story's owner gate — your acceptance of the perf verdict — is still open, and that acceptance is what releases 2.5 / 3.3 / 3.5. I first wrote it as done; the codex review of that commit raised a P1 saying the lifecycle source of truth would then read "go" before the decision, which was correct. Corrected on your call, with the reason in-file. Flip it yourself when you accept the verdict. Doing it now costs nothing: every story PR is already merged, so the epic-updated nudge this commit fires reaches no agent who is still working. Mid-wave it would have bought every remaining agent a rebase and a re-review.

Note this project ships no sprint-status script (no Makefile, no scripts/), so the rows were edited by hand against the four merged PRs (#1#4) rather than measured by tooling. The four keys are the task ids verbatim, as this file's own header specifies.

What I did NOT touch

The milestones: block — including M1's "CI green", which the maintainer's CI-skip decision deviates. Reconciling a milestone definition is the owner's call and it is action item 6 in the retro.

Pending owner, carried from the closure review

  1. The merge click on this PR, and then on the epic → master integration PR (which I will open once this one lands, so the base receives the status rows).
  2. Acceptance of the 1.4 perf verdictVERDICT: canvas-2d viable (>= 55 fps sustained in phases b and c). Story 1.4's task 7 requires it to stay unticked by the agent; it is unticked. Accepting it freezes 2.5, 3.3 and 3.5 against this mechanism, so it is a decision rather than a formality.
  3. The six unticked steps in docs/dev/epic-1/1.4-perf-spike/MANUAL_TESTING.md — the owner's eyeball pass over the spike.
  4. The M1 "CI green" wording above.

None of these is marked passed anywhere.

Verification

docs/ only; no code, no test surface. The epic head this branch fast-forwards from (41fb746) was verified in full by me at closure: pnpm lint clean, pnpm typecheck clean across six packages, pnpm test — contract 103, viz 50, scanner 2, deps 2, githist 2, cli 2 = 161 tests, 0 failures — and pnpm build producing both the tsup binary and the 131.25 kB browser bundle. This commit changes none of it.

Refs: epic-1-contract-foundations
Agent: superman (terminal-agents, claude-opus-5)

Supervisor deliverables for epic/1-workspace-scaffold, written at closure
after all four story PRs (#1-#4) merged.

- Epic 1 retrospective: delivery metrics, six post-run observations with
  cause and fix, technical debt carried forward, next-epic readiness and
  eight action items. First retrospective in this repository, so it also
  establishes the location for the next one.
- sprint-status.yaml: the four Epic 1 rows flipped review -> done. Written
  once, by the supervisor, at closure rather than per story.

Refs: epic-1-contract-foundations
Agent: superman (terminal-agents, claude-opus-5)
Codex review of the closure commit raised a P1 against it, and it was
right: flipping `1.4-perf-spike` to `done` while that story's owner gate
is still open makes the lifecycle source of truth signal that Epic 2/3
work may proceed before the decision that releases it.

The row goes back to `review` with the reason in-file, on the
maintainer's call. The other three Epic 1 rows stay `done`. The
retrospective records the finding.

Refs: epic-1-contract-foundations
Agent: superman (terminal-agents, claude-opus-5)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant