docs(ports): document port 8007 for llamacpp-cpu-qwen3-embed (fixes CI)#113
Merged
Conversation
The CPU embedding bundle (#111) binds host port 8007, but the row was never added to docs/developers/port-allocation.md, so the Port Allocation Check CI (scripts/check-port-allocation.js) failed on the PR and on the main push. Add the 8007 row; check now passes (43 ports, all documented).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The Port Allocation Check CI (
scripts/check-port-allocation.js) is failing onmainand was failing on PR #111. The CPU embedding bundle (#111) binds host port8007(127.0.0.1:8007:8000), but the corresponding row was never added todocs/developers/port-allocation.md. The check requires every bundle host port to be documented, so it exits non-zero:(This check is a GitHub Actions check run, which is why it didn't appear in the legacy commit-status API when #111 was merged.)
Fix
Add the
8007row in numeric order. The check now passes:Note
The
deploy-docsVitePress build was verified separately and passes (exit 0) — the only failing workflow was the port check.