EpiBench is a verifiable benchmark for practical epigenomics analysis. Agents receive realistic workflow snapshots and must recover structured empirical answers from the provided data, without being handed a prescribed method.
The preprint evaluates 106 tasks across CUT&Tag/CUT&RUN, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, and DNA methylation workflows. Tasks cover QC, peak calling, chromatin-state comparisons, genomic annotation, differential methylation, alignment, visualization, and downstream quantitative analysis. Endpoint answers are graded deterministically with numerical interval checks, structured label matches, or all-of field comparisons.
Preprint PDF: paper/main.pdf.
evals/: seven public example evaluations with prompt/config metadata.paper/: manuscript source, figures, and compiled PDF.scripts/: utilities for downloading manifest data, regenerating summary tables, and rebuilding paper figures.
The manuscript analyzes 5,088 valid trajectories from 16 model-harness pairs: three attempts for each of 106 evaluations and each model-harness pair. No system passes a majority of endpoint attempts. GPT-5.5 / Pi leads at 45.0% (143/318 attempts), followed by GPT-5.5 / OpenAI Codex at 39.9% (127/318), and Claude Opus 4.8 Max / Pi and GPT-5.4 / Pi at 39.0% each (124/318).
Assay-level pass rates are descriptive rather than controlled comparisons: CUT&Tag/CUT&RUN 34.0%, methylation-seq 33.3%, ChIP-seq 30.6%, and ATAC-seq 22.8%. Field-level scores are higher than endpoint scores, suggesting that agents often find useful intermediate results but fail when assay-specific scientific judgment determines the final answer.
python scripts/make_figures.py
(cd paper && latexmk -pdf main.tex)The paper source is pdfLaTeX-compatible and uses an inline references.tex
bibliography.
@misc{epibench2026,
title = {EpiBench: Verifiable Evaluation of AI Agents on Epigenomics Analysis},
author = {Muralidharan, Harihara and Baskar, Reema and Lee, Soo Hee and Proctor, Tim and Workman, Kenny},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/latchbio/epibench}
}Apache 2.0. See LICENSE.