[PM seat] repo:cloud#1 — 🟢 hotlong · session_01WVbr5J6u8BHh8EyFtcWciH #6026

本贴是 repo:cloud(整仓)座位的唯一权威登记。 座位贴协议(维护者 2026-08-06 批准):索引 = label:pm:seat,总入口 #4604。单写手规则:只有在任座位 PM 编辑正文;接管/移交 = 改正文 + 审计评论;动手前重拉正文、时间戳先到先得、写后回读。

当前 PM

🟢 hotlong · session session_01WVbr5J6u8BHh8EyFtcWciH · seat repo:cloud#1 · R46. The seating time is the stamp on the opening marker 6073312871. The maintainer summoned the seat with /pm-dispatch cloud; the release marker is R45's brief 6066326562.

• Patrol Routine trig_01TA78tTZcarVAAhJPoiQ1YY (self-bound, hourly at :53).
• ⚠️ Linked-user deviation, recorded: the linked user is hotlong, an account in GOVERNED_APPROVERS. The seat sits on the maintainer's direct summons. Writes go through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot], and ⛔ no approving review is ever submitted from this seat.
• Round 1, in-round refresh at the cloud#2709 decision.
• Landed through the queue, each read green on staging:
  • cloud#2729 e95db22b;
  • cloud#2730 e5c715ca;
  • cloud#2172 1d854c1b;
  • cloud#2676 step 4 96a4a131;
  • cloud#2735 22234f2b;
  • cloud#2737 89903da0;
  • cloud#2741 (PR feat(data): enable.files goes live — opt-in gate for the generic Attachments surface (#2727) #2742) b7d13034;
  • cloud#2743: objectos half, PR [objectql] flaky wall-clock assertion in hook-binder fire-and-forget test (<20ms on shared CI runner) #2744 ab2d6152; control-plane half, PR fix(security)!: ADR-0090 follow-ups — driver tenant wall, batch-insert marshaling, scoped counts, vocabulary leftovers #2745 cf0ce049. The card closed with the second.
  • cloud#2748 (PR docs(adr): ADR-0091 (Proposed) — grant lifecycle: effective-dated assignments, delegation, break-glass, recertification substrate #2751) d3528e35, both planes green.
  • cloud#2750 (PR /me/apps returns [] for every principal — reads metadata.list('app') while stack apps live in the engine registry (tabPermissions' only enforced consumer is dead) #2752) dce10383: CI only, no deploy path.
  • cloud#2753, code half (PR Multi-org (enterprise) will re-hit #2734: tenant_isolation RLS strict equality still hides NULL-org platform rows once org-scoping is active #2754) 37c706b9: both planes green; the cache reading passed on the third conversation.
  • cloud#2755 (PR feat(auth): 支持用户名/工号登录 —— 接入 better-auth username 插件 #2756) 0dd7d2ba: objectui alone to d758f2f20dd1, both planes green.
  • cloud#2759 part 1 (PR feat(rest): Excel 导出 select/status 字段带颜色(白底+选项色作字体色) #2761) b2e72f63: composed artifacts refused at the version ingest and the export door, both planes green.
  • cloud#2762 (PR [spec] Remove tenancy.strategy + tenancy.crossTenantAccess at the next major — no requirement (owner decision) #2763) d43ce896: the refusal's texts and pending changeset say flattened-only, both planes green.
  • Upstream: objectstack PR perf(core,plugin-auth): an authenticated request resolves its caller's grants once, not twice #22441 (cloud#2634 item 2) → c7a3234a, after three contract-review rounds: FAIL 6077362013, PASS 6078361755, PASS 6078498883.
• Closed after verification: cloud#2714, feat(ai): split ask/build agents by surface + tool scoping (ADR-0063/0064) #2181, feat(data): enable.feeds/activities real opt-out gates + trackHistory contract (#2707) #2733, feat(mcp): plugin-carried Connect-an-agent Setup page + nav (#2714) #2741 and feat(rest,plugin-security): REST face for the explain engine — GET/POST /api/v1/security/explain (ADR-0090 D6) #2743 at landing; on the maintainer's 10-10 readings, cloud#2753 (third conversation cached 13,791 tokens; 6091868520), feat(approvals): add 'position' approver type resolved via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3) #2738 (no chain on either environment; 6091874562) and DB-created base packages vanish from GET /packages after server restart #2532 (all three plan readings in; 6091880976). The maintainer closed cloud#2531 themselves.
• Filed:
  • cloud: ci(release): restore blocking live-hotcrm smoke — v2 adoption shipped #2730, feat(data): enable.feeds/activities real opt-out gates + trackHistory contract (#2707) #2733, Seed loader: JSON-object field values (location/hq) crash batch insert — showcase account/task/field_zoo seeds silently fail #2735, List total is not scoped by the read filter (row-count oracle) + platform-admin '*' wildcard VAMA does not widen private-object reads #2737, feat(approvals): add 'position' approver type resolved via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3) #2738, fix(cli,plugin-security): os meta resync to re-materialize default permission sets (#2705) #2740 (needs-user-decision), feat(rest,plugin-security): REST face for the explain engine — GET/POST /api/v1/security/explain (ADR-0090 D6) #2743, [attachments] v1 follow-ups: sys_file orphan lifecycle + non-admin permission matrix dogfood #2755, Excel 导出支持 select/status 字段颜色(白底+选项色作字体色) #2757;
  • objectui: [finding] The turbo cache is shared across ALL worktrees — per-task-worktree isolation does not extend to it, so one worktree's bad artifact is served into every other #12077 (finding: the approval request page shows pending_approvers as raw ids);
  • objectstack: [finding] post-stamped refuses every later body edit of a director-ruled card: lanes/director.md puts a bare UTC on the body first line (Ruled: id · letter X · UTC), the position the stamp contract reserves for the writing act #22408 (finding), and plugin-approvals mounts its ADR-0043 action pages (/api/v1/approvals/act) only through http.server getRawApp, so a hosted tenant kernel, which has none, answers 404 ROUTE_NOT_FOUND to every approval e-mail link #22438, which is now needs-user-decision under the domain:services seat.
• cloud#2709, the pin move, ruled B (6081163069): wait for ADR-0131 C7. The earlier move-now ruling is superseded on its premise.
  • The pins stay at 56bf27affb / 2063f7a96c, and PR feat(security): ADR-0090 D5/D9 suggested-audience-binding surface + confirm/dismiss API #2746 stays a draft as the v18 checklist.
  • The objectui half is released. On 2026-10-10 the maintainer approved in chat (「可以，开卡派发吧」) a measured move of .objectui-sha alone. It is filed as cloud#2755, with the scope note 6091747747 on cloud#2709. .objectstack-sha is unchanged.
  • The card is pm:blocked on objectstack#15211, and the waiting cards keep Blocked-by: #2709.
  • Recorded fallback: a lone backport of objectstack#22258 for cloud#2699 if it cannot wait.
  • Two prep items are dispatched now: cloud#2748 (flow template dialect on the pin, then the skill and graph-lint) and cloud#2749 (class-3/4 call-site census, recorded on cloud#1979).
• Re-pointed to Blocked-by: #2709: cloud#2699 (4f4c4ed819) and cloud#2634 (c7a3234a, not carried by feat(security): ADR-0090 D5/D9 suggested-audience-binding surface + confirm/dismiss API #2746's cut).
• In flight: none. cloud#2762 landed: PR [spec] Remove tenancy.strategy + tenancy.crossTenantAccess at the next major — no requirement (owner decision) #2763 merged through the queue as d43ce896 (text only: the composed-artifact refusal, its docblocks, the ledger comment and the pending changeset now say flattened-only, not planned), both staging planes green. PR [spec] Remove tenancy.strategy + tenancy.crossTenantAccess at the next major — no requirement (owner decision) #2763 has no assignee: the dev's assign was refused by the permission classifier and was not rerouted (reported to the maintainer).
• cloud#2759: part 1 landed (PR feat(rest): Excel 导出 select/status 字段带颜色(白底+选项色作字体色) #2761, b2e72f63, both staging planes green); part 2 dropped by the maintainer (「不做了」) and the card closed not planned by triage (6100468039); re-entry is a new card.
• cloud#2755 landed: PR feat(auth): 支持用户名/工号登录 —— 接入 better-auth username 插件 #2756 merged through the queue as 0dd7d2ba (.objectui-sha → d758f2f20dd1, framework pin unchanged), with both staging planes green (runs 38024419874 and 38024419888). The maintainer's census read zero on both planes (6093367277, with the control-plane.sql silent-mode fix applied to the PR body), and inline editing was ruled A (6093399692). Production follows cloud#2757's tag.
• cloud#2753 (ruling B, static-first round 1) is closed: code half PR Multi-org (enterprise) will re-hit #2734: tenant_isolation RLS strict equality still hides NULL-org platform rows once org-scoping is active #2754 37c706b9; the maintainer's reading 6091601965 hit the cache on the third conversation (13,791 of 13,794 tokens), the card's own retry rule.
  • cloud#2747 is closed. The maintainer ran the eval runbook (6082681300), and the pre-registered bar was applied as written (6083403702): V2 failed (golden build-step failures L 1 vs M 0), so quality did not hold, medium stays, and the fork was reported. Only a new pre-registered, larger-N run could revisit it, and only on the maintainer's word.
  • cloud#2748 (PR docs(adr): ADR-0091 (Proposed) — grant lifecycle: effective-dated assignments, delegation, break-glass, recertification substrate #2751, d3528e35) and cloud#2750 (PR /me/apps returns [] for every principal — reads metadata.list('app') while stack apps live in the engine registry (tabPermissions' only enforced consumer is dead) #2752, dce10383) have landed. cloud#2749 is closed; its census is on cloud#1979.
• Half-state patrol, 19:44Z sweep: the seven H52 rows on this lane's cards (1765, 2274, 2313, 2435, 2532, 2699, 2709) are answered on each card under an open_questions answered heading (6088256631 … 6088309589), each citing the ruling or seat answer that settled it. Still logged for a quiet round: the H44, H56 and H64 claim-format rows on chore(deps)(deps): bump the production-dependencies group with 17 updates #2158, docs(adr): ADR-0080 — AI-authored UI pages via JSX source (parse ≠ execute) #2435, build-console.sh 打包 console 时应注入本仓库 client,否则新 UI + 旧 client 漂移(11.5.0 已发生) #2512 and chore: version packages #2546, and H9 on chore: version packages #2546. The H26 transitive waits behind feat(mcp): OAuth 2.1 authorization for /api/v1/mcp — self-serve connect for claude.ai / Claude Desktop / Claude Code (#2698) #2709 → C7 are by design.
• Lane:
  • pm:queue 0;
  • pm:dispatched 0;
  • pm:blocked 8: 2709 2699 2634 2549 2435 2274 1979 1765;
  • pm:on-hold 6: 2546 2512 2367 2310 2265 1288;
  • pm:awaiting-maintainer 6: 2764 2757 2693 2377 2313 786;
  • pm:retriage 1: 2158 (the director seat's exit, 6109992821);
  • needs-user-decision 0;
  • target:v18 1: 1979.
• Released by the maintainer: PR [objectui/framework] enable.files: generic Attachments related-list (Salesforce Notes & Attachments parity) #2727 (cloud#2377) merged as fa31ff2f at 2026-10-11T14:50Z, and v1.36.0 was tagged on that commit at once.
  • deploy-heartbeat concluded success on fa31ff2f, and the two staging deploys ran on the merge.
  • deploy-cloud-prod and deploy-objectos-prod wait on the production environment's reviewer. ⛔ The seat never approves a deployment.
  • Once they are green: cloud#2377's done when holds (PR merged and the tag's deploy-cloud-prod success), the director seat exits it, and the Q3 revisit runs on a week of the day columns. cloud#2693 gets the seat's production /health A/B, the same probe as 6063261985.
• Round of the 2026-10-11 14:53Z patrol:
  • cloud#2764 was filed by triage as the heartbeat alert drill, the follow-up to cloud#2158. The seat moved it from pm:queue to pm:awaiting-maintainer (6110315332), because its one act is a production call with the admin secret.
  • The director seat exited two cards: it closed cloud#2020 and moved cloud#2158 to pm:retriage.
  • Upstream, objectstack#15211 (C7b) was re-pointed to Blocked-by: objectstack#15204 and refactor(plugin-email): templates resolve the registry; the seed and the provenance stamp retire; organization-level editing is closed (ADR-0131 D6/D10) #15205 (triage 6107769124). That broke the cycle between objectstack#15206 and feat(objectql,cli): inventory + migration — four fates per object, mirrors deleted only after the id→name rewrite is verified, per-table boot report (ADR-0131 D10) #15211. Both blockers are dispatched.
• Pin-pair rule (triage 6109772788 on cloud#2709):
  • .objectui-sha may pass objectui#12141's merge only in the same commit that moves .objectstack-sha to a commit carrying objectstack#22340 S2.
  • Until then, objectui-alone bumps stop at that merge's parent.
  • objectui#12141 is still an open issue, and the current pin d758f2f20dd1 predates it.
• Owed to the maintainer:
  • the production environment approval for v1.36.0's two deploys;
  • cloud#2757: with the tag cut, re-plan demo 363688d5 after those deploys are green (dedupe first, then backfill);
  • cloud#2764: the alert drill (POST /test?drill=1), with per-channel delivery and a person's receipt;
  • objectstack#22438 was ruled A + sweep (6079645593). It needs no cloud change; cloud#2549 waits on it, then on a pin.
• R45's ledger is carried by pointer, ⛔ not restated: the earlier body revisions and brief 6066326562.
• Harness: check-harness-current CURRENT at seating; charter touches SKILL.md 1bc6ca1d, references/ 5d5a88ef.

✅ harness 面 —— R41 本会话实测 CURRENT,四个面全中(⛔ R40 那张表已退役)

⚠️ 本会话是全新容器 + 全新检出(/home/user/objectstack,HEAD d8b12fca97)。git fetch origin main 后本检出落后 origin/main(f347c79)一个提交,而该提交不触碰任何 harness 面。check-harness-current.mjs(按事实 52 从 origin/main 取当前版本,连同 scripts/invoked-as.mjs 与整个 scripts/pm/ 落 scratchpad 后跑,⛔ 不是共享检出里那一份)整句读数:

check-harness-current: CURRENT -- every harness-loaded path on origin/main is in /home/user/objectstack HEAD d8b12fca97

⚠️ 本次多读到一条仪器自陈的限定,前三任的表里没有,记下来: 前三面那个「最新触碰 b3e437db2」是浅 clone 的嫁接边界 —— 它的父提交 f9a9e76fe 不在本检出里,git 于是拿它与空树比,于是该提交树里每一个路径都读成「在这里被触碰」。⇒ 那三行的 sha ⛔ 不是「这一提交改了这个文件」的证据(事实 39/46 在 harness 读数上的同一张脸)。作准的是每面第二行的内容比对 = HEAD content is identical to origin/main —— 它按内容判,与嫁接无关,而四面全部为真。⛔ 不要把嫁接边界当触碰读数往外引。

三章程文件的最新触碰 sha(git log -1 origin/main -- <path>,本次取数):SKILL.md 与 references/core-rules.md 同为 6427ee2(2026-09-18T01:15:42Z,同一提交)—— 与 R40 读到的一致;两份均已在本会话读过。

⭐ harness CURRENT 与「我能不能派 dev」是两件事(R40 的实测,原样保留):后者只取决于容器启动那一刻仓在不在盘上,只有一次探针能回答。本会话两件各自量过,都通过。

⛔ references/lanes/cloud.md 仍不存在:git ls-tree origin/main 复核,references/lanes/ 下只有 cli · devx · director · engine · hotcrm · services · skills · spec · triage · ui 十个。⇒ 本席的岗位说明只活在本贴的 范围 与 说明 两节,未按章程版本化到 references/lanes/。⛔ 席内不自行补写(references/** 是 domain:skills 车道的受管面),第四次记录在此供换班报告采信。

范围

cloud 全仓队列 + objectstack 上带 repo:cloud 的缝卡。执行座位 + 单车道机械三务自理;⛔ 不产 domain:*。⛔ 每轮两仓都读。

继承台账

⛔ Nothing in this section is inherited prose. R37's ledger (2026-09-07T06:4xZ) and the consolidation seat's restatement of it are both retired here: every line below is a reading taken at takeover, and the five items the two briefs handed forward were re-read one by one and are listed under Retired inheritance.

⚠️ 下面这张表是 R38 坐席那一刻（2026-09-15T15:03:50Z）的读数，⛔ 不是现值。 现值在收班简报第 1、3、8 节（读数 2026-09-16T16:1x–16:2xZ）：pm:queue 42 · pm:dispatched 2 · pm:blocked 16 · pm:on-hold 11 · pm:awaiting-maintainer 18 · needs-user-decision 0 · pm:retriage 0。一班之内 41 张卡换了状态，⛔ 不要拿下表当盘点。

cloud board — R41 重取(2026-09-20T14:14Z,⛔ 09-18T16:12Z 那张表已退役)

objectstack 上带 repo:cloud 的缝卡 3 张 open,同刻读:#17148(priority:p2)· objectstack-ai/cloud#2521(priority:p3)· #17693(无优先级)—— 三张的 created_at 都在 09-09…09-11,⛔ 本轮无新增。另两张 #16084 与 #17072 已由本席本轮落地并关闭(89791f05 / dae1be3d,各自一父验过)。在飞 dev 0。

⭐ 本轮盘面上最大的一件事:决策箱被总监席整箱清空(9 → 0),队列随之从 29 涨到 38。 九条裁决的执行段本席逐条读过,四条与本席相关的约束记在这里,⛔ 不要从卡号自行推断:

• docs: align AI docs with open=MCP-only / in-UI AI=cloud (cloud ADR-0025) #2337 与 docs: close week-of doc gaps (os publish removal, RLS current_user, search, authz, SDUI, dataset joins, package-first) #2338 必须在 pin bump(chore(client): remove dead projects.* env-member SDK methods (ADR-0024 D9) #2332)之前或与之同时落地 —— 否则那次抬 pin 会静默停掉付费租户的包内定时任务。
• fix(analytics): boolean filters & group-by compare against real boolean, not stringified '1' #2287 的 PR ⛔ 只有拿到维护者对部署窗口的话才能翻 ready。
• fix(identity): sys_verification.value must not be UNIQUE — breaks OIDC authorize (503) #2333 的 objectui 横幅卡由本席在数据那半落地后再立。
• fix(rest): register static data-action routes before greedy :object/:id #2315 转 pm:blocked,阻塞者是 pin bump;⚠️ 它被转态时没有 Blocked-by: 行(只有提案里的一句散文),本席已按裁决原文补上 Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#2332 + Unlock-action:,并写明解锁要读 pin 侧判据、⛔ 不是只看卡号关没关。

R41 本轮台账

合计 —— REST 实测,2026-09-20T14:14Z(⛔ 下面四段 09-18T16:12Z 的明细保留作历史,不是现值)

本轮关卡 42 张:cloud 40 张(1876 1977 1997 1999 2041 2174 2262 2271 2272 2281 2283 2289 2297 2309 2322 2324 2326 2328 2333 2334 2338 2339 2342 2344 2345 2348 2352 2354 2356 2359 2361 2365 2366 2374 2382 2388 2389 2391 2392 2394)+ objectstack 缝卡 2 张(#16084 · #17072)。同期 cloud 合入 PR 41 个(#2357…#2421;取数窗口回溯到 2026-09-12,⛔ 不是被 100 条分页截断的下界)+ objectstack 侧两个(89791f05 · dae1be3d)。本轮新立 cloud 卡 17 张(2359 2361 2365 2366 2367 2369 2370 2372 2374 2377 2382 2388 2389 2391 2392 2394 2396)+ 上游 objectui#9954。

⚠️ 「关卡 42」与「合入 41」之间 ⛔ 不存在一一对应,本次也没有去建。 有的 PR 是工具链/文档、根本不挂卡;有的卡是按裁决或重复关的,没有 PR。⇒ 要知道哪张卡落在哪个 PR,⛔ 逐张读卡,不要从这两个数推。

09-18T16:12Z 的明细(历史)

落地 5 张:#1977(棘轮改为量运行时真正发出的前缀;⛔ 人工地板守住,ceiling 一字没抬;真实余量 94 字符不是 688)· #2272(不存在的桶启动时响亮报出,凭据脱敏与功能同笔落)· #2174(退役 cloud#2069 迁移;⭐ 退役单位是 9 个文件不是 1 个,check:migration-has-invoker 的定义就是权威)· #2354(extend 模式两张推断表 + gantt 降级披露)· #2348(stream_chat 写 ai_traces;⭐ 连带退役了从来没有任何东西能发出的 embed operation)。

新立 6 张:#2359(决策卡,已裁 N 并关闭 —— 探测停在日志,⛔ 不建部署门/容器侧端点/Worker 里的 SigV4;留具名再触发)· #2361(restore_environment 不发信号 ⇒ 恢复后仍答归档 409 页)· #2365(NEW 模式 gantt 降级无人披露;复现已在树里,把一条不变量断言反过来即可)· #2366(composed-artifact-agents 的 cloud#1453 块吃 5000ms 默认值而兄弟块写了 60_000)· #2369(空 pricing 对象把每次调用算成恰好 0 且不打 cost_unpriced)· #2370((c) 类,Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#2337 —— graph-lint 告诉作者模型时钟触发器是 best-effort,抬 pin 后它们根本不会被武装)。

转态 3 张:#2172 → pm:blocked(⭐ pin 不覆盖:build-progress.zod.ts 在 main 上 200、在 pin bdea10a1 上 404,阳性对照 agent.zod.ts 两边都 200;⛔ 解锁判据写成「在新 pin 上重读那条路径」而不是「#2332 关了」)· #2352 → pm:queue(它自己写死的判据「#1999 离开 needs-user-decision」已命中;⚠️ 继承的简报说该卡由 #1999 的裁决同笔放回,而裁决执行段原话是 「cloud#2352 is untouched.」 ⇒ 本席按卡自己的判据动,不按继承的句子)· #2021 补 Blocked-by: objectui#9868(原文只有散文描述)。

释放 1 张:#2337 —— dev 一行代码未写即停在停手条款上,而理由经本席复核成立:上游开关是零参数、活读 env 的全局函数(resolveScheduledWorkEnabled(): boolean / resolveScheduledWorkPolicy(): ScheduledWorkPolicy),五个消费者全部零参数调用,而托管运行时是一个进程装最多 50 个混合档位内核(OS_KERNEL_CACHE_SIZE: '50')⇒ 逐环境的值无处可放。⛔ 裁决方向未动,不可执行的是「在 cloud 的一个接线点上做」这句机制。卡已带四棱块回箱等 ①/②/③/④。

⛔ 开着的 8 个 PR —— 全是 draft,没有一个是本席能合或能入队的(2026-09-20T14:14Z 逐个实测)

⭐ 治理面 PR 的「人工合并」本身就是复核记录(一条命中即整 PR 分叉),⛔ 席位不翻 ready、不入队、不挂 auto-merge。cloud 的四行治理面:AGENTS.md · CLAUDE.md · .claude/** · docs/adr/**。

⚠️ #2396 / #2290 / #2282 三张是 [finding] + Bug,派发时没有裁决,也不欠裁决(文档与实测代码矛盾是缺陷,不是决定)。本席 2026-09-20T13:1x 已各补一条说明把这一点写在卡上,免得后来人把「判过不需要」读成「漏了一次裁决」:5750011261 / 5750011378 / 5750011503。

两条各等一件只有维护者能做的事(原文保留)

• PR feat(spec): blueprint dashboard widget gains explicit measure/groupBy slots #2360(Schema sync is additive-only: non-additive metadata changes (required→optional, type, drop, rename) silently diverge from existing DBs; need drift detection + os migrate #2186 suspend):CI 绿、clean、仍 draft。裁决 5696429518 要求落地 PR 陈述「当前 suspended 环境计数」与「其中是否有任何一个在被暂停后仍服务过流量」——本席与 dev 各自实测都够不到生产面(阳性对照:生产 host 传输失败而同一客户端读 api.github.com 得 200)。零 ⇒ 原样入队;非零且有流量 ⇒ 是破坏性变更、需通知窗口,那是新决定,⛔ 不是回退到 B 的许可。
• PR feat(plugin-auth): password complexity policy (ADR-0069 D1, P1) #2368(fix(service-ai): estimate non-zero token usage in MemoryLLMAdapter #2000 定价):CI 绿、clean、仍 draft,且这是刻意的 —— docs/adr/** 在 diff 里 ⇒「混合 diff 一条命中即整 PR 分叉」⇒ 受管落地,⛔ 席位不翻 ready、不入队、不挂 auto-merge。⭐ 它顺带查出:价目表从一个没有任何部署会传的 option 播种 ⇒ 全舰队注册表一直是空的。缺的 luna 费率是后续数据行,⛔ 不扣住合并。

⚠️ State-machine breakages visible at takeover (to verify before repair, ⛔ not to be repaired blind)

The six states (pm:queue · pm:dispatched · pm:blocked · pm:on-hold · pm:awaiting-maintainer · needs-user-decision) are mutually exclusive, and finding means awaiting first triage — triage removes it. Five rows break that, and R37's warning about #2135 still stands verbatim: ⛔ do not guess which half is right; read the card and its comments first, and when in doubt treat it as awaiting a ruling, because mis-dispatching a card that is waiting on a ruling costs more than dispatching a ruled card late.

• needs-user-decision + pm:queue: fix(setup): first-run admin polish — nav pin, widget service-gate, i18n, settings PUT envelope #2249
• pm:blocked + pm:epic: docs(ui): drill 'Open in list' escape hatch + unified report drill #2135 (the card R37 named; the pair has changed shape since, it read pm:queue + needs-user-decision then)
• finding + a pm state: ci(release): pre-publish backward-compat smoke against live hotcrm (#2035) #2093, fix(examples): typecheck example apps clean + gate in CI #2023 (pm:on-hold), docs(adr): ADR-0053 — Phase 2 detailed design (reference-timezone model) #1975 (pm:blocked)
• pm:done while still open: chore(spec): refresh api-surface snapshot for aggregation-policy exports (#2208 follow-up) #2209, fix(release): push version tags in one atomic push (avoid commit_refs race) #2195 — both P0 credential-leak cards, both assigned hotlong. ⛔ pm:done is not one of the six; whether it is a legitimate closing marker in this repo or a half-state is a reading this seat owes.
• pm:dispatched with no assignee: fix(setup): drop Advanced nav entries for non-listable objects (verifications, device codes) #2266, chore(deps)(deps): bump the production-dependencies group with 17 updates #2158, fix(runtime): surface code-defined datasources on the host-config boot path (ADR-0015 §18) #2157 — dispatched by someone between R37's stand-down and now. ⛔ Not this seat's to touch until the claim comments say whose they are; a card with a live claim belongs to its claimant.

objectstack seam cards carrying repo:cloud — ⚠️ 现为 3 open(2026-09-20T14:14Z 重数;下表是坐席那一刻的 5 张,⛔ 其中 #16084 与 #17072 已由本席落地关闭)

⚠️ #13285 已于 2026-09-17T09:37:22Z closed / completed(本次逐张读,标签仍是 priority:p2 · repo:cloud · domain:spec)⇒ 它已离表,下面只剩 5 张。其余五张的读数是 R38 那一波的,⛔ 派发或转态前逐张重读。

⛔ All eleven were worked in wave R38-1; none was looked at and put back. Five are closed and nothing is in flight; every card still open carries a published reading and a named owner.

Closed this wave: #13272 · #15861 · #16852 · #17233 · #17045. Filed this wave: #18304 (agent.tools re-grade, triage's) · #18309 (CLOUD_PROVIDED_OBJECT_NAMES, both directions) · #18314 (a gate script unrunnable from an agent container). #13272 landed — PR #18313 merged 2026-09-15T16:49:13Z as 863c7c44; verified on main (21 stamps present, agent.tools still unstamped with status: live), pm:dispatched + assignee stripped by hand with the read-back, status returned to the domain:spec seat (5684343147).

Unblocked elsewhere: #15858 (domain:cli, pm:blocked) — its blocker was a reading this seat could take; delivered as 5683116026. ⛔ Its label transition is that seat's.

Retired inheritance — the five items both briefs handed forward, each re-read 2026-09-15T15:06:16Z

热文件串行队

None declared —— 2026-09-18T09:36Z 复核后退役。 R39 中途（评论 5722063008）在 packages/service-ai/src/tools/visualize-data.tool.ts 上声明过一条队：1. cloud#2092 → 2. cloud#2093。本次逐张读回：两张都已 closed / completed（#2093 以 6a0ff9e0 落地），队列的两端都没了。⇒ 队退役。

同笔复核了那条评论里的另外两张在飞卡：cloud#2023 已 closed completed；cloud#2179 仍 open，现为 pm:blocked + pm:blocking、无 assignee，⛔ 已不在飞。⇒ 本贴写下这一刻，本车道在飞 dev 为 0。

下一任若发现两张 open 卡共用一个热文件，在此声明：文件 → 有序卡号 → 每张卡认领的区域。

说明

⛔ 本仓平台事实(接管者先读;【R37】为本班实测)

1. enable_pr_auto_merge 才是进队动作,唯一可靠读数 = event: merge_group run。队列按顺序逐个合。
2. closing keyword 会静默不生效 ⇒ 合并后逐卡核 state;反向同真(27)。
3. 读 main 与 pin 一律走 API。
4. sanitizer 吃裸尖括号;反引号代码块内的 <sha>/<path> 存活。
5. RouteDefinition.permissions 零消费。
6. cloud 无 dispatch-gates.mjs、无仓级 lint ⇒ 门禁按 diff 从 check:* + test.yml 推导。
7. blocked 卡的交付常以别的卡号落地 ⇒ 问「交付物在 main 上吗」。
8. 覆写判据 = 因由是否在同一动作里。
9. hotcrm 经 add_repo;objectui 不可写 ⇒ 缝卡。
10. GraphQL 限流时 REST 仍通;/search/issues 403。
11. 跨座位交接落卡不落贴。 12. pin 选择双向审窗(feat(objectql): opt-in sys_metadata hydration for isolated project kernels #1826)。 13. 读数缝卡按家族折叠。 14. ObjectLogger 是类。
12. 提示词棘轮 上限已由 epic 车道抬到 60,250(feat(dogfood): in-process runtime regression gate #2020,定过价的例外,⛔ 不继承)。
13. flow config 开放 record;flow.zod.ts ≠ job.zod.ts id 空间。
14. run 级 updated_at 不是活性信号,读 job steps。
15. list_pull_requests.merged 不可信;认 merged_at+closed。
16. 舰队级 529:单独重派是判别实验;保留认领+note。
17. packages/service-ai-studio/src/skills/ 不是 governed 面。
18. pnpm --filter PKG typecheck test 把 test 当参数 ⇒ 分两条命令。
19. 核验框架/objectui 无需 clone:curl raw.githubusercontent.com/...。
20. JobSchedule 文件头自证事实 16。
21. 测试接缝没人守 ⇒ 静默死掉而依赖它的测试全绿。
22. 门禁首合取项若是「模型自己的行为」,门就是模型可自行关掉的。
23. MCP 断连静默断掉定时器链;醒来先 list_triggers;送达延迟 0–14 分钟常见。【R37 复现:本班 MCP 掉线一次,重连后继续,无状态损失】
24. Part of 不保证不关卡 ⇒ 合并后 close-verify 一律读 state。
25. 剥标/回读类小写动作与触发读数同一批发出。
26. ⛔ 三参旧式 git merge-tree 对 add/add 与内容冲突报 0。 一律 git merge-tree --write-tree --name-only <A> <B>。
27. 解锁扫描读到评论最后一页:先问「有没有裁过没执行的」。
28. 维护者会在同一分钟用两个授权账号连做多件事。
29. createRequire 到 dist/index.cjs、静态 import 到 dist/index.js = 两份模块实例。
30. 框架文件不在 cloud 里:派发令写文件面前对 cloud 树 find 一次。
31. body 编辑不撤回 PR 建立时登记的 auto-close 链接。
32. 另一 PM 车道可能不读线程就认领并开 PR;closed_by_pull_requests 是最早信号。
33. arm 不是终点:队列前面的 PR 落地可让本 PR 静默 dirty。
34. disable_pr_auto_merge 不出队;代理禁 ref 删除。
35. settings 两层门是框架设计:托管内核声明 11 个 namespace。
36. 【R37】容器里的 /home/user/objectstack 是浅 clone(55 commits)。 窗口化 git log / merge-base 在它上面以 exit 0 无警告答错 —— 本班就先拿到过一个假的「未找到」。pin 祖先判定必须先 git fetch --deepen=3000(只加对象,不动 HEAD/工作树,安全)或走 REST compare。⛔ 浅检出上的 merge-base 不是 pin 读数。
37. 【R37】apps/objectos 的 test = preflight && vitest run,而 test:crm-bundle / test:boot-smoke 等是 tsx 脚本,vitest 不收集它们。 CI 只跑 boot-smoke + cloud#1650 提升的三个 tsx 门(production-flow / billing-flow / cloud-app);test:crm-bundle 无人跑。test.yml 自己的注释已记过同类:「it is test:boot-smoke, not test, which is how it sat red for three weeks unnoticed」。⇒ 事实 24 的活体实例,查「这个测试真的在跑吗」。
38. 【R37】cloud 无 priority:p1 标签(只有 priority:p0)。⛔ 不要凭记忆挂,严重度写进评论正文。
39. 【R37】dev 开的 PR 作者是 claude[bot],不是席位账号 ⇒ 对 os-zhuang 请审不会触发 author-identity 422,两个授权账号都能正常请审(本班实测两个都进了 requested_reviewers)。
40. 【R37】MCP update_pull_request 带 reviewers 时显式传 draft: true 能保住草稿位(回读确认 draft 仍为 true)。⛔ 仍要回读,不认 200。
41. 【R37】issue/PR 号不可预测:本班在评论里引用了一个尚未创建的卡号并写错(预测 fix(driver-sql): self-heal numeric type fidelity on legacy SQLite columns + extend dogfood matrix #2028,实际 ci: run ESLint in CI to enforce the @objectstack/spec import guard #2029,而 fix(driver-sql): self-heal numeric type fidelity on legacy SQLite columns + extend dogfood matrix #2028 恰好被同批的 PR 占走)。先创建再引用,写错了就公开更正。

⛔ Platform facts added by R38 (English from here down; 存量中文事实 1–44 above are 不追溯改写)

45. REST is OPEN to BOTH repos from this seat's container, probed 2026-09-15T15:02:53Z: GET /repos/objectstack-ai/cloud/issues → 200, GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/6026 → 200, /rate_limit → core 15000/h (the App-install bucket, so not the MCP user bucket). ⇒ The vacancy reason this post's title carried for six days — "repo not attached" — was an attribute of that session, not of this lane. ⛔ Never inherit a reachability verdict from another session; probe once per session, and ⛔ 仓不可达 is never "checked and clean".

46. Both container checkouts are shallow, 50 commits each — /home/user/cloud at cb8ee7ff and /home/user/objectstack at 827cacbf, read 2026-09-15T15:08:47Z. Platform fact 39 (shallow clones answer merge-base and windowed git log wrongly at exit 0) therefore applies to both repos now, not just objectstack. Deepen (git fetch --deepen=3000) or go through REST compare before any ancestry claim.

47. create_trigger warns "this trigger stores no MCP connectors" even for a self-bound timer, and for that shape the warning is not a defect: a self-bound firing resumes THIS session, with this session's tools. It is exactly the silent-zero-output failure seat-post-protocol.md names only for a fresh-session Routine. ⛔ Do not read the warning as "the timer is broken", and ⛔ do not read a created id as an armed timer either — read it back.

48. The heartbeat Worker and production deploy on different triggers (R45, cloud#2377): deploy-heartbeat.yml deploys on any push to main under apps/heartbeat/**, while deploy-cloud-prod.yml:34-38 deploys only on a v* tag. So a PR that lands a TARGETS row together with the route change it probes arms the probe against the OLD production build until the next tag. ⛔ Never arm auto-merge on such a PR by reflex: land it right before a tag, or split it.

49. This seat's REST token cannot read objectui issues (R45): GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/N answers "access not enabled for this session", and add_repo grants anonymous git reads only. ⇒ A Blocked-by: line naming an objectui card is unverifiable from here. Read its state through the triage seat's unlock scan, or attach objectui with access: push; ⛔ never write the line from memory (cloud#2172 was blocked on a card closed 11 days earlier).

50. PUT .../pulls/{n}/ccr/auto_merge IGNORES merge_method. Measured both spellings on PR fix(spec): the 21 confirmed cloud citations in the agent/skill/action liveness ledgers carry a read date and a symbol anchor #18313 at 2026-09-15T16:31:00Z: {"merge_method":"SQUASH"} and {"merge_method":"squash"} each return 200 echoing "merge_method":"merge", and the PR's stored auto_merge.merge_method reads back merge. rest-channel.md documents the SQUASH payload; that value does not stick. ⚠️ Harmless here — the merge QUEUE decides the method, allow_merge_commit is false and origin/main's first-parent history is linear — but ⛔ never read that echo as confirmation that a method was set.

51. An aggregator job reports FAILURE when its lanes were CANCELLED by a superseding push. TypeScript Type Check and Test Core run no compiler and no test: each reads the jobs named in OS_AGGREGATOR_MEMBERS and fails if any did not conclude success. Measured three times this wave. ⇒ A red aggregator on a superseded head is a supersede artifact, ⛔ not a gate finding — read the members per shard before diagnosing. On 97b17e9e, Test Core (4/6) succeeded and the other five were cancelled; no shard failed at all, yet two checks read failure.

52. A PR body PATCH re-triggers the PR-metadata gates (Check Changeset, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, Part-of PR must not also close its card, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path). Budget a body edit like a push, and ⛔ do not spend one late in a run to add a sentence.

53. ⭐ Two pushes to one PR cost two supersede cascades. This seat sent a dev two follow-ups (anchors, then notes) instead of one batch; each push cancelled an in-flight run and produced a red aggregator on the head it superseded. ⇒ Batch every correction from one review pass into ONE follow-up.

⛔ Platform facts added by R39 — every one measured this round

52. ⭐ 全板工具链住 objectstack，而共享检出会悄悄过期 —— 跑它之前先确认它就是 origin/main 的那一份。 R39 实测：/home/user/objectstack 的 HEAD 落后 origin/main 293 个提交。用检出里那份 check-half-states.mjs 扫 cloud 得 20 行；把 origin/main 的同名脚本取出来扫同一块板得 70 行。⇒ 50 行本来看不见，而且旧仪器的一条 H44 还指错了评论。做法：git show origin/main:scripts/pm/<tool>.mjs 连同 scripts/invoked-as.mjs 与整个 scripts/pm/ 落到 scratchpad 再跑（⛔ 不改共享检出；PM 不写仓内文件）。⚠️ 那份副本的 --self-test 会有 1 条 H43 失败并自陈原因（sibling-repo 副本不带 governed 名册），其余 4962 条通过。
53. ⛔ 差一点据一件过期仪器立卡。 旧版 H44 的时间戳正则是 /\b\d{2}:\d{2}(?::\d{2})?Z\b/ —— 它读不到本协议自己规定的分钟粒度写法 …T09:30Z（T 与紧随的数字之间没有 \b），却能读到带秒的写法。origin/main 早已修成 (?:\b|(?<=T))。⇒ 与 cloud#2130 的「对照组是被测物的副本」、cloud#2356 的「假阳性落在对照组上」同族：仪器本身可能是坏的那一个，而它照常 exit 0。
54. dispatch-gates.mjs --repo 是断言，不是开关。 源码原话：「refuse unless this checkout IS that repo」，⛔ 它不会把推导指向另一个检出。⇒ cloud 的门禁名册仍须按 cloud 自己的 package.json + .github/workflows/ 手工推导（本贴事实 6 仍然成立），但现在会响亮拒绝而不是给一个「完整、exit 0、完全错误」的答案。⚠️ 它还 import 同目录兄弟模块（如 scripts/i18n-bundle-surface.mjs），scratchpad 副本要一并取。
55. 所有权标记只认行首 Claim:；## Claim 这种标题形从来没被数进去过。 当前仪器把这类近失逐条列出：本板 4 条 —— chore(client): remove dead projects.* env-member SDK methods (ADR-0024 D9) #2332 5723350272、fix: single-tenant audit follow-ups — member/invitation org optional + headOf org-scope (ADR-0057) #2182 5723363219、chore: version packages #2179 5721976320 皆为 heading-bare，feat(automation): screen-flow runtime — interactive screen nodes (suspend→render→resume) #1452 5356755552 为 separator 形。⇒ 认领评论里 Claim: 与 Branch: 各自独占一行、行首起，⛔ 不要写成 ## Claim。
56. PATCH /repos/{o}/{r}/issues/{n} 经本代理必须显式带 -H "Content-Type: application/json"，否则答 "Request bodies must declare Content-Type"。
57. cloud 的半状态巡查锚 cloud#2293 至今是占位 —— 仓库变量 HALF_STATE_ANCHOR_ISSUE 未设（维护者动作），所以每次定时跑都在 Resolve the anchor 步骤响亮失败，发现物留在 step summary 里没人读。⇒ 本席每轮的「先读巡查锚」只能靠自己跑那支脚本（按事实 52 的做法），⛔ 不能读作「锚是干净的」。同族：cloud#2294（变量）与 cloud#2295（副本落后 + governed 名册缺失导致 H43/H48 在本仓 NOT MEASURED）。
58. 当前仪器在 cloud 上自报两条 RATE PREMISE DRIFTED：MEASURED_MERGES_PER_DAY = 137.5/day（2026-08-23 钉）对实测 ~10.3/day（0.07×），MEASURED_CLOSED_ISSUE_UPDATES_PER_DAY = 139.4 对 16.0（0.12×）。⇒ 它每一处「本窗口覆盖 N 天」的自述在本仓都按同样倍数说错。⛔ 常量住 objectstack，重钉是 domain:skills 车道的事，⛔ 本席不代改；读它的窗口自述时按倍数打折。

⛔ Platform fact added by R40 — measured this round

59. ⭐ 一个没带 source_url 建出来的席位会话,mode:subagent 整期是死的,且会话内修不好。 R40 实测:create_session 未带 source_url ⇒ 容器启动时零仓 ⇒ .claude/agents/os-dev.md 不在盘上 ⇒ agent 名册里没有 os-dev。Agent 答 Agent type os-dev not found. Available agents: claude, claude-code-guide, Explore, general-purpose, Plan, statusline-setup。把定义从 origin/main 逐字装到 ~/.claude/agents/ 与 /home/user/.claude/agents/ 两处之后再探,答案一字不变 ⇒ 名册只在会话启动时建一次,⛔ 不重扫。对照:R39 的 session_01TAUTP6Yky8QWoHUAPDKNJQ 的 session_context.sources 是 objectstack · cloud · objectui(origin: desktop_app),它整轮派得动;R40 的是 [](origin: claude_code_mcp_seed)。⇒ 建继任会话必须带 source_url(objectstack —— 它才是 .claude/agents/ 与全板工具链的住处);cloud 在会话内 add_repo + clone 即可。 ⚠️ 并且:坐席后、认领任何卡之前,先发一次最便宜的 os-dev 探针(要求回一个词就停)。⛔ 不要先认领再发现派不出去 —— R40 就是这么在 cloud#1977 上留下一个半状态的(已按 Release: 干净回滚,评论在卡上)。

⛔ 长期禁令(跨任期)

不得设 OS_MCP_SERVER_ENABLED;⛔ 永不伪造 Origin / 设 OS_TRUSTED_ORIGINS;⛔ 永不放宽 auth 断言;钉缺陷测试 promote never repair;⛔ positions ?? roles 回退禁;⛔ 永不编辑 content/docs/releases/;governed 面 PR ⛔ 永不自行入队;⛔ 永不弱化 cloud#1265 守卫;⛔ 不删 .changeset/*.md。

⛔ Permanent notes(跨任期,判例)

卡面反事实也要实测;零命中必带阳性对照(R37 两次靠它拿到真读数:/api/v1/environments/ 的真零,与浅 clone 的假零);dev 偏离更强则背书,但背书不等于照单全收;本席自己的判断过宽/过错就当场自更正(R37:Blocked-by 前提证伪,已在 #2029 公开更正);hold 只认最近转换条件;停手条款是契约一部分;blocked 解锁 = 交付物在 ref 上,pin 消费的仓再加一问「pin 覆盖了吗」;设计卡 cloud 腿「designed blind」先复核;「enforce」实施前先找接缝;定级时核「spec 里没有」这类前提;门禁类修复的 CI 绿可能什么都不证明;声称「已裁决」缺出处三件即不采信;复核时决定性前提自己再测一遍(R37:ADR-0112 D6 第 99 行逐字核);「正确但靠手抄」是没钉住的缺陷(本仓已开三张同类:#1932 #1949 #1995);收紧前先找反向那一轴;翻 ready 前亲核首行,合并后仍读 state;已裁未执行的裁决,解锁时先执行再谈重判;维护者点名保留的面,⛔ 席内不得代认,哪怕 dev 的论据成立;epic 车道领地内的卡:定级是本席机械义务,派发是它的。

迁移注记:本贴自 #4604 迁移(2026-08-06)。R36 于 09-04T07:5xZ 收尾空席;R37 于 09-07T05:41Z 坐席并在首个 wave 边界重写正文,新增平台事实 39–44。
R38 seated in the same stroke that rewrote §1–§3 under 接管压缩, and added platform facts 45–47.
R38 也补了 48–51。R39 于 2026-09-18T09:36Z 收班：重写「当前 PM」与 harness 两节、退役 R38 的盘点表、新增平台事实 52–58，并把决策箱补成 12/12 带卡面速读与四棱块。⛔ 本次未动「说明」下的既有事实 1–51 与两段禁令。
R40 于 2026-09-18T09:45Z 坐席（全新会话 + 全新检出）：重写「当前 PM」、把 R39 的 harness STALE 表换成本会话实测的 CURRENT 表、建自绑巡查 Routine trig_01EbZZ6xCoceHtcJzx6EZgnK 并记入正文，同笔记下 references/lanes/cloud.md 缺席这一缺口。⛔ 本次未动「范围」「继承台账」「热文件串行队」「说明」四节的任何既有内容。
R40 于 2026-09-18T10:00Z 收班:重写「当前 PM」与 harness 两节、新增平台事实 59、建好带 source_url 的继任会话 session_01WEsBsV9NHgypgTitazMHbe。⛔ 本次未动「范围」「继承台账」「热文件串行队」与事实 1–58、两段禁令。
R41 于 2026-09-18T10:14Z 坐席(带 source_url 的新会话 + 全新检出,os-dev 探针 ALIVE):重写「当前 PM」与 harness 两节、把盘点表与缝卡表换成本席同批的枚举、建自绑巡查 Routine trig_015HUDAoCk6FW9G9SyaK4Wrf 并记入正文。⛔ 本次未动「范围」「热文件串行队」「说明」三节与事实 1–59、两段禁令,也未动「继承台账」里 State-machine 破损表与 Retired inheritance 两块的既有文字。

R41 于 2026-09-20T14:14Z 在任期内刷新读数(不是坐席也不是收班):盘点表、缝卡行、台账合计、PR 节与标题全部换成同一批 REST 实测值 —— 上一版停在 09-18T16:12Z,已落后约 46 小时,继任者照着读会把 42 张已关的卡当成在队。⛔ 本次未动「当前 PM」的坐席依据与判例、harness 表、「范围」「热文件串行队」「说明」三节、事实 1–59、两段禁令,也未动「继承台账」里 State-machine 破损表与 Retired inheritance 两块;09-18T16:12Z 的四段台账明细与决策箱清空那一块保留作历史,只在上面加了退役标注。
R41/R42 于 2026-09-30T06:07Z 收班:重写「当前 PM」为 ⏳ vacant + 接任台账、删巡查 Routine。⛔ 本次未动 harness 表、「范围」「继承台账」「热文件串行队」「说明」与事实 1–59、两段禁令。
R43 坐席 (opening marker 5906435762): rewrote 「当前 PM」 only. ⛔ No other section changed; the harness table is still R41's record, and R43's reading is in the opening marker.
R44 seated (session session_01Wxo1xhh2bU66T73q23jzE4): rewrote 「当前 PM」 only. ⛔ No other section changed.
R44 round-boundary refresh: rewrote 「当前 PM」 only.
R44 standby refresh (2026-10-03 05:23Z patrol): rewrote 「当前 PM」 only.
R45 seated (session session_011jobP72PwN3whNm55GetXQ, opening marker 6050833662): rewrote 「当前 PM」 only. ⛔ No other section changed.
R45 mid-shift refresh: rewrote 「当前 PM」 only.
R46 seated (session session_01WVbr5J6u8BHh8EyFtcWciH): rewrote 「当前 PM」 only. ⛔ No other section changed.
R46 round-1 boundary refresh: rewrote 「当前 PM」 only.

Generated by Claude Code