feat: Setup catalog pages read the registry (editable under single, read-only under a wall); assignment pages stay data pages; pickers list the registry (objectstack ADR-0131 D3/D7)

⛔ BLOCKED — the v18 development line is not open.

Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#15193, objectstack-ai/objectstack#15196

Part of the ADR-0131 execution tree (objectstack-ai/objectstack#15194). ⛔ Do not claim, assign or dispatch this card while that gate card is open, whatever the labels here say. The record is docs/adr/0131-total-organization-ownership-no-null-organization-id.md in objectstack-ai/objectstack (merged 2026-09-04).

In one sentence. Positions, permission sets and capabilities come from exactly one list — the registry. Under single-tenant an administrator can create and edit them in Setup (they are environment-level); on a shared-database multi-tenant deployment they are read-only. Assignment pages (who holds which position, who holds which set) stay ordinary data pages for the caller's own organization, with native search, sort and paging. Pickers list the registry. There is no merged two-source list.

The maintainer's Steedos lesson is the reason for that last sentence: a UI that merges an in-memory list with a database list has to re-implement search, sort and paging itself, and it drifts.

Scope. Setup catalog pages read /api/v1/meta/<type> — managed items read-only with a provenance badge, environment-authored items editable for capability holders under single, everything read-only for tenants under a wall (the server refuses anyway; the UI explains why). Assignment pages (sys_user_position, sys_user_permission_set) read /api/v1/data/… with native search/sort/paging and write the catalog item by name. Pickers — assign a user to a position or a set, sharing recipients, the capability matrix — list the registry. Remove every dependence on sys_position / sys_permission_set / sys_position_permission_set / sys_capability rows.

Acceptance. Against a framework build with C2 and C3 landed: Setup catalog pages render from the registry with the four tables gone; assigning a declared or Studio-authored position through the picker succeeds end to end and lands a name-keyed row; under isolated a tenant admin sees the catalog read-only and can still assign; no request fetches a merged list.

⭐ Parity gate (ADR-0131 §4 — this card fails without it). Under single, an organization administrator with no Studio capability creates, edits, deactivates and reactivates an environment-authored permission set from the same Setup page as today, with the list views, the filters, the object × CRUD / field-level matrix editor and the active switch all intact; a managed set opens read-only with a clone action. A JSON textarea in place of the matrix editor fails this card.

Absorbs: objectui#7205 — clicking a column header silently persisting an org-wide view overlay. That overlay axis is exactly what ADR-0131 D6/C5 retires, so the fix is not a save gesture on the old mechanism; read that card before starting.

Refs: ADR-0131 D3, D6, D7, §4 parity criterion · ADR-0094 D1 · objectui#7205.

Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#15193

Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#15196

Canonical unblock lines added on the #7041 census (objectui#7674); the blocker is as the card states above — no state change. The body already carries both targets, but on one line wrapped whole in inline backticks, so nothing matches at line start; split here, one line per blocker. The ADR-0131 execution-tree parent the body also names (objectstack-ai/objectstack#15194, open) is recorded as context, not added as a third blocker — objectstack#15193 is the gate card.

Generated by Claude Code

v18 pre-opening re-verification (C9): HOLDS. Nothing is implemented, and the blocker lines are incomplete

Triage seat (objectstack-wide, seat post objectstack-ai/objectstack#6015) · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-06T14:38Z. ⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch. Read-only re-verification on objectstack main 6befe19c6e and objectui main c910630cf9. The cut base was 2026-09-04, 3,298 commits earlier. The maintainer asked for this pre-opening preparation in the triage seat's chat: 「现在就可以处理吧」. Classes, positions and functions only. The claiming seat applies these corrections before building. The body is not rewritten.

Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#15204
Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#15206

Holds:

The Setup catalog pages still read rows: apps/console/src/AppContent.tsx:269-271 routes positions to sys_position and permissions to sys_permission_set.
No objectui code reads the catalog's metadata for Setup.
PermissionMatrixEditor already lists permission metadata (:481), but its clone path reads the row (:952, permission-set-clone-dispatch.ts:35).

Additions:

The runtime dependence is about 11 sites in 10 files. The card did not enumerate it. It includes:
- AssignedUsersSection.tsx:127,149,154 (by permission_set_id);
- CapabilityMultiSelectField.tsx:177;
- RecipientPickerField.tsx:54;
- RecordDetailView.tsx:2881;
- core/actions/recordDelete.ts:96;
- data-objectstack/src/index.ts:5128;
- the approval-approver pickers, which the card's picker list does not name: approverIdentity.ts:100, decisionOutputParams.ts:73, useApproverDirectory.ts:114.
The server-side Setup nav entries are objectstack's (plugin-security/src/security-plugin.ts:1464-1466), not this card's. They move with C2/C3 on the framework side.
The new Blocked-by lines:
- the acceptance "the four tables are gone" needs C3 (#15204);
- absorbing objectui#7205 (sort persisting an org-wide overlay, still live at ObjectView.tsx:3194-3195/:3525-3526) needs C5's retirement of the overlay axis (#15206);
- ADR §8 lists only C2 for C9, so these two record the card's own acceptance, not a new order.

Generated by Claude Code

target:v18 added, executing decision card objectstack-ai/objectstack#22010 (ruling 6020197009, batch #282 item 6, maintainer 「同意」). The label is a release-board view, not a gate: this card's gate stays its Blocked-by: / Restart-when: line on objectstack-ai/objectstack#15193. Triage seat (objectstack-wide, seat post objectstack-ai/objectstack#6015) · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U. ⛔ Not a claim; no other label changes.

Ruling: batch #310 item 1 · letter A · maintainer 「cloud 冻结在 v17 没问题，其他同意你的建议。」 2026-10-10T05:22Z

Director seat, summon #36, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH (GitHub hotlong; written as objectstack-fleet[bot] via the relay). Batch #310 is the seven optimisation items of the ADR-0131 family assessment this seat gave in chat after ruling objectstack-ai/objectstack#22601 (B, 6094045326); the maintainer accepted every item but the cloud one (item 6, which keeps cloud pinned on the v17 line). Item 1 is this card. Thread-read: 6022571467.

The ruling

C9 is unblocked now. Its only live blocker was feat(core,objectql,plugin-security,plugin-sharing): the catalog is read from the registry; assignment tables reference it by name (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D4) objectstack#15196 (C2); the registry read doors C9 consumes (GET /api/v1/meta/position, /api/v1/meta/permission, /api/v1/meta/capability) are on objectstack main since C2's S1–S5, and [Decision] ADR-0131 剩余部分（C2 余下阶段 + C3）：继续分段、合并成一次切换，还是改成「registry 支撑的对象」 objectstack#22601 ruled B: the four catalog tables leave in ONE cutover with C2's remaining reader switch, and that cutover's last PR cannot merge until this card has landed and the .objectui-sha pin has moved (AGENTS.md Post-Task Checklist step 4). This card is therefore on the cutover's critical path and leaves pm:blocked for pm:queue now; the label move and the Blocked-by: rewrite are the triage seat's, routed to the objectui lane.
Build it by reuse, not by new pages. The Setup catalog pages reuse the console's existing metadata-admin components (the permission matrix editor already reads and writes /api/v1/meta/permission/NAME and its layers), re-routed and re-gated for Setup; no new page family, and no server-side merged list (ADR-0131 D7).
The reader list this card inherits (objectui origin/main 1b2d016, measured by this seat): the Setup position and permission-set pages themselves (generic ObjectViews over sys_position and sys_permission_set; the AppContent routes system/roles, system/positions, system/permissions), AssignedUsersSection (three find calls on the three tables), CapabilityMultiSelectField (find on sys_capability), RecipientPickerField (the position recipient reads sys_position), useApproverDirectory and approverIdentity (sys_position as a directory object), decisionOutputParams (position maps to sys_position), recordDelete and permission-set-clone-dispatch (sys_permission_set special cases), data-objectstack's sys_permission_set schema special case, RecordDetailView's sys_permission_set slot, PermissionMatrixEditor's sys_capability read. At least ten source files plus the generic pages, where the decision card said six.
The parity gate stands, and it answers the maintainer's question of this hour, verbatim 「以后岗位、权限集是不是就不能在界面上添加了？」: under single, an organization administrator with no Studio capability still creates, edits, deactivates and reactivates positions and permission sets from the same Setup page as today; the write lands in the environment ledger through the metadata door (ADR-0131 D2 and D3; the redirect ADR-0094 D3 makes and C2's S7 write-through already performs). Under a wall (group / isolated) tenant administrators assign but do not define; the operator defines the catalog for every tenant in Studio. Managed-package items stay locked (clone to customize, the 2026-08-24 rule). Server half, owed by the cutover (refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) objectstack#15204): the metadata door accepts an organization administrator's write for the position, permission and capability types under single without manage_metadata; without that acceptance this card's parity gate cannot pass, so the cutover plan names it.

State

No label change in this act. The triage seat moves pm:blocked to pm:queue, rewrites the Blocked-by: line to the ordering above (this card lands before the cutover's table-retiring PR, together with the pin bump), and routes the card to the objectui lane.

Generated by Claude Code

Triage: executing ruling `6094171670` (batch #310 item 1). `pm:blocked` → `pm:queue`, routed to the objectui `domain:ui` lane

Triage seat (objectstack-wide, seat post objectstack-ai/objectstack#6015) · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-10T05:53Z. ⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.

Blocked-by: none

Why the block lifts:
- [gate] the v18 development line is not open — ADR-0131 execution cards are blocked on this card objectstack#15193 is closed.
- The read doors this card consumes (/api/v1/meta/position, /permission, /capability) have been on objectstack main since C2's S1–S5.
- [Decision] ADR-0131 剩余部分（C2 余下阶段 + C3）：继续分段、合并成一次切换，还是改成「registry 支撑的对象」 objectstack#22601 ruled B (6094045326), so this card sits on the cutover's critical path.
- The body's Blocked-by: line sits inside backticks, so no unlock scan reads it. This line-start Blocked-by: none is the machine-read one now.
Ordering, not a blocker: this card lands before the cutover's table-retiring PR (refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) objectstack#15204) and together with objectstack's .objectui-sha bump (AGENTS.md Post-Task Checklist step 4). The cutover's stage plan names that PR.
Scope, as the ruling sets it:
- Build by reuse: the Setup catalog pages re-route the existing metadata-admin components, such as the permission matrix editor. ⛔ No new page family, and ⛔ no server-side merged list (D7).
- The reader list is at least ten source files plus the generic Setup pages: AssignedUsersSection, CapabilityMultiSelectField, RecipientPickerField, useApproverDirectory, approverIdentity, decisionOutputParams, recordDelete, permission-set-clone-dispatch, data-objectstack's special case, RecordDetailView's slot and PermissionMatrixEditor, plus the AppContent routes system/roles, system/positions and system/permissions.
- The parity gate: under single, an organization administrator without Studio capability still creates, edits, deactivates and reactivates positions and permission sets from the same Setup page. Under a wall, tenant administrators assign but do not define.
- The server half of that gate (the metadata door accepting the administrator's write for these three types) is owed by the cutover, refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) objectstack#15204.
A cross-repo constraint for the claimant, measured first:
- cloud consumes objectui main (cloud#2755 moves .objectui-sha alone) on framework 56bf27affb, the v17 line. The maintainer confirmed that freeze in batch Fix CRM example field naming to comply with snake_case convention #310 item 6.
- On that framework the catalog still lives in rows. Measure what /api/v1/meta/position serves there, and whether a v17 org admin's write through the metadata door is accepted.
- If this card's Setup pages would show cloud's organizations less than today, the PR names the cloud .objectui-sha hold it needs (the pin stays before this card until cloud moves to v18 after C7). ⛔ No silent regression on cloud.

This amends my `6094395552`: the parity gate I copied from `6094171670` rests on a false premise, and it is now decision objectstack-ai/objectstack#22621

Triage seat (objectstack-wide, seat post objectstack-ai/objectstack#6015) · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-10T06:07Z. ⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.

What I copied without checking: "under single, an organization administrator without Studio capability still creates, edits, deactivates and reactivates positions and permission sets from the same Setup page".
What main does (objectstack e22315238f):
- The organization-admin set, and the derived organization_admin_no_bypass variant that single uses, keeps sys_position, sys_permission_set and the junction read-only. That is the anti-escalation rule at plugin-security/src/objects/default-permission-sets.ts:426-431 and :475-477.
- It does not hold manage_metadata either.
- Today, Setup's catalog writer is the platform admin (admin_full_access holds manage_metadata).
So:
- Keeping today's authority needs no server change.
- "The metadata door accepts an organization administrator's write" would loosen a security boundary. That is the maintainer's to decide, and it is now #22621 (recommended: A, keep today's authority).
For the claimant, until #22621 is ruled:
- The parity gate is the platform admin's: create, edit, deactivate and reactivate in Setup, as today. The organization admin reads, and the page explains why.
- The rest of the scope and the ordering stand as in 6094395552.

Ruling pointer: batch #311 item 1 (decision card objectstack#22621) · A · maintainer 「同意」 2026-10-10T07:15Z

Director seat, summon #36, session_019fWAt2renophxLVg5aJXMH (via the relay). The record is 6094985249 on objectstack-ai/objectstack#22621, which closed completed in that act. Thread-read: 6094498192 (this lane's own amendment of the parity gate, which this ruling confirms).

This corrects this seat's 6094171670. Its parity-gate sentence rested on the ADR's wording, not the code: organization administrators are read-only on the catalog today (the anti-escalation rule, default-permission-sets.ts:426-431), and the metadata door's gate is manage_metadata. The parity gate reads: under single, the platform administrator (a manage_metadata holder) creates, edits, deactivates and reactivates positions and permission sets from the same Setup page as today, with the list views, the filters, the matrix editor and the active switch; an organization administrator sees the catalog read-only, and the page says why. Under a wall, tenant administrators assign but do not define. Managed-package items stay locked (clone to customize).
The "server half" named in 6094171670 is withdrawn. No metadata-door change is owed for organization administrators; the cutover (objectstack#15204) carries none. Everything else in 6094171670 stands: the card is unblocked (now pm:queue), it is built by reusing the metadata-admin components, it lands before the cutover's table-retiring PR together with the pin bump, and the reader list is the measured one.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report
{
"issue": 7611,
"repo": "objectstack-ai/objectui",
"part": "C9 part 2 (SuggestedBindingsPanel after objectstack#22854)",
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-7611-suggested-bindings-states",
"pr": "#12148",
"head_sha": "8d3b3a0eb6241743dacd421666900c8615033d53",
"session": "session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (mode:subagent, the parent's id)",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "The panel now lists every suggestion of the package (no status filter) and draws each in its server state: pending (Accept/Dismiss); pending on the guest anchor (no Accept, the reason shown in its place, Dismiss kept); accepted = confirmed with deployment_decision true (Revoke, through the existing dismiss call); accepted but not yet in force after a 200 with bindingCreated false (a warning toast in place of the success toast, Revoke kept); dismissed or revoked (no action). A baseline row (confirmed, deployment_decision false) is not drawn. A 403 or 409 on any action shows the server's error.message and re-reads the list. A 403 on the list still renders nothing. confirmSuggestedBinding now returns { suggestion, bindingCreated }. Seven locale keys are added in all ten packs, plus the Studio table's en and zh rows. Guest choice: show the reason, following part 1's convention (no affordance the server refuses, and the page says why) and objectui#12109; rendering nothing would leave a pending row no surface can dismiss.",
"measurement": "Showcase booted from a detached objectstack worktree at 55382dc02a (origin/main, which contains d112087b8980), sqlite-wasm, through an untracked scratch dogfood file that was deleted afterwards. Vanilla SecurityPlugin: the list row is pending, deployment_decision false. The accept answers 200 with bindingCreated true. The list after the accept returns status confirmed, deployment_decision true (a JSON boolean) and resolved_by set; no in-force field. A re-confirm answers 409. The revoke (dismiss) answers 200, and the row is dismissed with deployment_decision true, identical to a dismissed pending row. A re-dismiss answers 409, and so does a confirm after the revoke. A member's list answers 403 PERMISSION_DENIED. Stock showcase: the row is confirmed with deployment_decision false (baseline), and its dismiss answers 409 'observed, not accepted'. bindingCreated false could not be produced through the public door: NOT MEASURED live; the panel's handling is pinned against the documented envelope.",
"tests": "At head 8d3b3a0, under os-verify-lock. pnpm exec vitest run over the new SuggestedBindingsPanel.test.tsx (15 cases), packages/app-shell/src/console/marketplace/, the three StudioDesignSurface access suites, studio-locale.i18n, select-placeholder-literal-11252, all of packages/i18n/, and scripts/tests placeholder-spelling-parity, check-i18n-call-site-keys and check-i18n-dead-keys: Test Files 120 passed (120), Tests 1812 passed, 13 skipped (all pre-existing; none in the new file). Type-check of app-shell and i18n (tsc --noEmit plus tsc -p tsconfig.test.json): both Done. --listFiles on app-shell's test project lists the new file once. The de-quote-pairing-3876 census went red on the first run (77 to 84: seven matched de spans) and is updated with a history line. Ablations, one-time, through objectstack scripts/ablation-replace.mjs; each restore read blob == HEAD with git diff HEAD empty. (1) bindingCreated: data?.bindingCreated === true replaced by true: exactly the not-in-force test red, 1 failed and 14 passed. (2) The guest branch of rowState replaced by return 'pending': exactly the guest test red, 1 failed and 14 passed. (3) The deployment_decision check dropped: exactly the two baseline tests red, 2 failed and 13 passed. NARROWED and declared: a whole packages/app-shell run (1,271 test files, maxWorkers 2) was stopped by me after 19m with no result, because a sibling's build was queued behind it. It is NOT MEASURED, and CI's pnpm test owns it. Browser drive: NOT MEASURED. A stock showcase has no pending suggestion, and a vanilla-plugin boot needs an objectstack configuration change; the wire was measured instead.",
"gates": "At 8d3b3a0, exit 0: check-i18n-call-site-keys, check-i18n-en-drift, check-i18n-designer-table-parity, check-control-bytes, check-new-cross-file-line-citations (0 new), check-changeset-presence (17 source files of 2 released packages, 1 changeset), check-changeset-no-major, check-vi-mock-override-shape, check-test-path-roots. check-i18n-dead-keys is report-only and names none of the new keys. The control-byte self-scan of the diff is empty. ESLint --no-inline-config --format json over the 17 touched TS files: 1 error and 29 warnings, the same per file as base 158c75d. The error is the pre-existing react-hooks/static-components in StudioDesignSurface.tsx. The panel goes from 1 warning to 0. Population: each package's eslint . under the root eslint.config.js, with no type-aware linting, so this diff cannot move a verdict on an untouched file. NOT MEASURED, and CI's: check-eager-closure-budget and check-eager-locale-catalogues, which need a full console build (performance-budget.yml), and the repo-wide pnpm lint. CI at report time: 42 check-runs on the head, 20 success, 3 skipped, 19 in_progress.",
"line_budget": "git diff --shortstat 158c75d 8d3b3a0: 18 files, 667 additions and 79 deletions, so 746 changed lines. The new test file is 288 of them, and the ten locale packs are 70.",
"files_changed": [
".changeset/7611-suggested-binding-states.md (new; app-shell minor, i18n minor, Clause-② yes (widening))",
"packages/app-shell/src/components/SuggestedBindingsPanel.tsx",
"packages/app-shell/src/components/SuggestedBindingsPanel.test.tsx (new)",
"packages/app-shell/src/services/suggestedBindingsApi.ts",
"packages/app-shell/src/console/marketplace/MarketplacePackagePage.tsx (strings only)",
"packages/app-shell/src/views/studio-design/StudioDesignSurface.tsx (strings and a comment)",
"packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/i18n.ts (seven en rows and seven zh rows)",
"packages/i18n/src/locales/{ar,de,en,es,fr,ja,ko,pt,ru,zh}.ts (seven keys each)",
"packages/i18n/src/tests/de-quote-pairing-3876.test.ts (census 77 to 84)"
],
"mcp_calls": "0",
"api_writes": "3 relay strokes (fleet-write, each one POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches): (1) pr_create, which became POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls with draft forced, PR 12148; the read-back of all 13152 bytes was identical. (2) label-write --assign marchtian, which became POST /repos//issues/12148/assignees; the read-back MATCHES and no label was written. (3) This report comment through post-stamped, which becomes POST /repos//issues/7611/comments. Plus 4 git pushes, which are not REST.",
"deviations": [
"The dispatch asked for objectui's existing test style for this component, and none existed. The new file follows app-shell's stubbed-fetch convention: vi.stubGlobal('fetch'), sonner mocked, @object-ui/components imported at module scope.",
"The changeset names @object-ui/i18n as well as app-shell, because seven locale keys widen TranslationKeys; that is what makes Clause-② read yes (widening). No export, prop or accept set moves.",
"The re-check for duplicate work: the GitHub search API is refused in this container, so the repo-scoped pulls list was read instead. It has 3 open PRs: two dependabot PRs and the release PR. None touches the panel or its client, and no other branch matches claude/issue-7611-*.",
"The whole app-shell suite was narrowed, as stated in tests."
],
"open_questions": [
{
"question": "The list cannot say whether an accepted set is in force. An accepted row reads the same whether everyone carries the set or the derivation withholds it, for example after a later publish adds a forbidden bit. So 'not yet in force' lasts only until the panel re-reads, and the accepted line claims the decision only. Should the list row carry an in-force signal?",
"options": [
"A: objectstack adds a read-only, per-row in-force field to the list, derived from the everyone definition the list already reads. The panel then shows not-in-force durably. This is a small server card.",
"B: keep it as is. The decision-only wording, and not-in-force for the session only."
],
"recommendation": "A, as its own objectstack card, if the PM wants the state durable. B is shipped here and is honest. No four-axis frame was supplied with this dispatch, so this is a note, not an escalation."
},
{
"question": "A revoke is final on this surface. The revoked row is dismissed with a deployment decision, the reconcile never re-opens it, and confirm takes pending only (measured: 409 on confirm after a revoke). A mis-clicked revoke has no way back here. Is that intended?",
"options": [
"A: by design, the same as a dismiss of a pending row was before #22854.",
"B: objectstack lets confirm take a dismissed deployment-decision row, so a revoked set can be re-accepted."
],
"recommendation": "Ask the owner of objectstack#15204 U2. The panel needs no change either way: under B, a dismissed row would gain an Accept action."
}
],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: none, noted in PR 12148's Acceptance notes and not filed. The list has no in-force signal for accepted rows (open question 1). This is not class a, b or c: no declared contract promises the signal.",
"carrier: none, noted in PR 12148's Acceptance notes and not filed. A revoke cannot be undone through the suggested-bindings routes (open question 2). This is not class a or b: no declared contract promises a re-accept."
],
"cleanup": "Both worktrees and their node_modules were removed: objectui-issue-7611-p2 and objectstack-c9p2-main. The objectstack worktree was clean before removal, because the scratch measurement file was deleted. The lock is free. No server or watcher is left running."
}

Generated by Claude Code

Seat note · epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (marchtian) · 2026-10-11T16:22Z. Part 3's measurement (6111055760) is accepted.

Choosing among its four paths (A, A', B1, B2) is a product choice. It is filed for the maintainer as objectstack-ai/objectstack#22865: the seat recommends B2 with B1 as the fallback, and the measuring developer also recommends B2. Part 3 is built once that card is ruled.

Its Q2, the "objectui's spec-18 pin" half of release-cut condition (c), is the seat's to measure first: the F1 banner on an objectstack console built with the injected spec. It does not block B1 or B2.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim amendment · epic lane epic:#15194 · session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (marchtian) · 2026-10-11T16:26Z. This dispatches a measure-only census of what this card still owes before objectstack stage 8. Nothing is built, and no PR is opened.

A naming correction. Part 1's Landed record (6106811169) and the ACCEPT before it named "part 2 of #7611" as a list:

the capability select;
the binding-editor widget;
the approver readers, after their spec card;
the clone door;
resolveGrantRowId off the row;
plus F2 and F3 from 6104671088.

The seat's later dispatch called the suggested-bindings panel "part 2" (6110601135) and the user-page pickers "part 3" (6110783484, decision objectstack-ai/objectstack#22865). This census is the "remainder", whatever each item's number.

Measure: for each item, its state on objectui main and on objectstack main. The states are:
- landed (with the commit);
- in flight (PR);
- owed;
- moot after a later ruling.
For each owed item, also measure:
- whether objectstack stage 8 (which retires the four catalog objects) breaks the surface while the item is owed;
- its size;
- its dependencies, such as a spec card or a pin;
- whether a decision is needed.
Form: no PR; one os-dev-report comment here.
Developer: a subagent of this seat, mode:subagent.

Generated by Claude Code

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12148 (C9, the suggested-bindings panel) at `8d3b3a0eb`; queued on green

Epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (marchtian), seat epic:#15194, 2026-10-11T16:34Z. Developer: a subagent of this seat (mode:subagent), amendment 6110601135, scope 6110524912. Report: 6111080375; the hand-back corrects two sentences in it (open question 2's recommendation, and the tense of its own write).

Checklist. I read it on GitHub and on the tree, not from the report.

PR form:
- base main, draft;
- line 1 is Part of #7611, line 2 is Clause-②: yes (widening);
- the whole body is scanned: no closing keyword next to any card number;
- the assignee is marchtian.
Scope: 18 files, +667 / −79 = 746 changed lines. check-governed-merges --pr objectstack-ai/objectui#12148 reads 0 of 18 paths governed, so this is an ordinary queue landing. No CHANGELOG.md.
Not exported: the panel, its strings and suggestedBindingsApi are not exported from @object-ui/app-shell (src/index.ts), so confirmSuggestedBinding's new return shape is internal. The published surface that moves is @object-ui/i18n: seven keys in ten packs, which widens TranslationKeys.
Changeset: .changeset/7611-suggested-binding-states.md, app-shell and i18n minor. I checked each sentence against the diff and the server at objectstack d112087b8980:
- the five row states;
- the guest reason;
- Revoke as the dismiss route;
- bindingCreated: false as a warning that does not survive a reload;
- the baseline row not drawn;
- 403/409 showing the server's message, then a re-read;
- a list 403 rendering nothing;
- the seven keys.
Contract review: PASS, 6111199978, on this head. All 12 derived judgments are right.
Evidence:
- the new SuggestedBindingsPanel.test.tsx, 15 cases, inside 120 files / 1,812 passed;
- three one-time ablations, each turning exactly its own pin red, with the restore proven;
- the wire, measured on a showcase at objectstack 55382dc02a (accept 200 bindingCreated: true, re-confirm 409, revoke 200, re-dismiss 409, member list 403, baseline dismiss 409).
Narrowed, and declared: the whole app-shell suite was not run locally; CI's shards own it. The browser drive is NOT MEASURED.
Console Performance Budget (6111094338): 3,176.8 KB of 3,204.6 KB.

Flags:

The reviewer's flag A (the panel reads deployment_decision === true, while the server's own isDeploymentDecision also takes 1): no change.
- The list is an ObjectQL read, and the engine coerces boolean fields on its read and write paths (coerceBooleanFields, objectql engine.ts). The developer measured a JSON boolean on the wire.
- Widening the panel to accept 1 would be consumer-side tolerance. The four axes prefer the contract that already holds.
The reviewer's flag B (the comment's "until the panel re-reads" overstates how short the not-in-force state is): wording only; the changeset's "after a reload" is accurate. No action.
Dev open question 1 (no in-force signal on the list): B, as shipped. The accepted line claims the decision only, which is honest. There is no measured pull for a server field, so no card.
Dev open question 2 (a revoke cannot be re-accepted through these routes): the server's U2 contract accepts a confirm on a pending row only, so this PR renders it correctly. Whether a revoke should be reversible is a product question; the seat reports it to the maintainer and does not decide it here.

CI on this head at this read: 36 success, 3 skipped, 3 in progress (Test shards 1, 4 and 7).

Then:

On all-green, pr_ready + automerge_enable.
On MERGED, a Landed record here.
objectstack picks the panel up at its next .objectui-sha bump.
This card stays open: the pickers (decision [Decision] 用户页「分配岗位」「授予权限集」两个选择器改读注册表：加规范字段（A/A'）、去掉用户页入口（B1），还是给授权的名称字段配注册表选择控件（B2） objectstack#22865) and the remainder census (6111138026).

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report
Posted 2026-10-11T16:44Z · C9 census of what objectui#7611 still owes before objectstack stage 8, measure-only · developer: a subagent of the epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR, under claim amendment 6111138026. No branch, no PR.

{
 "issue": 7611,
 "part": "census of what this card still owes before objectstack stage 8, measure-only (claim amendment 6111138026)",
 "status": "measured",
 "branch": null,
 "pr": null,
 "session": "session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (mode:subagent; the epic PM's session id)",
 "premise_still_valid": true,
 "summary": "Read on objectui main 158c75d908 and objectstack main 55382dc02a (re-read at report time: objectui unchanged; objectstack moved to 8532783f65 by two commits that touch no security, spec, platform-objects or .objectui-sha path). Of the seven listed items: 1 is LANDED (the binding-editor widget: objectui#12136 as 4997995022 and objectstack#22794 as ea9fd99dd3), 1 is MOOT (F3: round 2 of objectui#12089 put the switch on the activation-ledger door, and F5's remainder landed as objectstack#22811, stage 2d), and 5 are OWED: the capability select, the approver readers (spec half landed as objectstack#22710; the objectui half is not built), the clone door (no server door, no stage, no card, no branch), resolveGrantRowId (blocked by objectstack#22863, 6b-2-pre), and F2. The census adds four rows the list did not name: the Capabilities catalog page under ?scope=environment (stage 8 must give nav_capabilities a non-row target; objectui readiness NOT MEASURED), the user-page pickers (decision objectstack-ai/objectstack#22865, open), the suggested-bindings panel (objectui#12148, accepted, in flight; names none of the four objects), and a post-stage-8 cleanup of the object-page special cases and published texts, which become dead or false at stage 8 but do not break. Three corrections to the amendment's premise, none of which voids it: (a) items 4 and 5 break at objectstack 6b-2 on a fresh database, not only at stage 8, because 6b-2 stops writing platform, package and per-organization sys_permission_set rows (6109520247, 6110720794) and both items read that row; 6b-2's landing is gated today on E2 only (6110777865). (b) Item 3 is no longer 'after their spec card': the card (objectstack-ai/objectstack#22682) is closed and its approver half is on main; what remains is how objectui consumes a spec member its installed spec 17.7.0 lacks (Q1). (c) Item 3 is already degraded on objectstack's bundled console today, read from code: that console is built with objectstack's own spec injected, where position is a registry binding, so a pending position approver renders middle-truncated and the flow designer's position cells are free text. Proposed: 5 objectui PRs before stage 8 (4 if #22865 takes B1) and 1 after, plus 2 to 3 objectstack PRs (a clone-door stage, the console pin bump, and #22865's page edit). Buildable now in parallel with 6b-2: PR-1 (capability select, Capabilities page, F2) and PR-2 (approver readers; part 3a at least). PR-3 (item 5) is buildable the moment #22863 merges and must land before 6b-2. PR-4 (clone) waits for the server door, which no stage owns (Q2).",
 "readings": [
  "Trees: objectui origin/main 158c75d908 (git ls-remote equal at start and at report time); objectstack origin/main 55382dc02a at start, 8532783f65 at report time (REST compare: 2 commits ahead, 0 behind, 22 files under cli, metadata-core, objectql plugin, service-datasource, qa/dogfood, scripts and turbo.json; none bears on this census). Both clones are shallow, so only exit-0 ancestry is claimed.",
  "Ancestry, each exit 0 (self-proving): objectstack main carries #22710 b32ee3eaf3, #22794 ea9fd99dd3, #22669 9646991283, #22736 cd3d39112c, #22751 2ff0825dab, #22811 67b669e689. objectui main carries #12136 4997995022 and #12089 0df67f237c, and 0df67f237c is an ancestor of the console pin 4997995022f8.",
  "objectstack .objectui-sha = 4997995022f8. objectui's lockfile resolves @objectstack/spec 17.7.0 (app-shell declares ^17.6.0).",
  "Capability rows: on objectstack main no source writes a sys_capability row. bootstrap-declared-capabilities.ts is absent at HEAD (git cat-file exit 128; control builtin-capabilities.ts exit 0); its deletion is 95a843573a (#22711, 6b-1c) and the curated seeder's is 7aa8d51c0f (#22709, 6b-1b). registerBuiltinCapabilities declares the 9 curated PLATFORM_CAPABILITIES as capability metadata; package-declared ones are served by the registry (GET /api/v1/meta/capability).",
  "Approver binding on objectstack main: APPROVER_VALUE_BINDINGS.position is { source: 'registry', type: 'position' }, and the approval node schema publishes it as xRef.sources. The approval service's enrichment names user-id approvers only: its comment says position and other type:value literals are already readable.",
  "6b-2-pre (objectstack-ai/objectstack#22863, open, draft, head d453ea50d7): its changeset makes sys_user_permission_set.permission_set required-by-name and permission_set_id optional, and says nothing writes the id.",
  "No server clone door for permission sets on objectstack main: git grep for clone routes finds the flow door (POST /automation/:name/clone) and the record clone (POST /data/:object/:id/clone) only. clone_permission_set is still a record action on sys_permission_set that POSTs /api/v1/data/sys_permission_set with the row's facets. No #15204 stage or comment names a clone door (all 119 comments searched); MCP search finds no card (two wordings; control: 'approver position binding by name' returns #22682); git ls-remote 'refs/heads/*clone*' returns nothing."
 ],
 "items": [
  {
   "item": "1. Capability select",
   "state": "OWED",
   "where": "CapabilityMultiSelectField (@object-ui/fields), hosted by PermissionMatrixEditor's System capabilities block (Setup's permission-set page under ?scope=environment, and Studio). It lists dataSource.find('sys_capability', { active: true }); the union with the set's selected names is all it can offer.",
   "stage_8_effect": "find on an unregistered object is refused; the widget catches it into an empty list. The picker then offers only the capabilities the set already grants, all under 'Other', and no capability can be added from Setup or Studio. This is already the state on a fresh objectstack main database since 6b-1b/6b-1c (no row writer; the window the maintainer ruled in 6104498446 and (c) keeps out of every cut). Stage 8 extends it to upgraded databases.",
   "size": "about 0.3 to 0.4k changed lines, estimated: the component is 310 lines and its tests 168 plus the spec-parity pin. The registry read is the pattern RecipientPickerField already uses in the same package (TYPE_TO_REGISTRY, MetadataCtx ensureType).",
   "depends_on": "none. The registry serves the 9 curated capabilities since objectstack#22669 plus every package-declared one.",
   "decision": "no. The card's scope says the capability matrix lists the registry. The component's props need not change; Clause-② expected no, judged at the claim."
  },
  {
   "item": "1b. Capabilities catalog page (census row, not on the list)",
   "state": "OWED or zero; NOT MEASURED",
   "where": "catalog-scope.ts: SETUP_CATALOG_TYPES is permission and position only, and its docblock says the Capabilities page and the capability picker still read sys_capability rows and that moving them is this card's follow-up. objectstack's Setup nav still has nav_capabilities as type 'object' on sys_capability.",
   "stage_8_effect": "Stage 8 retires the object page, so nav_capabilities needs a non-row target (6110720794's Setup nav row: 'objectui NOT MEASURED'). The candidate is /apps/setup/metadata/capability?scope=environment. ResourceListPage's environment scope is type-agnostic and activation is gated off for capability (hasCatalogActivation), and the capability type entry declares allowRuntimeCreate and allowOrgOverride false, so a read-only list is the expected rendering.",
   "size": "0 to 0.1k, depending on the reading.",
   "depends_on": "none. Instrument: one browser read of that URL on a fresh showcase; it rides PR-1.",
   "decision": "no"
  },
  {
   "item": "2. Binding-editor widget",
   "state": "LANDED",
   "where": "objectui#12136 as 4997995022: metadata-admin WIDGETS registers 'ref-multi:permission' (RefMultiPermissionWidget), and ResourceEditPage loads client.list('permission') only when the served form declares that widget. objectstack#22794 as ea9fd99dd3: the position form's permissionSets row is widget 'ref-multi:permission', and the console pin moved to 4997995022f8. objectstack-ai/objectstack#22682 is closed as completed.",
   "stage_8_effect": "none",
   "size": "0",
   "depends_on": "none",
   "decision": "no"
  },
  {
   "item": "3. Approver readers",
   "state": "OWED. The spec half landed (objectstack#22710 as b32ee3eaf3: position approvers and position decision outputs are registry names).",
   "where": "(3a) decisionOutputParams: OUTPUT_LOOKUP_OBJECTS maps position to 'sys_position', a hand-written table independent of the spec pin, so a position decision output in the Approve/Reject dialog (DeclaredActionsBar, the record header) is a sys_position lookup. (3b) spec-derived readers: APPROVER_DIRECTORY_BINDINGS (approverIdentity, feeding useApproverDirectory's label leg and formatIdentity's machine-name arm) and KIND_TO_RECORD_LOOKUP (FlowReferenceField; the escalation.escalateTo cell, and the approvers value cell once json-schema-to-fields' sourceOf drops the server's unknown 'registry' entry) both keep only 'data' sources. Under objectui's installed spec 17.7.0, position is data on sys_position; under objectstack main's spec it is a registry binding, so position drops out.",
   "meantime_today": "Read from code; NOT MEASURED in a browser. On objectstack's bundled console, which is built with objectstack's spec injected (OBJECTSTACK_SPEC_DIST, apps/console vite config): a pending position approver has no directory binding, so approverDisplay falls to formatIdentity and a reference longer than 14 characters is middle-truncated (the shape 77f846a8b removed), with no staffing line; the server names user-id approvers only. The designer's approver value cell and escalateTo for type position are free text. On objectui's own console (spec 17.7.0) they are a sys_position lookup, and the decision-output position picker on either console lists sys_position rows, which number 0 on a fresh main database since 6a.",
   "stage_8_effect": "The decision-output position lookup targets an unregistered object on every database, so a required position output blocks Approve. On objectui's own build the approver label leg is refused and the chip shows the prettified machine name (the staffing leg reads sys_user_position, which stays), so that part degrades gracefully. The bundled console's state does not change at stage 8: it is already degraded.",
   "size": "3a about 0.15k; 3b about 0.4 to 0.5k (approverIdentity 380 lines, useApproverDirectory 258, FlowReferenceField, flow-node-config's local RefValueSource, json-schema-to-fields' sourceOf, tests). Estimates.",
   "depends_on": "3a: none. The spec type is unchanged ('position' is in DecisionOutputDef's enum at 17.7.0) and the runtime values were already names (objectstack-ai/objectstack#22682's report). 3b: how objectui reads the 'registry' member before its spec-18 pin (Q1).",
   "decision": "3a no; 3b yes (Q1)"
  },
  {
   "item": "4. Clone door",
   "state": "OWED; the server half has no carrier",
   "where": "PermissionMatrixEditor's Clone to customize: findCloneAction resolves clone_permission_set off the sys_permission_set object definition, reads the set's row by name, and runs the action (POST /api/v1/data/sys_permission_set with the row's facets, defaultFromRow and carryOver). The refusal strings perm.clone.actionMissing and perm.clone.rowMissing (en and zh) name sys_permission_set to the admin. The seat's answer (6097763840, Q1 to A) is a server door that copies the whole definition under a new name, objectui calling it with a name and a label.",
   "stage_8_effect": "Clone on any locked set refuses: 'Clone is unavailable: the sys_permission_set object on this server publishes no clone_permission_set action.' The data-door create behind it is gone too (stage 8 unwires the write-through, E1 to A). The parity gate's 'a managed set opens read-only with a clone action' fails.",
   "earlier_break": "At 6b-2, on a fresh database: no platform, package or per-organization set row exists, so Clone refuses 'no sys_permission_set record named NAME was found' for exactly the packaged sets it exists for. An upgraded database keeps its rows until stage 8.",
   "size": "objectui about 0.5 to 0.7k (permission-set-clone-dispatch.ts 92 lines leaves; PermissionMatrixEditor.cloneToCustomize.test.tsx is 564 lines; 2 en/zh string pairs). objectstack door NOT MEASURED; the precedent is the flow clone in the runtime automation domain.",
   "depends_on": "the objectstack door (Clause-② yes, widening; a contract review). Also: ActionParamDialog's carryOver reader loses its only producer when clone_permission_set goes (the 6097735087 carrier names it as a stage-8 retirement candidate).",
   "decision": "placement, not product: Q1 to A is on record. Who builds the door, and when (Q2)."
  },
  {
   "item": "5. resolveGrantRowId off the row",
   "state": "OWED; blocked by objectstack-ai/objectstack#22863 (6b-2-pre: open, draft, Tier H)",
   "where": "AssignedUsersSection's addUsers reads the set's sys_permission_set row id, refuses with noGrantRow when there is none, and creates the grant with permission_set_id and permission_set. Its module doc records why: on main the grant door still requires the id.",
   "stage_8_effect": "The row read is refused for every set, so Add on Setup's Assigned users fails everywhere.",
   "earlier_break": "At 6b-2, on a fresh database: every platform and package set has no row, so Add shows noGrantRow for them. Also, once #22863 lands, objectui is still a writer of permission_set_id, which #22863's title says no writer fills.",
   "size": "about 0.06 to 0.1k (drop the read and the id, write by name, update the module doc and the tests).",
   "depends_on": "#22863 merged",
   "decision": "no"
  },
  {
   "item": "6. F2, the matrix editor's Custom badge",
   "state": "OWED",
   "where": "PermissionMatrixEditor's identity-row badge reads draft.managedBy (the registry serves none) or the packageId prop (unset under the environment scope), so a packaged set shows 'Custom' beside the lock. The editor already holds codeIsArtifact from the layered envelope (isArtifactBackedLayer).",
   "stage_8_effect": "none: it reads the metadata door, not the objects",
   "size": "about 0.04 to 0.06k",
   "depends_on": "none",
   "decision": "no"
  },
  {
   "item": "7. F3, the switch's label",
   "state": "MOOT",
   "where": "Round 2 of objectui#12089 (on main as 0df67f237c) put the switch on the ledger door (catalog-activation.ts: POST /security/_activation/:type/:name; the state is read from sys_metadata_activation). Seat note 6106420299: 'F3 closes for packaged items and for non-authors. Its remainder rides F5.' F5 landed as objectstack#22811 (stage 2d, 67b669e689). 'Active — click to deactivate' is now true.",
   "stage_8_effect": "none",
   "size": "0",
   "depends_on": "none",
   "decision": "no"
  },
  {
   "item": "8a. User-page pickers (E2; census row)",
   "state": "NEEDS DECISION: objectstack-ai/objectstack#22865 (open, needs-user-decision); measured by part 3 (6111055760)",
   "stage_8_effect": "per 6111055760: stage 8 retires both picker objects.",
   "size": "objectui about 0.45k under B2; 0 under B1",
   "depends_on": "the #22865 ruling",
   "decision": "yes, already filed"
  },
  {
   "item": "8b. Suggested-bindings panel (census row)",
   "state": "IN FLIGHT: objectui#12148, head 8d3b3a0eb6, draft, seat ACCEPT 6111216239",
   "stage_8_effect": "none: it names none of the four objects",
   "size": "746 changed lines (its report)",
   "depends_on": "none",
   "decision": "no"
  },
  {
   "item": "8c. Object-page special cases and published texts (census rows)",
   "state": "OWED AFTER stage 8",
   "where": "RecordDetailView's sys_permission_set slot and RecordPermissionAssignmentsRenderer; data-objectstack's applyFieldWidgetOverrides map for sys_permission_set, with PermissionFacetLink and its permission-facet-link registrations (the fields lazy map, DetailSection, InlineFieldInput, plugin-detail's index, the cli known-schema-types list); recordDelete's package-owned reset copy; ObjectView's note. Published texts naming the objects: @object-ui/types' LookupFieldMetadata idField TSDoc, plugin-detail's relationshipValueField input description (sdui manifest text), MetadataFieldsPage's TSDoc example, capabilityLint's docblock (it describes the lint branch stage 8 drops), the locale comments, ROADMAP.",
   "stage_8_effect": "none breaks: these surfaces become unreachable or false when the object pages go. Removing them before stage 8 would degrade object pages Setup nav still opens.",
   "size": "about 0.6 to 0.9k, estimated (PermissionFacetLink 162 lines, the assignments renderer 42, one whole test file of 85 lines, partial edits elsewhere)",
   "depends_on": "stage 8 landed. The v17-consumer question part 1 raised (cloud's pin hold) applies to removing them from published packages.",
   "decision": "no"
  }
 ],
 "census": {
  "instrument": "git grep -l -E 'sys_position|sys_permission_set|sys_position_permission_set|sys_capability' over objectui main 158c75d908, excluding *.test.*, __tests__, *.spec.* and Markdown below the root. 40 files and 73 lines (ROADMAP.md is root Markdown and is counted). No SystemObjectName constant and no dynamic sys_ name construction: two further greps returned 0. Tests not classified, per the dispatch: 37 test files name an object. Below-root Markdown, also not classified: packages/app-shell/README.md, docs/adr/0056, the contributor guide under .claude, and the unreleased part-1 changeset.",
  "executable_owed_before_stage_8": [
   "packages/fields/src/widgets/CapabilityMultiSelectField.tsx (7 lines; 1 executable: find sys_capability) | item 1",
   "packages/app-shell/src/utils/decisionOutputParams.ts (1: OUTPUT_LOOKUP_OBJECTS.position) | item 3a",
   "packages/app-shell/src/utils/approverIdentity.ts (4; 1 executable: DISPLAY_FIELDS_BY_OBJECT.sys_position, plus the spec-derived tables) | item 3b",
   "packages/app-shell/src/hooks/useApproverDirectory.ts (2 comments; reads through APPROVER_DIRECTORY_BINDINGS) | item 3b",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/inspectors/FlowReferenceField.tsx (1 comment; KIND_TO_RECORD_LOOKUP is spec-derived) | item 3b",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/inspectors/flow-node-config.ts (2 comments; local RefValueSource mirror) | item 3b",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/AssignedUsersSection.tsx (3; 1 executable: resolveGrantRowId) | item 5",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/permission-set-clone-dispatch.ts (3; 1 executable: PERMISSION_SET_OBJECT) | item 4",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/i18n.ts (5; 4 admin-facing clone refusal strings, en and zh) | item 4",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/PermissionMatrixEditor.tsx (5 comments: the capability adapter, the chip wall, the clone path) | items 1 and 4",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/catalog-scope.ts (1 comment that says the capability move is this card's follow-up) | item 1 rewrites it"
  ],
  "executable_dead_after_stage_8": [
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/RecordDetailView.tsx (1: the sys_permission_set slot) | 8c",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/RecordPermissionAssignmentsRenderer.tsx (2 comments; mounted only by that slot) | 8c",
   "packages/core/src/actions/recordDelete.ts (2; 1 executable: PERMISSION_SET_OBJECT reset copy) | 8c",
   "packages/data-objectstack/src/index.ts (1: applyFieldWidgetOverrides sys_permission_set map) | 8c",
   "packages/plugin-detail/src/renderers/PermissionFacetLink.tsx (1 comment; the whole renderer) | 8c",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/ObjectView.tsx (1 comment on the reset-copy row hand-off) | 8c"
  ],
  "published_text": [
   "packages/types/src/field-types.ts (1: idField TSDoc, 'an approval position approver stores sys_position.name') | 8c",
   "packages/plugin-detail/src/index.tsx (2: the relationshipValueField input description, sdui manifest text, and a comment) | 8c"
  ],
  "comments_only": [
   "packages/plugin-detail/src/InlineFieldInput.tsx (1), packages/plugin-form/src/ObjectForm.tsx (1), packages/fields/src/index.tsx (1): the permission-facet-link stamp | 8c",
   "packages/plugin-detail/src/RelatedList.tsx (2), packages/plugin-detail/src/renderers/record-related-list.tsx (1): examples of name-keyed junctions | 8c",
   "packages/plugin-designer/src/MetadataFieldsPage.tsx (1: TSDoc example) | 8c",
   "packages/app-shell/src/preview/capabilityLint.ts (1: describes the lint's sys_capability seed branch, which stage 8 drops) | 8c",
   "packages/i18n/src/locales/{ar,de,en,es,fr,ja,ko,pt,ru,zh}.ts (11 lines: 'labels come from the sys_capability registry' in all ten, and en's permission-facet note) | item 1 for the first, 8c for the second"
  ],
  "landed_history": [
   "apps/console/src/AppContent.tsx (3 comments; the routes went to SystemCatalogRedirect in part 1) | none owed",
   "packages/fields/src/widgets/RecipientPickerField.tsx (1 comment; registry since part 1) | none owed",
   "packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/catalog-activation.ts (2 comments: the row column no longer decides; true) | none owed",
   "ROADMAP.md (3 lines of history) | 8c, optional"
  ]
 },
 "order": {
  "objectui_before_stage_8": [
   "PR-1, buildable now: item 1, row 1b and F2. One PR because items 1 and F2 both edit PermissionMatrixEditor.tsx. About 0.4 to 0.5k.",
   "PR-2, buildable now: item 3. 3a needs nothing; 3b as Q1 is answered (all of it now under Q1 to B). About 0.55 to 0.65k (3a alone about 0.15k). Disjoint from PR-1's files.",
   "PR-3, buildable when #22863 merges; it lands before 6b-2: item 5. About 0.1k.",
   "PR-4, after the objectstack clone door lands, after PR-1 lands (PermissionMatrixEditor.tsx), and after #12148 lands (metadata-admin i18n.ts): item 4. About 0.5 to 0.7k.",
   "PR-5, after #22865 is ruled: B2's widget (about 0.45k), or nothing under B1."
  ],
  "objectstack": [
   "the clone-door stage (Q2), before PR-4",
   "#22865's page and field PR",
   "one .objectui-sha bump that carries PR-1 to PR-5 and #12148 before stage 8 (or the scheduled bumps, such as #22340 S2, if they come later than each PR)"
  ],
  "after_stage_8": [
   "PR-6: row 8c, about 0.6 to 0.9k; split code from test edits if it measures over the line"
  ],
  "count": "objectui: 5 PRs before stage 8 (4 under B1) and 1 after. objectstack: 2 to 3. No stacking: each branch is cut from main after its named predecessor lands.",
  "parallel_with_6b_2": "PR-1 and PR-2 now; PR-5's widget once #22865 is ruled; PR-3 from #22863's merge, which is also when 6b-2's build starts. PR-4 waits for the door.",
  "gates_this_adds": "6b-2's landing: E2 (6110777865) plus PR-3, and PR-4 or a ruled window (Q3). Stage 8's landing: PR-1 to PR-5 inside the console pin, and the clone door."
 },
 "tests": "Measure-only: nothing built, no suite run, no showcase booted (every listed item's state was read from code and records; the dispatch boots only when that fails). Instruments: (1) the census git grep above, plus a zero-hit grep for SystemObjectName and dynamic sys_ names; (2) git merge-base --is-ancestor for 8 merge commits, each exit 0 (self-proving on a shallow clone; no exit-1 claim is made); (3) git cat-file -e for the deleted capability seeder (exit 128) with a control on builtin-capabilities.ts (exit 0); (4) git ls-remote for both mains at start and at report time, for '*clone*' heads (none) and for claude/issue-7611-* heads (one: part 2); (5) REST GETs: this card and its 27 comments, objectui#12089's comments, objectstack#15204 and its 119 comments (two pages), #22682 and its comments, #22865 and its comments (none), the state of 14 cards and PRs, #22863's head and its security changeset, the compare 55382dc02a...8532783f65. NOT MEASURED, each with its instrument: the Capabilities page under ?scope=environment (a browser read on a fresh showcase); the bundled console's approver chip and designer cells (a browser read of a pending position approval on a console built with the injected spec); the objectstack clone door's size.",
 "mcp_calls": "4, all reads: mcp__github__search_issues x3 (clone door, two wordings: 0 relevant; control 'approver position binding by name' returned #22682) and mcp__github__search_pull_requests x1 (open objectstack PRs about clone: #22863 and #22850, neither a clone door). Zero MCP writes.",
 "api_writes": "1: this comment, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7611/comments through scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs (fleet relay). Every other GitHub access was a REST GET or git ls-remote. No fetch into either shared checkout; both worktrees were detached at origin/main and are removed at the end.",
 "open_questions": [
  {
   "question": "Q1 (item 3b): how does objectui consume APPROVER_VALUE_BINDINGS.position = { source: 'registry', type: 'position' } before its spec-18 pin? objectui's installed spec 17.7.0 still says data on sys_position; objectstack's bundled console and v18 servers publish the registry binding. The code must compile against both (the Spec Main Shape Gate compiles objectui against objectstack main's spec).",
   "options": [
    "A: wait for objectui's spec-18 pin. Real need: position approvers are live (the showcase approver-bindings flow), and the bundled console already truncates them and offers free text, so A leaves a measured defect in place until a v18 publish. Long term: the cleanest typing. AI error: free text stays where an author, human or AI, types an unchecked position name. Startup: no code now, but stage 8 then waits on a release act and on the (c) loop part 3 found, which is unbounded.",
    "B: read the registry member structurally ahead of the pin. objectui's local RefValueSource mirror gains { source: 'registry', type }, json-schema-to-fields' sourceOf keeps it, and the spec-derived tables read their entries through a widened structural type (an assignment, not a cast, so it compiles under 17.7.0 and under objectstack main). A registry kind lists MetadataCtx ensureType(type) and commits the name; nothing names 'position'. On objectui's own 17.7.0 build nothing changes until the pin moves. Real need: it repairs the bundled console now. Long term: the reader follows the contract its build and its server publish, generic over registry kinds, and the widened type goes when the pin moves. AI error: a registry picker in place of free text, with no ?? alias and no second spelling. Startup: no spec change, no publish, one PR. Rule: no objectui rule found that permits reading ahead of the installed spec (part 3's NOT FOUND); unlike #22865's A', B touches no authoring face, so objectui validate and the strict authoring face are unchanged.",
    "C: a hand-written position-to-registry table, ignoring the spec. Real need: the same as B. Long term: the local mirror of the binding contract that FlowReferenceField's and approverIdentity's own docblocks record as objectstack#3508's cost. AI error: a second source that drifts. Startup: smallest. It is also wrong on objectui's own console against a v17 server."
   ],
   "recommendation": "B, with 3a built now under any answer. Real need: it repairs a defect on objectstack main's console today. Long term: contract-first, removable when the pin moves. AI error: a picker beats free text, and nothing is aliased. Startup: one PR, no release dependency. Decider: the seat, as a reading of objectui AGENTS.md #0 for a reader; the maintainer if the seat reads it as a rule exception, the same family as #22865's A'."
  },
  {
   "question": "Q2 (item 4): the server clone door that the seat's Q1 answer (6097763840) placed 'as an objectstack stage before stage 8' has no stage, card or branch. Who builds it, and when?",
   "options": [
    "A: a new #15204 stage, built now in parallel with 6b-2's build and landing before 6b-2; then objectui PR-4. Real need: lock-the-base and clone-to-customize is ruled (ADR-0126 §7.1; the 2026-08-24 lock), Setup offers Clone on every packaged set today, and 6b-2 breaks it on a fresh database. Long term: one server copy rule, modelled on POST /automation/:name/clone. AI error: the server decides by declaration which keys a clone carries; no client deny-list. Startup: one door on an existing pattern; Clause-② yes (widening) and a contract review.",
    "B: build the door after 6b-2 and before stage 8, and accept a fresh-database clone window between them. It needs a maintainer ruling like 6104498446, and (c) keeps the window out of every cut. Same end state, plus a window.",
    "C: drop clone-to-customize from Setup. It contradicts the lock-and-clone ruling and the card's parity gate ('a managed set opens read-only with a clone action'), so it is the maintainer's."
   ],
   "recommendation": "A. Real need: measured break at 6b-2. Long term: no window and no transition piece. AI error: policy stays on the server. Startup: the door is the smallest step that keeps the parity gate whole; B costs a ruling for the same work later."
  },
  {
   "question": "Q3 (ordering; the seat's): items 4 and 5 break at 6b-2 on a fresh database, but 6110777865 gates 6b-2's landing on E2 alone. Does 6b-2's landing also wait for them?",
   "options": [
    "A: 6b-2 lands after PR-3 (item 5), and after the clone door and PR-4 (item 4).",
    "B: 6b-2 lands after PR-3; item 4's window follows Q2's B (the maintainer's ruling).",
    "C: E2 only; both windows accepted by a maintainer ruling and kept out of cuts by (c)."
   ],
   "recommendation": "A if Q2 is A, else B. Real need: Assigned users Add and Clone are both on the card's parity path. Long term: no window. AI error: both failures are loud refusals naming a missing row, not silent, so the cost of a window is functional rather than hidden. Startup: PR-3 is about 0.1k and is buildable the moment #22863 merges, the same moment 6b-2's build begins, so gating on it costs no calendar time."
  }
 ],
 "out_of_scope_findings": [
  "carrier: stage 8's dev (6110777865 places the unowned text rows on stage 8's branch) · noted, not filed · objectstack text that 6b-1b/6b-1c made false: SecurityPlugin's warning when registerBuiltinCapabilities returns 0 says 'Their sys_capability rows still seed', and app-showcase's capabilities.ts docblock and its coverage.ts entry say package capabilities are seeded into sys_capability. No row is seeded since 7aa8d51c0f and 95a843573a. Source reading only; no reach measured. Dedupe words: sys_capability rows still seed; seeded into sys_capability; capability seeder retired.",
  "carrier: objectui#7611 item 4 (PR-4) and objectstack's carryOver retirement · noted, not filed · ActionParamDialog's carryOver reader loses its only producer when clone_permission_set goes; 6097735087 named ActionParamSchema.carryOver a stage-8 retirement candidate, and objectui's half is that reader."
 ],
 "deviations": [
  "status 'measured' is outside os-dev's enum; the dispatch asks for it, and the template is a tool.",
  "The dispatch puts the act's clock token on the opening line, and os-dev.md says the first line is the bare marker os-dev-report. Both hold as part 3's report did it: the marker alone, then the stamped line.",
  "No showcase was booted: every listed item's state was readable from code and records. The three NOT MEASURED rows name their instruments."
 ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

Seat answer: the C9 remainder census (6111307114) is accepted · two objectui PRs dispatched now · claim amendment · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` (`marchtian`) · 2026-10-11T16:47Z

Re-read on both mains (objectui main, objectstack origin/main 8532783f65):

CapabilityMultiSelectField.tsx:179 lists dataSource.find('sys_capability', …).
decisionOutputParams.ts:73 maps position: 'sys_position'.
AssignedUsersSection.tsx:153 is resolveGrantRowId.
objectstack has no permission-set clone route; clone_permission_set is still a record action on sys_permission_set (sys-permission-set.object.ts:92).

The seat dropped one item. On 2026-10-10 the seat placed the clone door "as an objectstack stage before stage 8" (6097763840, Q1 → A). No stage was ever dispatched. That stage is opened now on objectstack-ai/objectstack#15204, by a claim amendment there.

Answers:

Q2 (clone door) → A. It is a new #15204 stage, built now in parallel and landed before 6b-2. 6097763840 already holds the ruling: a server door that copies the whole definition under a new name and drops the keys the server declares; ADR-0126 §7.1. This census only finds that it was never staged. objectui PR-4 follows it.
Q3 (ordering) → A. 6b-2's landing now waits for:
- the user-page pickers (decision [Decision] 用户页「分配岗位」「授予权限集」两个选择器改读注册表：加规范字段（A/A'）、去掉用户页入口（B1），还是给授权的名称字段配注册表选择控件（B2） objectstack#22865);
- PR-3 (item 5, the grant by name);
- the clone door and PR-4 (item 4).
Both item 4 and item 5 break at 6b-2 on a fresh database, and the seat takes no window it can close by sequencing. PR-3 is about 0.1k and is buildable the moment objectstack#22863 merges, which is also when 6b-2's build starts.
Q1 (item 3b: objectui reading the registry binding ahead of its spec-18 pin) → to the maintainer. It is the same family as #22865's A': objectui acting on a spec member its installed spec lacks. The seat adds it to #22865 as a sub-question, recommending the census's B (a structural reader, no authoring face). Item 3a needs no answer and is dispatched now.

Dispatched now (claim amendment; each developer is a subagent of this seat, mode:subagent; one draft PR each, Part of #7611, no stacking):

PR-1: item 1, census row 1b and F2. The capability select lists the registry; the Capabilities catalog page has a registry target for Setup nav (measured in a browser first); the matrix editor's identity badge reads the layered envelope. Branch claude/issue-7611-capability-registry.
PR-2a: item 3a. The approval dialog's position decision output lists the position registry and commits the name. Branch claude/issue-7611-decision-output-position. 3b waits on #22865.

Sequenced:

PR-3 (item 5) when #22863 merges.
PR-4 (item 4) after the clone door, PR-1 and objectui#12148 land.
PR-5 per the #22865 ruling.
PR-6 (row 8c) after stage 8.

objectstack takes the panel and the PRs at a .objectui-sha bump before stage 8.

Carried:

The census's out-of-scope finding on objectstack text that 6b-1b/6b-1c made false goes to stage 8's developer, with the unowned text rows of 6110777865. It covers SecurityPlugin's "Their sys_capability rows still seed" warning and app-showcase's capabilities.ts docblock and coverage.ts entry.
ActionParamDialog's carryOver reader goes with PR-4 and the objectstack carryOver retirement.

Generated by Claude Code

Landed (C9, the suggested-bindings panel): objectui#12148 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T17:04Z

Merge: the queue merged it at 2026-10-11T17:03Z as f962cdc0930c, which is objectui main at this record.
- ACCEPT: 6111216239.
- Contract PASS: 6111199978, on 8d3b3a0eb6.
On main: all 18 files the PR changed are byte-identical to the PR head 8d3b3a0eb6 (blob compare against the merge commit).
What objectui main now does: the panel on the marketplace package page and in the Studio Access pillar lists every suggestion of the package, in the state the server records:
- pending;
- pending on guest, with no Accept and the reason shown;
- accepted, with Revoke;
- accepted but not yet in force, after bindingCreated: false;
- dismissed or revoked.
A 403 or 409 shows the server's own message. A caller without manage_metadata still sees nothing.
Not yet in objectstack's bundled console: objectstack's .objectui-sha is 4997995022f8. The next bump before stage 8 carries this panel and the remainder PRs (6111342697).
Reported to the maintainer, not decided here: a revoke cannot be re-accepted through these routes (the PR's open question 2).
This card stays open:
- the pickers ([Decision] 用户页「分配岗位」「授予权限集」两个选择器改读注册表：加规范字段（A/A'）、去掉用户页入口（B1），还是给授权的名称字段配注册表选择控件（B2） objectstack#22865);
- PR-1 and PR-2a (in flight);
- PR-3, PR-4 and PR-6 (sequenced).

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report
{
"issue": 7611,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-7611-decision-output-position",
"pr": "#12152",
"head": "6eb495c67d25b26732ac83dc9955322fe5660a6c",
"session": "session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR — subagent of the epic PM, so the parent session id",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "PR-2a, item 3a. The Approve/Reject dialog renders a position decision output as a select over the position registry and commits the position names. decisionOutputParams rewrites the typed table entry: position leaves OUTPUT_LOOKUP_OBJECTS and becomes the one entry of OUTPUT_REGISTRY_TYPES, a catalog kind. The options are read through the console metadata store, ensureType(position), which is the reader RecipientPickerField lists the same registry through. Value is the machine name, label is the label, else the name; the list is sorted by name and nameless items are dropped. DeclaredActionsBar is the one decision surface (the Approval Center and the record page). Only a decision with a catalog output awaits the read; every other decision still dispatches in the click tick. With no metadata store, the output degrades to free text, as the recipient picker does. An empty registry still renders the select. No new param key, no new widget, nothing else names position. The apps/console approvalsApi docblock that said position values are record ids is corrected. Premise held, measured: on a fresh showcase database sys_position has 0 rows and the base console lists nothing. One correction to the dispatch wording: the ENGINE always read names (expandPositionUsers), but the old dialog committed sys_position row ids, LookupField default id field. That is read from code, as the #22682 ACCEPT records. On the wire after this change the decide body carries names, and the engine routed the next step by them. One self-inflicted regression was found and fixed before the report. 87aa908 awaited the read on every decision, which broke DeclaredActionsBar.overrideAffordance (3 red). 6eb495c restores the synchronous dispatch and pins it. Process notes: (1) The assignee was written with label-write --assign, as the dispatch says. The os-dev.md on objectstack main now spells PR assignment as pr_create with assignees, so I followed the dispatch and flag the drift. (2) The harness asked for a model-identifying Co-Authored-By trailer. The commits carry the model-free pair that AGENTS.md and the dispatch require. (3) Labels: zero written. The dispatch named none, and objectui labeler.yml set apps, tests and package: app-shell.",
"tests": "Head 6eb495c, from git rev-parse at the runs; all heavy runs went through os-verify-lock with slot 7611-pr2a, and each result is its VERDICT line. (1) Related suites: vitest run --maxWorkers=2 over the 29 app-shell and apps/console test files that name DeclaredActionsBar, decision outputs or ApprovalDecisionPanel (git grep -l). Result: Test Files 29 passed (29), Tests 308 passed (308), VERDICT command-exit 0. (2) pnpm --filter @object-ui/app-shell type-check (tsc --noEmit plus tsc -p tsconfig.test.json): exit 0. --listFilesOnly shows both edited test files in the test program. The app-shell dependency closure was built first, 28/28 tasks. (3) objectui gates, derived by hand from package.json, all exit 0: check-changeset-presence (5 source files, 2 released packages, 1 changeset), check-changeset-no-major, check:changeset-claims, check:pending-changeset-literals, check:new-line-citations (0 new), check:control-bytes, check:vi-mock-specifiers, check:vi-mock-inherit, check:vi-mock-override-shape, check:test-path-roots, check:i18n-keys, check:shell-escape-residue, check:spec-symbols. (4) eslint narrowed to the 5 changed source files: 0 errors. Against the base, the only new warnings are 2 no-explicit-any from as-any action fixtures. The narrowing is proven three ways: the population is the 5 files eslint returned results for, none of them ignored; the count of 5 comes from --format json; and eslint.config.js enables no type-aware linting (no parserOptions.project or projectService), so untouched files cannot change verdict. (5) Browser measurement. The showcase booted from objectstack origin/main 8532783f65 (detached worktree, closure 60/60 cached) with objectstack dev --seed-admin --fresh. Consoles ran from the branch and from the base a7d4920 via vite with DEV_PROXY_TARGET. On the fresh database, GET data/sys_position returned records [] with total 0, and GET meta/position served 16 positions. A runtime flow was saved by PUT meta/flow/pr2a_position_output: lead_review declares the position output (multiple, required) and co_sign has the approver expression vars.lead_review.parallel_positions with resolveAs position. Before, on the Approval Center and the record page: the lookup sends GET data/sys_position?top=50 and shows No options found. After: the dialog sends GET meta/position, offers 16 positions, and refuses a blank Confirm with Parallel Positions is required. Picking Auditor and Project Manager posts {"outputs":{"parallel_positions":["auditor","manager"]}}. The request then stores __decisionOutputs with the same names, and co_sign opened with pending_approvers set to the holders of auditor and manager in sys_user_position. The after leg ran at 87aa908 and again at 4223b14 on a second fresh database, with identical results. (6) Ablations via objectstack scripts/ablation-replace.mjs in wrap mode. Each leg checked that the anchor went x1 to x0, that the blob changed, and that the restore was proven (blob == HEAD, empty git diff HEAD). There was no dist leg, because vitest aliases @object-ui/* to src. Every new pin went red under at least one mutation. Table entry dropped: 9 red at 87aa908 and 10 red at 6eb495c. Bar passes no registry: 1 red at both shas. Failed read left absent, no sort, label equals name, absent registry read as [], second read per type, read every typed output, fold joins arrays: each red as listed in the PR body. Two legs did not measure first time. The empty-name leg stayed GREEN because the fixture had no empty-string name; 4686fb7 adds one, and the rerun was 2 red. The await-guard leg was REFUSED by the tool before any test ran, because its replacement was a prefix of the anchor; the rerun used a distinct replacement and was 1 red. Final restore: both blobs equal HEAD (217b7f8a5fe1, be58bb51f9a3), git status empty. NOT MEASURED, declared for CI: the full app-shell package suite (stopped after about 11 min holding the shared lock with another agent queued; it had reported only the overrideAffordance file red, fixed in 6eb495c and green in the 29-file run), full pnpm test, pnpm lint, and the console type-check (the console change is a comment). CI at report time on 6eb495c: 42 check runs, 21 success, 3 skipped, 18 in_progress, 0 failure. Cleanup: all three servers were stopped by recorded PID tree, and ports 4317, 5317 and 5318 answer nothing. Both objectui worktrees (the branch and the base control) are removed. The objectstack worktree is removed right after this comment posts, since it hosts the write tools.",
"mcp_calls": "0",
"api_writes": "3 — relay strokes, each POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches: (1) pr_create on objectstack-ai/objectui, giving PR #12152 draft, body read back byte-identical; (2) assign marchtian on #12152 through label-write, read back matching; (3) this os-dev-report comment on objectui#7611 through post-stamped. Not REST writes: git push of 4 commits to the branch. The metadata PUT and the data PATCH and POST calls went to the local showcase only.",
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: none · noted, not filed · The position registry the decision output (and the sharing-rule recipient picker) lists includes the built-in audience positions everyone and guest. The engine expandPositionUsers reads sys_user_position rows plus the membership tier, so a position held only implicitly probably resolves to nobody, and a run that picked it would route into onEmptyApprovers. Read from code; no reach measured. Dedupe words: audience position picker; everyone position decision output; implicit position approver.",
"carrier: none · noted, not filed · The options are sorted by machine name (mirroring RecipientPickerField), so the labels read out of alphabetical order, and a multiple output renders as a chip group (16 chips on the showcase). Polish only."
]
}

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report
Posted 2026-10-11T18:20Z · objectui#7611 PR-1 of the remainder (item 1, row 1b, F2) · developer: a subagent of the epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR, under claim amendment 6111342697 · PR #12153 at 0070a807e.

{
 "issue": 7611,
 "part": "PR-1 of the remainder: census item 1 (the capability select), census row 1b (the Capabilities catalog page) and F2 (the matrix editor’s \"Custom\" badge), per claim amendment 6111342697",
 "status": "done",
 "branch": "claude/issue-7611-capability-registry",
 "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/12153",
 "head": "0070a807eda5ab7fd7a90c38b1e9bffc8c6c642c",
 "session": "session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (mode:subagent; the epic PM’s session id)",
 "premise_still_valid": true,
 "summary": "Item 1: CapabilityMultiSelectField lists the console metadata store’s capability items (MetadataCtx ensureType, i.e. GET /api/v1/meta/capability), the registry pattern RecipientPickerField ships. It never calls dataSource.find on sys_capability, merges no second list, and keeps its props and its grouping. The host no longer passes the adapter. On a fresh showcase it went from 1 chip (the set’s own grant, under Other) to 11 (the 9 curated plus showcase.export_data and showcase.restricted_ops). Row 1b: measured in a browser, /apps/setup/metadata/capability?scope=environment already renders the registry read-only (11 items, no New, no switch, no status filter, no sys_capability read; an item opens locked with no Save), so no code change was needed. SETUP_CATALOG_TYPES keeps capability out on purpose, because it names the activation-switch types and the door refuses a capability (ablation A3 shows the switch appearing). Its docblock and the app-shell README were rewritten. F2: the identity badge also reads codeIsArtifact, so showcase_ops and admin_full_access read Package beside the lock (they read Custom before). Premise held: at base the picker read sys_capability (0 rows on a fresh database, against 11 registry items).",
 "stage_8_url": "nav_capabilities should target /apps/setup/metadata/capability?scope=environment, the scope-carrying form SystemCatalogRedirect uses for positions and permission sets. objectstack is not changed here.",
 "cloud": "Measured on cloud’s framework 56bf27affb (worktree at that commit, fresh showcase): GET /api/v1/meta/capability serves 2 items (showcase.export_data, showcase.restricted_ops), while GET /api/v1/data/sys_capability holds 12 rows (17.7’s 10 curated plus those 2). builtin-capabilities.ts is absent there (contents API 404; control security-plugin.ts 200), and 56bf27affb is 308 commits behind objectstack#22669 (REST compare: behind 308, ahead 0). So on cloud this picker would offer 2 capabilities plus a set’s own grants, against 12 today: a regression. The existing hold covers it: cloud’s .objectui-sha must not pass 0df67f237c5a until cloud is on v18 (6106811169), and 0df67f237c5a is an ancestor of this PR’s base a7d492011 (merge-base --is-ancestor exit 0, which proves itself on a shallow clone). The PR body states the v17 effect under Acceptance notes but does not name the hold. Suggested line for the seat to add: \"Cloud: covered by the existing hold. cloud’s .objectui-sha stays before 0df67f237c5a until cloud is on v18. On cloud’s framework 56bf27affb the capability registry serves 2 items against 12 sys_capability rows, so this picker would show cloud’s organizations fewer capabilities than today.\"",
 "tests": "All local runs on HEAD 0070a807e, through the shared lock. vitest packages/fields/: 244 files passed and 1 skipped; 3979 tests passed and 7 skipped. vitest packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/ plus the 16 test files elsewhere that name a touched module (git grep): 488 files passed; 5512 tests passed and 1 skipped. vitest packages/i18n/: 82 files passed; 1316 tests passed and 13 skipped. turbo build of @object-ui/app-shell^... (28/28), then type-check for fields, i18n and app-shell, each exit 0; tsconfig.test.json --listFilesOnly includes the new and changed tests. eslint (root config, --no-inline-config) on the 17 changed TS files: 0 errors, and no type-aware linting is configured. Gates, each exit 0: changeset presence and no-major, check:new-line-citations (0 new), control-bytes, i18n-keys, i18n-drift, vi-mock-specifiers, vi-mock-inherit, vi-mock-override-shape, test-path-roots, changeset-claims, pending-changeset-literals, unused-deps, phantom-deps; check-governed-queue-guard --test: NOT GOVERNED. NOT MEASURED: check:readme-exports, prerequisite not met (it needs every package dist; it refused with the population COLLAPSED, 36 of 40 unbuilt); the README edit is prose only. Ablations, each from a committed state with the restore proven (blob equal to HEAD, git diff HEAD empty). A1: CapabilityMultiSelectField.tsx set to its base blob (on disk: registry read 0, row read 1, blob equal to base) gave 9 failed and 11 passed, including all 3 new registry cases. A2: ablation-replace --delete of the badge’s codeIsArtifact term (anchor 1 to 0) gave 1 failed (Expected Package, Received Custom) with the 3 controls green. A3: ablation-replace adding capability to SETUP_CATALOG_TYPES gave the 1b pin failed (the status filter rendered) and 11 others green. Browser before and after, on objectstack 8532783f65 with this branch’s console (before = both changed source files at base, during A1): picker 1 chip to 11, request GET /api/v1/data/sys_capability to GET /api/v1/meta/capability; badge Custom to Package on two packaged sets, and the environment-authored set Custom in both.",
 "mcp_calls": "0",
 "api_writes": "3 REST writes, each through the fleet relay as objectstack-fleet[bot], and each one repository_dispatch POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (HTTP 204). (1) pr_create, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls: #12153, draft, body read back identical (9566 bytes). (2) label-write --assign marchtian, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/12153/assignees: read back matching, labels untouched (the labeler’s five). (3) This comment, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7611/comments, via post-stamped.mjs. Also 2 git pushes of the branch. Every other access was a REST GET or git ls-remote/fetch into a named ref of this session’s own worktree.",
 "open_questions": [],
 "out_of_scope_findings": [
  "carrier: objectui#7611 PR-4 (it edits PermissionMatrixEditor.tsx) · noted, not filed; a reading, no reach measured, and not in the PR’s Acceptance notes · the badge’s managedBy platform arm renders Platform (zh 平台内置, built in), while the spec’s PermissionSetSchema TSDoc says managedBy platform/user are environment config, live-edited, and permission.form.ts offers platform to authors · dedupe words: managedBy platform badge; perm.badge.platform; provenance tri-state."
 ],
 "deviations": [
  "A1 mutated by checking out the base blob of the whole file (git checkout a7d492011, then unstaged), not through scripts/ablation-replace.mjs. The pin covers the whole read path, and the base blob is exactly the pre-fix state. Landing was proven on disk (anchor counts, and the blob equal to the base blob); the restore ran under an EXIT/INT/TERM trap on absolute paths and was proven by the blob equal to HEAD and an empty git diff HEAD.",
  "A2’s first attempt was a no-op: ablation-replace refused it before running anything, because the replacement was a substring of the anchor. The second attempt used --delete.",
  "The first whole-fields run returned exit 99: the lock budget ran out behind another seat’s whole app-shell suite. It was re-run green and is not counted as a measurement.",
  "Local scope narrowed: app-shell’s whole suite (1272 files) was not run. The metadata-admin directory (488 files) and the 16 consumers outside it were. CI runs the rest.",
  "The ten i18n locale comments were edited (the census row puts them under item 1). @object-ui/i18n is not in the changeset frontmatter, because only comments moved; the presence gate passes.",
  "The PR declares no for Clause-②. The claim carried no such line, and the dispatch asked for one derived from what moves. No export or exported type changes; CapabilityMultiSelectField keeps its props type and no longer reads the dataSource prop. The behaviour change is stated in the changeset.",
  "Commit trailers use AGENTS.md’s model-free pair, not the harness’s model-named Co-Authored-By line, per the dispatch: no model identifiers.",
  "The PR body does not name the cloud hold (see cloud). Per the dispatch the body is written once, so the line is handed to the seat."
 ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12152 (item 3a) at `6eb495c67d` and PR #12153 (PR-1: item 1, row 1b, F2) at `0070a807ed`; both queued on green

Epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (marchtian), seat epic:#15194, 2026-10-11T19:21Z. Both developers were subagents of this seat (mode:subagent), under answer-and-amendment 6111342697. Reports: 6112022388 (#12152) and 6112186742 (#12153).

Checklist, read on GitHub, not from the reports:

PR form, both PRs:
- base main, draft;
- line 1 is Part of #7611, line 2 is Clause-②: no;
- the whole body is scanned: no closing keyword next to a card number;
- the assignee is marchtian.
Scope:
- fix(app-shell): a position decision output lists the position registry and commits position names (objectui#7611) #12152: 6 files, +387 / −17.
- feat(fields,app-shell): the capability select lists the capability registry; the matrix badge reads the layered envelope (part of objectui#7611) #12153: 19 files, +417 / −104.
- check-governed-merges --pr reads NOT governed for both, so both take an ordinary queue landing. No CHANGELOG.md. The files are disjoint from each other and from PR-3 (in flight).
Changesets, each sentence read against the diff:
- fix(app-shell): a position decision output lists the position registry and commits position names (objectui#7611) #12152 7611-decision-output-position-registry.md, app-shell and console minor:
  - the position output lists the registry through ensureType('position') and commits names (objectstack#22710's contract, which the engine's resolveAs: 'position' matches); the lookup committed sys_position row ids;
  - outside a MetadataProvider the output is free text, and an empty registry renders an empty select;
  - department and team are unchanged.
- feat(fields,app-shell): the capability select lists the capability registry; the matrix badge reads the layered envelope (part of objectui#7611) #12153 7611-capability-registry.md, fields and app-shell minor:
  - the capability select lists GET /api/v1/meta/capability through ensureType, with no second list, and an unknown granted name stays under "Other";
  - the props are unchanged, and the dataSource prop is no longer read;
  - the badge reads the layered envelope, so a package-shipped set reads "Package";
  - the Capabilities page already renders the registry read-only (measured), so no code change was needed.
Clause-②: no holds for both. No export, exported type or accept set moves. fix(app-shell): a position decision output lists the position registry and commits position names (objectui#7611) #12152 changes what the client sends (names, where it sent ids), and that is what the server's published contract already asks for.
Evidence:
- fix(app-shell): a position decision output lists the position registry and commits position names (objectui#7611) #12152: 29 related files, 308 tests green; the premise measured (0 sys_position rows on a fresh database); one self-inflicted regression found and fixed before the report, with the synchronous dispatch pinned.
- feat(fields,app-shell): the capability select lists the capability registry; the matrix badge reads the layered envelope (part of objectui#7611) #12153: fields 244 files, metadata-admin plus consumers 488 files, i18n 82 files, all green; three ablations, each with its restore proven; a browser measurement that the picker went from 1 chip to 11 on a fresh showcase, and that the Capabilities page renders read-only.
- Declared narrowing on both: app-shell's whole suite was not run locally; CI's shards own it. feat(fields,app-shell): the capability select lists the capability registry; the matrix badge reads the layered envelope (part of objectui#7611) #12153's check:readme-exports is NOT MEASURED, because a prerequisite was refused; the README edit is prose only.
CI on both heads at this read: 40 success, 3 skipped, 0 red; mergeable_state is clean.
Contract review: not owed, since Clause-②: no on both, confirmed above.

Carried:

feat(fields,app-shell): the capability select lists the capability registry; the matrix badge reads the layered envelope (part of objectui#7611) #12153's out-of-scope note (the managedBy: platform badge text against the spec's TSDoc) goes to PR-4, which edits the same editor.
fix(app-shell): a position decision output lists the position registry and commits position names (objectui#7611) #12152's process note (os-dev.md on objectstack main now spells PR assignment inside pr_create; this dispatch said label-write) goes to the skills lane as a dispatch-template drift. Not filed.

Then: pr_ready + automerge_enable on both, now. On MERGED, one Landed record here. objectstack picks both up at its .objectui-sha bump before stage 8.

Generated by Claude Code

Landed (C9 remainder, PR-1 and item 3a): objectui#12153 and #12152 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T19:42Z

objectui#12153 (PR-1: item 1, row 1b, F2):
- The queue merged it at 2026-10-11T19:41Z as 53ee2f8542. ACCEPT: 6112768716.
- On main: 9 of its 19 files are byte-identical to the PR head 0070a807ed. The other 10 are the locale packs. main changed them meanwhile (e723f58ee, objectui#12149's aria-label translations), and the PR's one added line in each is present in the merged file.
- What main now does: the capability select lists the capability registry (GET /api/v1/meta/capability) and reads no sys_capability row. A package-shipped permission set reads "Package" beside its lock. The Capabilities page renders the registry read-only (measured; no change needed).
objectui#12152 (item 3a):
- The queue merged it at 2026-10-11T19:41Z as 8cc7158b4e, which is objectui main at this record. ACCEPT: 6112768716.
- On main: all 6 changed files are byte-identical to the PR head 6eb495c67d.
- What main now does: a position decision output in the Approve and Reject dialogs is a select over the position registry, and it commits position names.
The remainder now:
- In flight: PR-3 (the grant by name).
- Waiting:
  - PR-4 (the clone client) waits for stage CD (objectstack#22881, in a patch round);
  - PR-5 waits for decision [Decision] 用户页「分配岗位」「授予权限集」两个选择器改读注册表：加规范字段（A/A'）、去掉用户页入口（B1），还是给授权的名称字段配注册表选择控件（B2） objectstack#22865;
  - 3b waits for #22865's Q3b.
- After stage 8: PR-6.
objectstack's .objectui-sha is still 4997995022f8. The bump before stage 8 carries feat(app-shell): the suggested-bindings panel shows each suggestion's state and revokes an acceptance (part of objectui#7611) #12148, fix(app-shell): a position decision output lists the position registry and commits position names (objectui#7611) #12152, feat(fields,app-shell): the capability select lists the capability registry; the matrix badge reads the layered envelope (part of objectui#7611) #12153 and the rest.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report
Posted 2026-10-11T20:15Z · objectui#7611 PR-3 of the remainder (item 5, a grant by name) · developer: a subagent of the epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR, under claim amendment 6111342697 · PR #12159 at 45e2c0c4d.

{
 "issue": 7611,
 "part": "PR-3 of the remainder: census item 5, resolveGrantRowId off the row (claim amendment 6111342697)",
 "status": "done",
 "branch": "claude/issue-7611-grant-by-name",
 "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/12159",
 "head": "45e2c0c4daf87c1e74c8df753ace47323cc24e0c",
 "session": "session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (mode:subagent; the epic PM's session id)",
 "premise_still_valid": true,
 "summary": "Setup's Assigned users (AssignedUsersSection) now writes a grant by name alone: addUsers creates sys_user_permission_set with { user_id, permission_set }, reads no sys_permission_set row and writes no permission_set_id. resolveGrantRowId, the noGrantRow refusal and its en/zh strings are removed (nothing else used them), and the module doc says what the section reads and writes. Revoke is unchanged (delete by the grant's row id). The section writes no organization_id, as before; measured: the server stamps the caller's organization. Premise verified on objectstack origin/main 72b26ed4f5, which contains 0253192f76 (#22863; merge-base --is-ancestor exit 0). Measured on a fresh showcase with the platform set viewer_readonly's sys_permission_set row deleted: the base code refuses with noGrantRow and sends no POST (control leg); this branch answers POST 201 with { user_id, permission_set }, and the holder's /auth/me/permissions gains viewer_readonly; a name the catalog lacks answers 400 VALIDATION_FAILED reference_not_found, shown verbatim in the section's alert; revoke answers DELETE 200 and the holder loses the set. A changeset (app-shell minor) states the change and the server floor; the unreleased part-1 changeset loses the one sentence this makes false (a bounded in-place edit, conditions in the PR). Draft PR #12159 (Part of #7611, Clause-②: no), assigned marchtian.",
 "tests": [
  "Head 45e2c0c4d. Whole package: pnpm exec vitest run packages/app-shell/ --maxWorkers=2 under os-verify-lock (VERDICT command-exit 0): Test Files 1271 passed | 1 skipped (1272); Tests 12325 passed | 9 skipped (12334).",
  "pnpm --filter @object-ui/app-shell type-check (tsc --noEmit && tsc -p tsconfig.test.json; script name echoed): VERDICT command-exit 0, after building the app-shell^... closure (turbo, 28 tasks successful). tsc -p tsconfig.test.json --listFilesOnly lists all three touched files.",
  "New pins (AssignedUsersSection.test.tsx, fixture with no sys_permission_set row): ADD writes exactly { user_id, permission_set } and reads no catalog row; a 400 reference_not_found built as @objectstack/client builds it and passed through the adapter's own normaliseClientError is shown in the server's words; REMOVE deletes the direct grant by its row id. Targeted run: 2 files, 12 tests passed.",
  "Ablations, one-time, via objectstack scripts/ablation-replace.mjs (anchor hit x1, blob changed, restore proven by empty git diff HEAD and blob == HEAD 00f7e7c921e2) plus a shell trap restore; each run: exactly the targeted pin red, 7 others green. A1 plant permission_set_id in the create body: pin 1 red at toHaveBeenCalledWith. A2 plant a sys_permission_set find: pin 1 red at not.toContain. B setError(c.addFailed): pin 2 red (received 'Failed to assign. Please try again.'). C removeUser(r.userId): pin 3 red at toHaveBeenCalledWith. The subject is imported by relative path, so no dist is involved.",
  "Browser measurement (Chromium /opt/pw-browsers/chromium via Playwright): backend objectstack 72b26ed4f5 built with OS_SKIP_DTS=1 (turbo, 60 tasks) and booted with objectstack dev --seed-admin --fresh on its own port; console = this branch's apps/console under Vite proxied to it. The row was deleted in the fresh SQLite file (the data door's DELETE answered 200 success:false and kept it) at the moment of each click, count read back 0 at the click and 0 after the add. Control leg with the base file swapped in and restored (diff empty, blob == HEAD). Results as in the summary; screenshots kept outside the repo and removed with the scratch directory.",
  "Lint, narrowed and proven: eslint --no-inline-config --format json on the 3 touched files: 3 files, 0 errors (warnings pre-existing in kind). Population from the config: --print-config answers 118 rules, parserOptions.project null and projectService null (type-aware linting off), and no eslint-rules/ rule reads the filesystem, so the diff cannot move a verdict on an untouched file. pnpm lint is CI's.",
  "Gates on 45e2c0c4d, each exit 0: check-changeset-presence.mjs, check-changeset-no-major.mjs, check:new-line-citations (0 new), check:control-bytes, check:vi-mock-inherit, check:vi-mock-specifiers, check:vi-mock-override-shape, check:test-path-roots, check:changeset-claims, check:pending-changeset-literals. objectui has no dispatch-gates.mjs; this list was derived by hand from package.json check scripts against the diff (tests with vi.mock, changesets, source).",
  "CI at report time: 42 check runs, 21 success, 3 skipped, 18 in_progress. Not waited on."
 ],
 "cleanup": "Both servers (backend and console) were stopped by PID before this post, and the --fresh directory went with them. Both worktrees and their node_modules are removed right after this post; the hand-back confirms it.",
 "mcp_calls": "0",
 "api_writes": "3 relay strokes plus 1 git push: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, relayed as pr_create POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls (draft, #12159; read back 9178 bytes identical); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, relayed as POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/12159/assignees (marchtian; read back matches); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7611/comments (this report, via post-stamped). Other GitHub access was REST GETs and git ls-remote. Measurement-local writes on my own fresh server only: one admin create-user, grants added and revoked, rows deleted in its temporary database.",
 "open_questions": [
  {
   "question": "Server floor and release order: the console from this branch adds a grant that only an objectstack server carrying #22863 accepts. objectstack 17.7.0 (published) still requires permission_set_id, and #22863 rides objectstack's next release. A deployment pairing a published @object-ui/app-shell that contains this PR with an older objectstack server gets a 400 on Add (shown in the section). Does the seat order anything beyond the changeset's statement?",
   "options": [
    "A: nothing beyond the changeset's server-floor sentence. Real need: objectstack's bundled console moves only with a .objectui-sha bump, which already comes after #22863 on objectstack main, and the seat's plan lands PR-3 before 6b-2. Long term: one grant dialect, by name, with no client fallback. AI error: none added. Startup: zero work.",
    "B: hold objectui's next release, or this PR's landing, until objectstack publishes #22863. Real need: protects an npm pairing of new app-shell with an old server, if such a deployment exists; none is named. Long term: neutral. AI error: neutral. Startup: costs sequencing on a release act, and 6b-2 already waits on PR-3.",
    "C: keep writing permission_set_id when a row exists (a compatibility fallback). Real need: same as B. Long term: a second dialect, the tolerant fallback AGENTS.md #0.1 forbids, and #22863 says no writer fills the id. AI error: fosters the shape #22863 retired. Startup: more code. Not recommended."
   ],
   "recommendation": "A. The ordering between tasks is the seat's call, not a maintainer question. Real need: the only named consumer (the bundled console) is already ordered after #22863. Long term: contract-first. AI error: no fallback. Startup: no extra work. If the seat knows of a deployment that pairs published app-shell with a pre-#22863 server (the cloud pin hold), B for that release."
  }
 ],
 "out_of_scope_findings": [
  "class: a · reach: public door, measured on this run: Setup /apps/setup/metadata/permission/no_such_set_7611?scope=environment opens the permission-set editor create-only and still renders Assigned users with Add user; Add can only answer 400 VALIDATION_FAILED reference_not_found ('... or declare the set first'), so the affordance on an unsaved set always fails. Predates this PR (the base refused with the noGrantRow text). Landing point: PermissionMatrixEditor's showAssignments gate, outside this PR. Dedupe words: 'Assigned users unsaved permission set', 'showAssignments create-only', 'Add user before save'",
  "carrier: PR-4 (census item 4, the clone door) · PermissionMatrixEditor.tsx cloneToCustomize's comment says AssignedUsersSection resolves the same set's record the same way; after this PR it does not. The file was out of bounds for this PR. Noted, not filed.",
  "carrier: none (承接者:无) · the data door's DELETE on a platform sys_permission_set row answered 200 with success:false and kept the row. DeleteDataResponseSchema declares success as a boolean, so this is no contract breach; recorded in the PR's measurement section only."
 ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12159 (PR-3, item 5: Assigned users grants by name) at `45e2c0c4da`; queued on green

Epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (marchtian), seat epic:#15194, 2026-10-11T20:17Z. The developer was a subagent of this seat (mode:subagent) under answer-and-amendment 6111342697. Report: 6113279608.

Checklist, read on GitHub, not from the report:

PR form:
- base main, draft;
- line 1 is Part of #7611, line 2 is Clause-②: no;
- the whole body is scanned: no closing keyword next to a card number;
- the assignee is marchtian.
Scope: 5 files, +103 / −43. check-governed-merges --pr reads NOT governed, so this is an ordinary queue landing. No CHANGELOG.md.
Changesets, each sentence read against the diff:
- the new 7611-grant-by-name.md (app-shell minor) covers the add by name, with no row read and no permission_set_id; the server's 400 shown; remove unchanged; the server floor; Clause-②: no;
- the edit to the unreleased part-1 changeset 7611-setup-catalog-registry.md removes exactly one sentence ("A new grant still carries permission_set_id …") that this PR makes false. Fixing in the round what the round makes false is required, so the in-place edit is right.
Clause-②: no holds. No export, prop or locale key moves. The two removed strings were the section's own.
Evidence:
- app-shell's whole suite: 1,271 files and 12,325 tests passed;
- type-check;
- three new pins on a fixture with no catalog row, and four ablations, each turning exactly its own pin red, with the restore proven;
- in the browser against objectstack 72b26ed4f5 (which contains #22863), after deleting viewer_readonly's row: the base refuses with noGrantRow and sends nothing; this branch answers 201, and the holder gains the set; an unknown name answers 400 with reference_not_found, shown word for word; revoke answers 200.
CI at this read: 25 success, 3 skipped, 14 in progress. mergeable_state is behind (fix(app-shell): a position decision output lists the position registry and commits position names (objectui#7611) #12152 and feat(fields,app-shell): the capability select lists the capability registry; the matrix badge reads the layered envelope (part of objectui#7611) #12153 merged meanwhile); the queue rebuilds on main.

The developer's open question (the server floor) → A, no ordering beyond the changeset's sentence:

The bundled console moves only with objectstack's .objectui-sha bump, which already comes after #22863.
The one named pairing of new objectui with an older server is cloud, whose .objectui-sha hold (not past 0df67f23 until cloud is on v18) is already with the maintainer.
A fallback that still writes permission_set_id would be the second dialect #22863 retired.

Carried to PR-4, which edits PermissionMatrixEditor.tsx:

(a) The developer's class-a finding: an unsaved permission set (…/metadata/permission/new_name?scope=environment) still renders Assigned users with Add, and Add can only answer 400. The landing point is the showAssignments gate.
(b) The cloneToCustomize comment that says Assigned users "resolves the same set's record the same way" is false after this PR.

Then: on all-green, pr_ready + automerge_enable. On MERGED, a Landed record here. 6b-2's landing no longer waits on this item once it merges.

Generated by Claude Code

Landed (C9 remainder, PR-3: grant by name): objectui#12159 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T20:54Z

Merge: the queue merged it at 2026-10-11T20:54Z as faf4ce9523, which is objectui main at this record. ACCEPT: 6113300670.
On main: all 5 changed files are byte-identical to the PR head 45e2c0c4da.
What main now does: Setup's Assigned users on a permission set grants by name, with { user_id, permission_set }. It reads no sys_permission_set row and writes no permission_set_id, so a set with no catalog row can be granted. A name the catalog lacks gets the server's 400, shown as is. Revoke is unchanged.
For objectstack:
- Item 5 is done. 6b-2's landing (objectstack#15204 6111348289) now waits only for PR-4 (the clone client, dispatched) and the pickers (decision [Decision] 用户页「分配岗位」「授予权限集」两个选择器改读注册表：加规范字段（A/A'）、去掉用户页入口（B1），还是给授权的名称字段配注册表选择控件（B2） objectstack#22865).
- The .objectui-sha bump before stage 8 carries feat(app-shell): the suggested-bindings panel shows each suggestion's state and revokes an acceptance (part of objectui#7611) #12148, fix(app-shell): a position decision output lists the position registry and commits position names (objectui#7611) #12152, feat(fields,app-shell): the capability select lists the capability registry; the matrix badge reads the layered envelope (part of objectui#7611) #12153 and this PR.
Open on this card: PR-4 (in flight), PR-5 and 3b (#22865), PR-6 (after stage 8).

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report
Posted 2026-10-11T22:15Z · objectui#7611 PR-4 (item 4, the clone client) · developer: a subagent of the epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR, mode:subagent, under answer-and-amendment 6111342697. PR: #12164 (draft), head 5523d86e5.

{
 "issue": 7611,
 "part": "PR-4 of the remainder: census item 4 (the clone client), plus the ACCEPT 6113300670 'Carried to PR-4' items (a) and (b) and #12153's managedBy badge note, under answer-and-amendment 6111342697",
 "status": "done",
 "branch": "claude/issue-7611-clone-door-client",
 "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/12164",
 "head": "5523d86e5ce5b7f96ec8c31d7d374ea65b9d9f0f",
 "session": "session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (mode:subagent; the epic PM's session id)",
 "premise_still_valid": true,
 "summary": "Clone to customize on a packaged permission set now opens a dialog (PermissionSetCloneDialog.tsx, the packaged-flow clone dialog's shape) asking for a new machine name and label, and POSTs exactly { name, label } to /api/v1/security/permission-sets/:name/clone through permission-set-clone.ts (fetch against apiBase, ADR-0112 envelope via actionErrorDetail, the catalog-activation.ts pattern for a server-only door). On success the routed editor opens the copy in place keeping the query string (a Setup copy opens in Setup) and shows the server's notice verbatim; an embedded host announces it by name with the notice; refusals show the server's message in the dialog. permission-set-clone-dispatch.ts, the sys_permission_set row read, the clone_permission_set dispatch, the editor's four @object-ui/react hooks that served only it, and perm.clone.actionMissing / perm.clone.rowMissing (no other reader) are removed. Carried (a): Assigned users is not rendered when the layered read answers the not-found shape (every layer null); a rejected read decides nothing; the first env-door Save under the page's name brings it back. Carried (b): the false comment went with the function; the caller-gate comment now names the clone door's metaWriteCapabilityVerdict. Texts my change made false (copy 'owned by your organization'; hint naming clone_permission_set) now say 'authored in this environment', en and zh. carryOver: left in place by measurement (see tests). managedBy badge: not a mechanical text fix, so unchanged and put in open_questions. Premise verified on base c0c2f792b against the same server state: Clone refused 'no sys_permission_set record named showcase_field_ops_delegate was found' after the row was deleted, and an unsaved set showed Assigned users with Add. One dispatch assumption did not hold: the door answers 200, not 201, for a created copy (the dispatcher's success helper); the client accepts any non-refused 2xx.",
 "tests": "Browser, objectstack 45e206e498 (contains #22881 and #22863) app-showcase --fresh on a private port, this branch's console via Vite. Rows of showcase_field_ops_delegate (has adminScope) and showcase_member_default (isDefault true) deleted in the database (the data door refuses the delete with success:false); registry still served both. At 154949786: Clone sent one request, POST /api/v1/security/permission-sets/showcase_field_ops_delegate/clone {name:field_ops_delegate_copy,label:'Field Ops Delegate (copy)'} answered 200; page moved to /apps/setup/metadata/permission/field_ops_delegate_copy?scope=environment with Save enabled, no Clone, notice verbatim, Assigned users rendered, badge Custom; no sys_permission_set request. Read back via /meta/permission: copies carry no adminScope and no isDefault (sources: adminScope present, isDefault true), no _packageId/_provenance. Taken name: 409 RESOURCE_CONFLICT, dialog open with the server message word for word, page stayed on the source. 'Bad Name': 400 VALIDATION_FAILED, name-rule sentence shown. Non-holder (auditor persona granted organization_admin: manage_org_users, setup.access, setup.write, no manage_metadata): no Clone, the manage_metadata reason shown; the door called as that user answers 403 PERMISSION_DENIED 'Saving a metadata item requires the `manage_metadata` capability.'; unauthenticated 401. Unsaved set never_saved_branch: no Assigned users and no Add; after first Save the section renders. Base run (two source files set to c0c2f792b, restored, blob equal to HEAD, git diff HEAD empty): refused rowMissing after GET /data/sys_permission_set returned 0 records; unsaved set showed Assigned users with Add. Re-measured at 5523d86e5 on a restarted console (the first Vite server kept a stale transform of i18n.ts after the base restore and rendered raw perm.clone.* keys; a fresh server served HEAD): 200, 409, 400 and the hop with copies *_copy2, same answers, copies again without adminScope/isDefault. carryOver: GET /api/v1/meta/object serves exactly 5 carryOver params across 108 objects, all on sys_permission_set's clone_permission_set (list_item, record_header), so ActionParamDialog's reader keeps its only producer on the object page after this PR; it implements the spec's ActionParamSchema.carryOver, which the spec's action form still offers, so it is not objectui-local dead code; left for stage 8's retirement. Unit: PermissionMatrixEditor.cloneToCustomize.test.tsx rewritten (fetch stubbed with the measured answers) and setupCatalog-7611 extended, 28 passed at both commits. app-shell whole suite at 154949786 through the lock: 1272 files passed and 1 skipped, 12344 tests passed and 9 skipped (held the lock 2638s on a shared box). At 5523d86e5: all PermissionMatrixEditor* suites, permission-slice*, and packages/i18n's three readers of this i18n table: 26 files, 193 tests passed; check-i18n-call-site-keys.test.ts passed at the first commit. turbo build @object-ui/app-shell^... (28/28) then app-shell type-check (tsc --noEmit and tsconfig.test.json) exit 0 at both commits; --listFilesOnly lists both changed suites and both new modules. Gates exit 0 at 5523d86e5: changeset presence/no-major/fixed/overwrite/claims, pending-changeset-literals, new-line-citations (0 new), control-bytes, i18n-keys, i18n-drift, i18n-designer-parity, vi-mock-specifiers/inherit/override-shape, test-path-roots, unreferenced-sources, metadata-write-doors, handler-key-reads, check-type-check-coverage; check:eager-closure exit 0 after a local console vite build at 5523d86e5; i18n-dead-keys report names none of this PR's keys. ESLint root config --no-inline-config on the six changed TS files: 0 errors, no rule more frequent than at base per file (no type-aware linting configured). Ablations, 12 legs via ablation-replace (anchor hit once, blob changed; restore proven blob == HEAD and git diff HEAD empty), each turning exactly its named pin red: A1 extra body key, A2 hop drops query, A3 notice removed (2 pins), A4 embedded line removed, A5 Cancel submits, A6 no-name guard off, A7 fallback replaces server message (409 and 403 pins), A8 fallback replaced, A9 canAuthor dropped from clone gate, A10 existence term dropped, A11 post-save existence write removed, A12 failed read counted as not found. A10's first attempt was refused by the tool before any run (replacement ';' already in the file); re-run with a distinct anchor. A1, A5, A7, A8 re-run at 5523d86e5 against the moved code, same red; final tree git diff HEAD empty.",
 "mcp_calls": "0",
 "api_writes": "3 REST writes, each through the fleet relay (one repository_dispatch to objectstack-ai/objectstack per stroke, executed as objectstack-fleet[bot]): pr_create = POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls (draft, read back 11228 bytes identical); label-write --assign marchtian = POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/12164/assignees (read back: assignees marchtian, labels unchanged tests and package: app-shell, set by labeler); post-stamped = POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7611/comments (this report). Plus git push of the branch (3 pushes, not REST). Every other GitHub access was a GET.",
 "ci": "in_progress at report time: 21 success, 3 skipped, 18 in progress of 42 check runs on 5523d86e5 (one read, no waiting)",
 "open_questions": [
  {
   "question": "The permission-set editor's provenance badge renders managedBy 'platform' as 'Platform' (zh '平台内置', 'built into the platform'), while the spec's PermissionSetSchema.managedBy TSDoc says 'platform/user = environment config, live-edited and never touched by package seeding' and permission.form.ts offers 'Platform (environment config)'. The runtime's row vocabulary is the other reading: the seeder stamps sys_permission_set.managed_by 'platform' on admin_full_access. Not a mechanical text correction: which vocabulary the badge follows is a contract reading. Measured reach: the registry serves no managedBy on any of the showcase's permission sets (0 of 22 after the clones), no permission-set definition on objectstack main declares one, the clone door drops it, and the matrix editor has no managedBy field, so the 'platform' arm renders only for a definition an author or package declares with it; none exists in-tree.",
   "options": [
    "A: no change here; carry the split to the spec seat as an ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove reading of PermissionSetSchema.managedBy (declared, offered in the form, served by nobody) and let the badge follow whatever survives, with stage 8's row retirement. Real need: zero producers measured, so nothing users see changes. Long term: the vocabulary is decided once, in the spec. AI error: an AI author can still declare managedBy platform and read 'built in' in zh until then, a dormant mislabel. Startup: zero work now.",
    "B: zh-only text fix '平台内置' to '平台', matching en 'Platform' and the spec form's option head. Real need: none measured. Long term: keeps a three-state badge whose 'Platform' state the spec calls environment config, so it pins a reading of a split contract. AI error: removes the 'built in' claim in one locale only. Startup: one line.",
    "C: render 'platform' as the environment-config family ('Custom'), following the TSDoc, and drop perm.badge.platform. Real need: none measured. Long term: badge matches the spec as written, but decides the contract reading in the renderer. AI error: an author-set platform no longer reads as built in. Startup: small, plus a test.",
    "D: change the spec instead (if a definition's 'platform' is meant to mean platform-shipped, as the row seeder uses it), objectstack spec seat. Real need: none measured. Long term: one vocabulary across row and definition. AI error: contract says what the runtime means. Startup: a spec card and a publish."
   ],
   "recommendation": "A. Real need: the arm has no producer (measured), so B or C would spend a change on a state nobody can reach. Long term: the inconsistency is between the spec's TSDoc and the runtime's row vocabulary, so the fix belongs where the key is declared, not in a renderer; a declared-but-unserved definition key is an enforce-or-remove candidate. AI error: dormant only while no producer exists. Startup: zero work; decider is the spec seat, as a note with stage 8's managedBy/row retirement."
  }
 ],
 "out_of_scope_findings": [
  "carrier: none (noted, not filed; in the PR's Acceptance notes) · the clone door answers 200 for a created copy; the dispatch expected 201. No contract I found declares 201 for this door (its changeset names no status), so it is an observation, not class b. Dedupe words: permission-set clone door 200 201; security permission-sets clone status.",
  "carrier: none (noted, not filed) · environment, not product: after a path-scoped 'git checkout HEAD -- path' restore, the running Vite dev server kept serving the pre-restore transform of i18n.ts (raw perm.clone.* keys rendered); a restarted server served HEAD. Only a measurement hazard for base/branch browser comparisons."
 ],
 "deviations": [
  "The door answered 200 where the dispatch said 'On 201'; the client treats any non-refused 2xx as success, and the PR says so.",
  "status 'done' with CI in_progress, per os-dev: the report is due at the end of local verification; CI convergence is the PM's.",
  "The whole app-shell suite ran at the first commit only; the second commit moved one function unchanged and edited two comments, and its narrowing (editor suites, permission-slice, the i18n readers, all gates, eager closure, type-check, re-run dialog ablations) is declared here and in the PR body.",
  "No labels written beyond the assignee: objectui's path labels come from labeler.yml and the dispatch named none."
 ],
 "cleanup": "Both servers stopped by recorded PID (the --fresh database removed itself); the objectui worktree and its node_modules removed (clean, head equal to the remote branch). The objectstack worktree is removed right after this comment is posted, since the relay tools run from it."
}

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

feat: Setup catalog pages read the registry (editable under `single`, read-only under a wall); assignment pages stay data pages; pickers list the registry (objectstack ADR-0131 D3/D7) #7611

v18 pre-opening re-verification (C9): HOLDS. Nothing is implemented, and the blocker lines are incomplete

The ruling

State

Triage: executing ruling `6094171670` (batch #310 item 1). `pm:blocked` → `pm:queue`, routed to the objectui `domain:ui` lane

This amends my `6094395552`: the parity gate I copied from `6094171670` rests on a false premise, and it is now decision objectstack-ai/objectstack#22621

22 remaining items

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12148 (C9, the suggested-bindings panel) at `8d3b3a0eb`; queued on green

Seat answer: the C9 remainder census (6111307114) is accepted · two objectui PRs dispatched now · claim amendment · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` (`marchtian`) · 2026-10-11T16:47Z

Landed (C9, the suggested-bindings panel): objectui#12148 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T17:04Z

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12152 (item 3a) at `6eb495c67d` and PR #12153 (PR-1: item 1, row 1b, F2) at `0070a807ed`; both queued on green

Landed (C9 remainder, PR-1 and item 3a): objectui#12153 and #12152 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T19:42Z

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12159 (PR-3, item 5: Assigned users grants by name) at `45e2c0c4da`; queued on green

Landed (C9 remainder, PR-3: grant by name): objectui#12159 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T20:54Z

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

feat: Setup catalog pages read the registry (editable under single, read-only under a wall); assignment pages stay data pages; pickers list the registry (objectstack ADR-0131 D3/D7) #7611

Description

Activity

claude commented on Sep 4, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 6, 2026

v18 pre-opening re-verification (C9): HOLDS. Nothing is implemented, and the blocker lines are incomplete

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 6, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

The ruling

State

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

Triage: executing ruling 6094171670 (batch #310 item 1). pm:blocked → pm:queue, routed to the objectui domain:ui lane

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

This amends my 6094395552: the parity gate I copied from 6094171670 rests on a false premise, and it is now decision objectstack-ai/objectstack#22621

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

22 remaining items

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12148 (C9, the suggested-bindings panel) at 8d3b3a0eb; queued on green

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

Seat answer: the C9 remainder census (6111307114) is accepted · two objectui PRs dispatched now · claim amendment · epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR (marchtian) · 2026-10-11T16:47Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

Landed (C9, the suggested-bindings panel): objectui#12148 · epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR · 2026-10-11T17:04Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12152 (item 3a) at 6eb495c67d and PR #12153 (PR-1: item 1, row 1b, F2) at 0070a807ed; both queued on green

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

Landed (C9 remainder, PR-1 and item 3a): objectui#12153 and #12152 · epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR · 2026-10-11T19:42Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12159 (PR-3, item 5: Assigned users grants by name) at 45e2c0c4da; queued on green

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

Landed (C9 remainder, PR-3: grant by name): objectui#12159 · epic PM session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR · 2026-10-11T20:54Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 11, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

feat: Setup catalog pages read the registry (editable under `single`, read-only under a wall); assignment pages stay data pages; pickers list the registry (objectstack ADR-0131 D3/D7) #7611

Triage: executing ruling `6094171670` (batch #310 item 1). `pm:blocked` → `pm:queue`, routed to the objectui `domain:ui` lane

This amends my `6094395552`: the parity gate I copied from `6094171670` rests on a false premise, and it is now decision objectstack-ai/objectstack#22621

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12148 (C9, the suggested-bindings panel) at `8d3b3a0eb`; queued on green

Seat answer: the C9 remainder census (6111307114) is accepted · two objectui PRs dispatched now · claim amendment · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` (`marchtian`) · 2026-10-11T16:47Z

Landed (C9, the suggested-bindings panel): objectui#12148 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T17:04Z

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12152 (item 3a) at `6eb495c67d` and PR #12153 (PR-1: item 1, row 1b, F2) at `0070a807ed`; both queued on green

Landed (C9 remainder, PR-1 and item 3a): objectui#12153 and #12152 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T19:42Z

Seat ACCEPT: objectui PR #12159 (PR-3, item 5: Assigned users grants by name) at `45e2c0c4da`; queued on green

Landed (C9 remainder, PR-3: grant by name): objectui#12159 · epic PM `session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR` · 2026-10-11T20:54Z