Conversation
Specify the concrete record graph, exact target selection, mixed acquisition, identity, validation, and security model for portable Java and Playwright definitions. Align the repository and blueprint environment contracts with versioned tool requirements, selected-closure identity, and migration from the interim flat embedded catalog.
Allow exact relative subtree exclusions to be applied before local-source observation and bind them into source identity. Accept valid single-root Python sdists without explicit directory headers while preserving archive safety checks. Fixes #80
42c95ea to
351e00d
Compare
8811f06 to
0253192
Compare
|
PR-cycle state — maintained automatically. Do not edit. {
"approval": {
"approved_revision_fingerprint": "sha256:d70f047489815969fe679642916cd56c3451f91df535481de7fa8dd009adea36",
"evidence_fingerprint": "sha256:f54ef0da5d20ccac5c502c5f3ffafe090b03f6aed58ec226cc0a978ab30a6527",
"rounds": 9
},
"delivery_deferrals": [],
"findings_summary": {
"applied": 16,
"non_actionable": 2,
"note": "the changelog-fragment finding recurred in all nine rounds and is non-actionable: the fragment is present in every reviewed head since e473525e4668",
"total": 18
},
"pull_request": {
"base": {
"ref": "pr82",
"sha": "17c7dbbbd2a99e583ada4512bff709ac6f661198"
},
"head": {
"ref": "pr86",
"sha": "0eb14331b9fa58b7e4c62d3e46ef942ebaac470d"
},
"number": 86,
"repository": "github.com/omry/reploy"
},
"required_checks": {
"conclusion": "success",
"count": 7
},
"revision_fingerprint": "sha256:d70f047489815969fe679642916cd56c3451f91df535481de7fa8dd009adea36",
"scope_authority": {
"docs/PORTABLE_TOOL_DEFINITION_DESIGN.md": "sha256:a7acc70b0b1e390cd4d7d0e60b0f30e6a17500f6a12828195d4b5e8d083ff536",
"docs/PORTABLE_TOOL_DEFINITION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md": "sha256:900a01621dacdffd2f391a366a1542bc9f054528bb2175cd6683e5ec839b401a"
},
"threads": {
"open": 0,
"total": 19
},
"version": 5
} |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later. |
|
Review request declined by the connector: "You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews." No attributable current-head review result exists, so this PR returns to draft and its PR-cycle run is paused, resumable at head |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 02531926e4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex, regular review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 02531926e4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e473525e46
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 742ba53c3e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex, regular review 3f5af63 Note on the repeated changelog finding: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3f5af633c1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7084147ce4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 676083026a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0c34f07644
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cf6832d936
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Add a dependency-ordered delivery plan for completing the accepted portable tool definition design through reviewable Java and Playwright slices. Define the preparation gates that retire the oversized PR 83 and PR 85 work into parked extraction sources, and link the plan from the normative design without changing its decisions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0eb14331b9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0eb14331b9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Closing as superseded during the bottom-up stack rebuild. This PR’s implementation-plan and design-link responsibility was folded into rebuilt PR #81 at head 5ab6005, where it was materially updated and reviewed as the PTD-01 through PTD-28 authority. Reapplying this PR’s older PTD-01 through PTD-24 diff would regress that authority. The rebuilt stack therefore skips #86; #88 will be rebuilt directly onto #82. |
1 participant
Add a dependency-ordered delivery plan for completing the accepted portable tool definition design through reviewable Java and Playwright slices.
Define the preparation gates that retire the oversized PR 83 and PR 85 work into parked extraction sources, and link the plan from the normative design without changing its decisions.
Scope authority
Intent: establish
docs/PORTABLE_TOOL_DEFINITION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.mdas the delivery authority for tasks PTD-01 through PTD-24 under the normative Portable Tool Definition Design.Acceptance criteria:
nox -s docs-buildpasses.Exclusions: no implementation code, no record schemas, no catalog behavior, and no change to the accepted design's decisions. Superseded PRs #83 and #85 are closed; their content is parked locally and delivered later as PTD-01 through PTD-11.