fix(quay-docs):Remove commented-out 3.0-master downstream section from README.adoc - #1783
Merged
stevsmit merged 1 commit intoAug 31, 2026
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Surge Preview Deployment✅ Preview deployed successfully! 🔗 Preview URL: https://quay-docs-pr-1783.surge.sh Built from commit 15c55fa This preview will be updated on every push to this PR. |
sarfarazgit
commented
Aug 31, 2026
sarfarazgit
left a comment
sarfarazgit
left a comment
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As suggested, I deleted line 166 to 208. kindly review it.
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue: cleaning up the commented-out 3.0-master section in quay-docs/README.adoc
It would be a good cleanup to remove the commented-out 3.0-master section entirely (lines 168–207), since it describes a deprecated workflow and could cause confusion for anyone reading the raw source file (as it did here). A small PR to strip that dead block would keep things tidy.
I have removed the commented out section since it describes a deprecated workflow and could cause confusion for anyone.
Reported Issue: #812
Opened: PROJQUAY-12816