Welcome to the public repository for benchmarking Recallr AI against other memory providers (Supermemory, Mem0) on the LongMemEval (Oracle) benchmark.
| Provider | Strategy | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| Recallr AI | Auto Recall | 488/500 (97.5%) |
| Recallr AI | Agentic | 466/500 (93.2%) |
| Recallr AI | Low Latency | 439/500 (87.8%) |
| Recallr AI | Balanced | 428/500 (85.6%) |
| Mem0 | Non Graph | 313/500 (62.6%) |
| Mem0 | Graph | 311/500 (62.2%) |
| Supermemory | Default | 159/500 (31.8%) |
Note: The Recallr AI website reports an overall accuracy of 97.5%, measured using Auto Recall, a routing layer added after these per-strategy benchmarks were run. Auto Recall automatically selects the best strategy (Agentic, Balanced, or Low Latency) for each input query, combining the strengths of all three.
| Provider | Strategy | Min | P25 | Median | P95 | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recallr AI | Low Latency | 0.234 | 0.265 | 0.299 | 0.408 | 0.750 |
| Recallr AI | Balanced | 1.032 | 1.132 | 1.198 | 1.575 | 3.548 |
| Recallr AI | Agentic | 5.125 | 6.194 | 6.997 | 8.619 | 20.095 |
| Mem0 | Non Graph | 0.489 | 0.504 | 0.786 | 1.787 | 6.171 |
| Mem0 | Graph | 0.697 | 0.746 | 0.961 | 2.692 | 10.458 |
| Supermemory | Default | 0.392 | 0.851 | 1.301 | 3.293 | 4.242 |
| Question Type | Agentic | Balanced | Low Latency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Update | 92.3% | 94.9% | 97.4% |
| Multi-session | 89.5% | 91.0% | 91.0% |
| Single-session Assistant | 100.0% | 26.8% | 26.8% |
| Single-session Preference | 100.0% | 93.3% | 96.7% |
| Single-session User | 100.0% | 95.7% | 98.6% |
| Temporal Reasoning | 89.5% | 92.5% | 97.0% |
| Question Type | Non Graph | Graph |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Update | 76.9% | 75.6% |
| Multi-session | 65.4% | 63.2% |
| Single-session Assistant | 19.6% | 19.6% |
| Single-session Preference | 90.0% | 90.0% |
| Single-session User | 90.0% | 90.0% |
| Temporal Reasoning | 48.9% | 50.4% |
| Question Type | Default |
|---|---|
| Knowledge Update | 60.3% |
| Multi-session | 35.3% |
| Single-session Assistant | 3.6% |
| Single-session Preference | 20.0% |
| Single-session User | 30.0% |
| Temporal Reasoning | 27.1% |
Below are the commands used to run and evaluate each of the benchmark scripts on 500 records from longmemeval_oracle.json.
Run the benchmark:
uv run python3 run_recallr_longmemeval.py \
--data-path data/longmemeval/longmemeval_oracle.json \
--start-index 0 --end-index 499 \
--parallelism 20 --output-dir runsEvaluate the results:
uv run python3 evaluate_runs.py \
--provider recallr \
--benchmark-version oracle \
--requests-per-minute 200Run the benchmark:
uv run python3 run_mem0_longmemeval.py \
--data-path data/longmemeval/longmemeval_oracle.json \
--start-index 0 --end-index 499 \
--parallelism 20 --output-dir runsEvaluate the results:
uv run python3 evaluate_runs.py \
--provider mem0 \
--benchmark-version oracle \
--requests-per-minute 200Run the benchmark:
uv run python3 run_supermemory_longmemeval.py \
--data-path data/longmemeval/longmemeval_oracle.json \
--start-index 0 --end-index 499 \
--parallelism 20 --output-dir runsEvaluate the results:
uv run python3 evaluate_runs.py \
--provider supermemory \
--benchmark-version oracle \
--requests-per-minute 200- These results use the LongMemEval Oracle dataset.
- The evaluation is produced and published by Recallr AI, not by an independent third party.
- Cloud provider behaviour may change after the recorded benchmark date.
- LLM-based evaluation can exhibit model-dependent judgment variance.
We welcome independent reproduction, corrections, new provider integrations, and methodology improvements.
Contributions are welcome! If you want to add new memory providers, datasets, or optimize existing strategies, feel free to open a pull request or submit an issue.