Skip to content

docs(blog): add T8, T9, and T10 network upgrade posts - #885

Draft
decofe wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
centaur/add-t8-t9-t10-blog-posts-1789661867
Draft

decofe wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
centaur/add-t8-t9-t10-blog-posts-1789661867

Conversation

@decofe

@decofe decofe commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The developer blog stops at T7 even though the protocol docs cover T8, T9, and T10. Add one network-upgrade post for each release, with integration guidance and links to the existing upgrade references and specifications.

  • T8: current committee reads, FeeAMM policies, compact DEX order storage, and the final rewards shutdown.
  • T9: TIP-403 token policy bindings and targeted migration for zone/provable contract flows.
  • T10: native ZoneFactory, deterministic portals, shared runtimes, and the permissioned rollout.

The posts follow the existing blog format and Tempo writing guidelines. Dates match the documented mainnet activations (July 30, August 6, and August 21, 2026), following the T7 post's convention. These are retrospective posts; node guidance links to the current release table instead of recommending an obsolete binary.

Validation: Type checking passed. All three posts pass the existing blog renderer with valid metadata and internal page/anchor links. The repository internal-anchor check also passed.

Full build and browser page validation remain blocked: Vocs cannot fetch https://api.tempo.xyz/openapi.json from this sandbox (connection timeout). The same dependency blocks the dev server. No site configuration was changed to bypass it. This PR is a draft pending review and full preview validation; nothing has been published.

Prompted by: @snario

Co-authored-by: Derek Cofausper <256792747+decofe@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
tempo-docs Ready Ready Preview Sep 17, 2026 4:23pm UTC

Request Review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants