Skip to content

fix(verify): correct doc drift in TR-08 verification skill - #71

Draft
mite404 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/verify-skill-doc-drift-8a19
Draft

fix(verify): correct doc drift in TR-08 verification skill#71
mite404 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/verify-skill-doc-drift-8a19

Conversation

@mite404

@mite404 mite404 commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Changes

This PR fixes documentation drift found during the scheduled maintenance pass for .agents/skills/verify-tr-08/.

Drift Corrections

  1. Track volume range (track-controls.md)

    • Was: -60 to +6 dB (66 dB range)
    • Now: -45 to +5 dB (50 dB range)
    • Source: src/components/TrackControls.tsx lines 79-81
  2. BPM bounds enforcement (playback-controls.md)

    • Was: "The UI clamps BPM between 40 and 300. Clicking bpm-up at 300 or bpm-down at 40 does nothing."
    • Now: Clarified that bounds are enforced at data layer (Zod schema) but UI handlers don't clamp
    • Source: src/App.tsx handleIncrementBpm/handleDecrementBpm (lines 601-617)

Verification Method

Source-code review of:

  • src/components/TrackControls.tsx (volume knob min/max)
  • src/App.tsx (BPM increment/decrement handlers)
  • src/types/beat.ts (Zod schema validation)

Live Testing

Live testing was blocked by network connectivity issues in the Cloud Agent VM (npm/curl SSL failures preventing dependency installation). The doc corrections are proven from source code and safe to merge.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

- Fix track volume range: -45 to +5 dB (not -60 to +6)
- Clarify BPM bounds: data layer enforces 40-300, UI doesn't clamp
- Source: TrackControls.tsx lines 79-81, App.tsx handleIncrementBpm/handleDecrementBpm

Co-authored-by: Ethan Anderson <mite404@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
tr-08 Ready Ready Preview Sep 7, 2026 2:00pm UTC

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants